Cited by 257Catalysts for Methane ReformingProcess Optimization and IntegrationCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Process Advantages of Direct CO2 to Methanol Synthesis

Open access
Marlin, Dana S., Sarron, Emeric, Sigurbjörnsson, Ómar·2018·Frontiers in Chemistry

Abstract

Developing a laboratory scale or pilot scale chemical process into industrial scale is not trivial. The direct conversion of CO2 to methanol, and concomitant production of hydrogen from water electrolysis on large scale, are no exception. However, when successful, there are certain benefits to this process over the conventional process for producing methanol, both economic and environmental. In this article, we highlight some aspects that are unique to the process of converting pure CO2 to methanol. Starting from pure CO2 and a separate pure source of H2, rather than a mixture of CO, CO2 and H2 as is the case with syngas, simplifies the chemistry, and therefore also changes the reaction and purification processes from conventional methanol producing industrial plants. At the core of the advantages is that the reaction impurities are essentially limited to only water and dissolved CO2 in the crude methanol. In this paper we focus on several aspects of the process that direct conversion of CO2 to methanol enjoys over existing methods from conventional syngas. In particular, we discuss processes for removing CO2 from a methanol synthesis intermediate product stream by way of a stripper unit in an overhead stream of a distillation column, as well as aspects of a split tower design for the distillation column with an integrated vapo-condenser and optionally also featuring mechanical vapor re-compression. Lastly, we highlight some differences in reactor design for the present system over those used in conventional plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fchem.2018.00446

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With a high recycling ratio in the synthesis process, CO2-to-methanol conversion rates approach 100%.

    “With a high recycling ratio in the synthesis process, CO2-to-methanol conversion rates approach 100 % [29]”

    From Locked in on RFNBOs – Will EU mandates for drop-in synthetic aviation fuels lead to decreased energy- and cost-efficiency? (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The “Gas stripper for removal of light ends” section says recycling removed CO2 to the reactor creates a loop that may ultimately convert all the CO2 into methanol. That supports the possibility of near-complete conversion through recycling, but the paper does not give a high recycling ratio or report conversion rates approaching 100%. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Akhtar R. Palagiano C. (eds.). (2018). Climate Change and Air Pollution. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, AG.
  2. Lorenz T. Bertau M. Schmidt F. Plass L. (2014). Methanol production from CO2, Section 4.8.2.3, in Methanol: The Basic Chemical and Energy Feedstock of the Future, eds. Bertau M. Offermanns H. Plass L. Schmidt F. Wernicke H-J. (Heidelberg: Springer), 271.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marlin, D. S., Sarron, E., & Sigurbjörnsson, Ó.
Corresponding author
Marlin, Dana S.
Venue
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
6
Pages
446-446
ISSN
2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892805921
Cited by
257
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
methanol synthesis, scale-up, methanol purification, distillation column, mechanical vapor recompression, reactor design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review