Cited by 68Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Developmental Epigenetics: Phenotype and the Flexible Epigenome

Open access
John, Rosalind M., Rougeulle, Claire·2018·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

The term "epigenetics" has been widely used and abused (Greally, 2018) but the most compelling definition of epigenetics is the study of changes in gene function that are heritable through cell division, yet reversible, and that do not involve changes in DNA sequence -with heritability and reversibility being the key factors.Epigenetic information persists after the original inductive process that drove the modification has ceased, providing a cellular memory of the process or exposure in subsequent generations.Epigenetic marks allow the cell to remember what kind of cell it is irrespective of positional information and other extracellular information.Parent cells use epigenetic marks to "tell" their daughter cells what type of cell they will become, a message that may persist through thousands of cell divisions for the lifetime of the organism, unless they are actively erased or lost through epimutation.Epigenetic processes are fundamentally important for cell identity, lineage determination, regeneration and re-establishing of the next generation.They explain how an identical set of genomic instructions can generate all the required cell types for the organism without the need, in most cases, to alter gene sequence.The heritability through mitosis of the epigenetic information is relatively well characterized and acknowledged by the scientific community.Studies in various organisms, including plants and nematodes, have also revealed that epigenetic traits can be propagated through meiosis i.e., from one generation to the next.There is, however, much debate as to whether this holds true in mammals.The reason behind this questioning is the extensive epigenetic reprogramming that occurs twice in mammalian life, namely during the formation of the gametes and, after their fusion, in the embryo to be implanted.These events lead to an a priori complete (and this is where part of the debate stands) erasure of the epigenetic information that has been acquired during the parent's life, so that the new generation starts with a "clean slate."In addition, it is difficult to confidently assign the heritability of a given molecular character that is acquired following exposure to stress or stimuli, solely to epigenetic information rather than a subtle and perhaps hard to track change in the underlying genetic material.From a molecular view, classic epigenetic marks include DNA methylation and the modification of proteins that lie on or over the DNA sequence itself (Cedar and Bergman, 2009).Chromatin and epigenetic are not, however, interchangeable terms.Chromatin-based mechanisms of gene regulation are not necessarily epigenetic, at least not more than "classical" regulatory processes involving transcription factors.It is, again, a matter of heritability of a status in the absence of the original trigger.Epigenetics can also involve non-coding RNA molecules, small and long, providing they are passed from one cell to another or from one generation to the next to maintain phenotype (Chen et al., 2016).There is, for example, limited argument to consider microRNAs, which control mRNA (and other types of RNA) stability and translation, as epigenetic regulators.Developmental epigenetics is not the study of these inherited factors per se, nor their global distribution across the genome, but is the study of the function of epigenetic processes during development, studies which may include the developmental programming of fetal growth trajectories and adult phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcell.2018.00130

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environmental factors can influence epigenetic mechanisms, and deregulation at any point can lead to different diseases.

    “However, it is necessary to keep in mind that environmental factors can influence epigenetic mechanisms and that at any point of deregulation, different diseases can develop [94].”

    From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [94]

    The Fetal programming section (page unavailable) links early-life exposures to later obesity, metabolic disease, and mental-health risks, and describes epigenetic dysregulation as a potential mechanism. It does not establish that deregulation at any point causes disease; it says the epigenetic mechanism remains unproven and that vulnerability may depend on developmental timing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Epigenetic mechanisms modulate the normal development of mammals, including embryogenesis.

    “Epigenetic mechanisms also modulate the normal development of mammals, which undergo different changes that are necessary to ensure developmental processes such as embryogenesis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 68

