The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioactive Cellulose Nanocrystal-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
Open accessAbstract
3D-printed bone scaffolds hold great promise for the individualized treatment of critical-size bone defects. Among the resorbable polymers available for use as 3D-printable scaffold materials, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) has many benefits. However, its relatively low stiffness and lack of bioactivity limit its use in load-bearing bone scaffolds. This study tests the hypothesis that surface-oxidized cellulose nanocrystals (SO-CNCs), decorated with carboxyl groups, can act as multi-functional scaffold additives that (1) improve the mechanical properties of PCL and (2) induce biomineral formation upon PCL resorption. To this end, an in vitro biomineralization study was performed to assess the ability of SO-CNCs to induce the formation of calcium phosphate minerals. In addition, PCL nanocomposites containing different amounts of SO-CNCs (1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 wt%) were prepared using melt compounding extrusion and characterized in terms of Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength, crystallinity, thermal transitions, and water contact angle. Neither sulfuric acid-hydrolyzed CNCs (SH-CNCs) nor SO-CNCs were toxic to MC3T3 preosteoblasts during a 24 h exposure at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 3.0 mg/mL. SO-CNCs were more effective at inducing mineral formation than SH-CNCs in simulated body fluid (1x). An SO-CNC content of 10 wt% in the PCL matrix caused a more than 2-fold increase in Young's modulus (stiffness) and a more than 60% increase in ultimate tensile strength. The matrix glass transition and melting temperatures were not affected by the SO-CNCs but the crystallization temperature increased by about 5.5°C upon addition of 10 wt% SO-CNCs, the matrix crystallinity decreased from about 43 to about 40%, and the water contact angle decreased from 87 to 82.6°. The abilities of SO-CNCs to induce calcium phosphate mineral formation and increase the Young's modulus of PCL render them attractive for applications as multi-functional nanoscale additives in PCL-based bone scaffolds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures







Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“If the addition of NC significantly increases the crystallinity of the composite, the biodegradation rate decreases since the crystalline domains are less accessible to microbes and water compared to amorphous regions [74,75]”
From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?
Kokubo, T., & Takadama, H. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 · Cited by 9,578
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review
Wilson, C. J., Clegg, R. E., Leavesley, D. I., & Pearcy, M. J. (2005) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 · Cited by 1,696
Lin, N., Huang, J. T., & Dufresne, A. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr30260h · Cited by 904
Energy dissipation in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy
Cleveland, J. P., Anczykowski, B., Schmid, A. E., & Elings, V. B. (1998) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.121434 · Cited by 881
The role of prenucleation clusters in surface-induced calcium phosphate crystallization
Dey, A., Bomans, P. H. H., Müller, F. A., Will, J., Frederik, P. M., de With, G., & Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. (2010) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2900 · Cited by 786
Aliphatic polyesters. I. The degradation of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) in vivo
Pitt, C. G., Chasalow, F. I., Hibionada, Y. M., Klimas, D. M., & Schindler, A. (1981) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.1981.070261124 · Cited by 729
Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting
Araki, J., Wada, M., & Kuga, S. (2001) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la001070m · Cited by 720
Habibi, Y., Goffin, A.-L., Schiltz, N., Duquesne, E., Dubois, P., & Dufresne, A. (2008) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b809212e · Cited by 672
TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers
Habibi, Y., Chanzy, H., & Vignon, M. R. (2006) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-006-9075-y · Cited by 666
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery
Janmohammadi, M., Nazemi, Z., Salehi, A. O. M., Seyfoori, A., John, J. V., Nourbakhsh, M. S., & Akbari, M. (2023) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.018 · Cited by 323
Ngwenya, M., Gumede, T. P., Pérez Camargo, R. A., & Motloung, B. (2025) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma18225172 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J. K., Cooke, S. L., Whittington, A. R., & Roman, M.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roman, Maren
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-02-25
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 605924-605924
- ISSN
- 2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7947866
- OpenAlex
- W3133428517
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Keywords
- cellulose nanocrystals, polycaprolactone, bone tissue engineering, 3D-printed bone scaffolds, biomineralization, mechanical properties, Young's modulus, tensile strength, crystallinity, water contact angle, biocompatibility, critical-size bone defect, resorbable polymers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review