Cited by 321Algal biology and biofuel productionWastewater Treatment and ReuseAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The Use of Microalgae for Coupling Wastewater Treatment with CO2 biofixation

Open access
Molazadeh, Marziyeh, Ahmadzadeh, Hossein, Pourianfar, Hamid R., Lyon, Stephen, Rampelotto, Pabulo Henrique·2019·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract

Production and emission of CO2 from different sources have caused significant changes in the climate, which is the major concern related to global warming. Among other CO2 removal approaches, microalgae can efficiently remove CO2 through the rapid production of algal biomass. In addition, microalgae have the potential to be used in wastewater treatment. Although, wastewater treatment and CO2 removal by microalgae have been studied separately for a long time, there is no detailed information available on combining both processes. In this chapter, microalgae-based CO2 biofixation, various microalgae cultivation systems, and microalgae-derived wastewater treatment are separately discussed, followed by the concept of integration of CO2 biofixation process and wastewater treatment. In each section, details of energy efficiency and differences across microalgae species are also given.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00042

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 321

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Larsson M. Lindblom J. (2011). Algal Flue Gas Sequestration and Wastewater Treatment: An Industrial Experiment. Master's Thesis, KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Machine Design.
  2. Wood S. Cowie A. (2004). A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertiliser production, in IEA Bioenergy Task (Harvard), 1– 20.

Authors
Molazadeh, M., Ahmadzadeh, H., Pourianfar, H. R., Lyon, S., & Rampelotto, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
  • Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (IR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Ahmadzadeh, Hossein
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2019-03-19
Volume
7
Pages
42-42
ISSN
2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2923577318
Cited by
321
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae, CO2 biofixation, wastewater treatment, algal biomass production, energy efficiency, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review