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Andergassen D. Dotter C. P. Wenzel D. Sigl V. Bammer P. C. Muckenhuber M.. (2017). Mapping the mouse Allelome reveals tissue-specific regulation of allelic expression. Elife 6: e25125. 10.7554/eLife.25125 28806168 PMC5555720 · DOI
  2. Brockdorff N. (2017). Polycomb complexes in X chromosome inactivation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 372: 20170021. 10.1098/rstb.2017.0021 28947664 PMC5627167 · DOI
  3. Chen Q. Yan W. Duan E. (2016). Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 733– 743. 10.1038/nrg.2016.106 27694809 PMC5441558 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cleaton M. A. Edwards C. A. Ferguson-Smith A. C. (2014). Phenotypic outcomes of imprinted gene models in mice: elucidation of pre- and postnatal functions of imprinted genes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 15, 93– 126. 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153441 24898037 · DOI
  5. Creeth H. D. J. McNamara G. I. Tunster S. J. Boque-Sastre R. Allen B. Sumption L. (2018). Maternal care boosted by paternal imprinting in mammals. PLoS Biol. 16: e2006599. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006599 30063711 PMC6067684 · DOI
  6. Curley J. P. Champagne F. A. (2016). Influence of maternal care on the developing brain: mechanisms, temporal dynamics and sensitive periods. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 40, 52– 66. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2015.11.001 26616341 PMC4783284 · DOI
  7. de Lamarck J. B (1830) Philosophie Zoologique, Nouvelle Edition Tome Premier. Paris: Germer Bailleres.
  8. Gluckman P. D. Hanson M. A. (2004). The developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15, 183– 187. 10.1016/j.tem.2004.03.002 15109618 · DOI
  9. Greally J. M. (2017). Population epigenetics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 1, 84– 89. 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.01.004 28367533 PMC5373102 · DOI
  10. Greally J. M. (2018). A user's guide to the ambiguous word ‘epigenetics'. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 207– 208. 10.1038/nrm.2017.135 29339796 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Iurlaro M. von Meyenn F. Reik W. (2017). DNA methylation homeostasis in human and mouse development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 43, 101– 109. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.02.003 28260631 · DOI
  12. Janssen A. B. Kertes D. A. McNamara G. I. Braithwaite E. C. Creeth H. D. Glover V. I.. (2016). A role for the placenta in programming maternal mood and childhood behavioural disorders. J. Neuroendocrinol. 28. 10.1111/jne.12373 26836228 PMC4988512 · DOI
  13. John R. M. Surani M. A. (1996). Imprinted genes and regulation of gene expression by epigenetic inheritance. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 348– 353. 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80008-1 8743885 · DOI
  14. Lämke J. Bäurle I. (2017). Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol. 18: 124. 10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6 28655328 PMC5488299 · DOI
  15. Lyko F. (2018). The DNA methyltransferase family: a versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 81– 92. 10.1038/nrg.2017.80 29033456 · DOI
  16. McNamara G. I. Creeth H. D. J. Harrison D. J. Tansey K. E. Andrews R. M. Isles A. R. (2018). Loss of offspring Peg3 reduces neonatal ultrasonic vocalizations and increases maternal anxiety in wild-type mothers. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 440– 450. 10.1093/hmg/ddx412 29186532 PMC5886183 · DOI
  17. Okada Y. Yamaguchi K. (2017). Epigenetic modifications and reprogramming in paternal pronucleus: sperm, preimplantation embryo, and beyond. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 1957– 1967. 10.1007/s00018-016-2447-z 28050628 PMC11107594 · DOI
  18. Perino M. Veenstra G. J. (2016). chromatin control of developmental dynamics and plasticity. Dev. Cell 38, 610– 620. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.004 27676434 · DOI
  19. Sahakyan A. Plath K. Rougeulle C. (2017). Regulation of X-chromosome dosage compensation in human: mechanisms and model systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372: 20160363. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0363. 28947660 PMC5627163 · DOI
  20. Saksouk N. Simboeck E. Déjardin J. (2015). Constitutive heterochromatin formation and transcription in mammals. Epigenet. Chromat. 8: 3. 10.1186/1756-8935-8-3 25788984 PMC4363358 · DOI
  21. Thakore P. I. Black J. B. Hilton I. B. Gersbach C. A. (2016). Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation. Nat. Methods 13, 127– 137. 10.1038/nmeth.3733 26820547 PMC4922638 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Van de Pette M. Abbas A. Feytout A. McNamara G. Bruno L. To W. K.. (2017). Visualizing changes in cdkn1c expression links early-life adversity to imprint mis-regulation in adults. Cell Rep. 18 1090– 1099. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.010 28147266 PMC5300902 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Vogt G. (2017). Facilitation of environmental adaptation and evolution by epigenetic phenotype variation: insights from clonal, invasive, polyploid, and domesticated animals. Environ. Epigenet. 3: dvx002. 10.1093/eep/dvx002t 29492304 PMC5804542 · DOI
  24. Wu G. Bazer F. W. Cudd T. A. Meininger C. J. Spencer T. E. (2004). Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 134, 2169– 2172. 10.1093/jn/134.9.2169 15333699 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
John, R. M., & Rougeulle, C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
John, Rosalind M.
Venue
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2018-10-11
Volume
6
Pages
130-130
ISSN
2296-634X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897087090
Cited by
68
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Health and Care Research Wales
  • Waterloo Foundation
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR 11 IDEX 0005-02, ANR-11-LABX-0071, IDEX-0005, ANR-11-IDEX, ANR-11-IDEX-0005, ANR-14-CE10-0017)
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Medical Research Council (BB/P008623/1, MR/M013960, MR/M013960/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P008623/1, BB/P002307/1, BB/P008623, BB/P002307)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
epigenetics, developmental epigenetics, epigenetic heritability, epigenetic reprogramming, DNA methylation, chromatin, epigenetic modifications, epimutations, cell identity, lineage determination, epigenetic memory, epigenetic plasticity, epigenetic inheritance, epigenetic silencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review