Cited by 75Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesNonlinear Optical Materials StudiesLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials

Two-Photon Absorption: An Open Door to the NIR-II Biological Window?

Open access
Shaw, Paige A., Forsyth, Ewan, Haseeb, Fizza, Yang, Shufan, Bradley, Mark, Klausen, Maxime·2022·Frontiers in Chemistry

Abstract

The way in which photons travel through biological tissues and subsequently become scattered or absorbed is a key limitation for traditional optical medical imaging techniques using visible light. In contrast, near-infrared wavelengths, in particular those above 1000 nm, penetrate deeper in tissues and undergo less scattering and cause less photo-damage, which describes the so-called “second biological transparency window”. Unfortunately, current dyes and imaging probes have severely limited absorption profiles at such long wavelengths, and molecular engineering of novel NIR-II dyes can be a tedious and unpredictable process, which limits access to this optical window and impedes further developments. Two-photon (2P) absorption not only provides convenient access to this window by doubling the absorption wavelength of dyes, but also increases the possible resolution. This review aims to provide an update on the available 2P instrumentation and 2P luminescent materials available for optical imaging in the NIR-II window.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fchem.2022.921354

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 183 · Cited by 75

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eisele M. (2020). Simplifying Two-Photon Microscopy. Wiley Analytical Science.
  2. Zhang N.-N. Lu C.-Y. Chen M.-J. Xu X.-L. Shu G.-F. Du Y.-Z. (2021). Recent Advances in Near-Infrared II Imaging Technology for Biological Detection. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 132. 10.1186/s12951-021-00870-z PMC8112043 33971910 · DOI

Authors
Shaw, P. A., Forsyth, E., Haseeb, F., Yang, S., Bradley, M., & Klausen, M.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Klausen, Maxime
Venue
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2022-06-24
Volume
10
Pages
921354-921354
ISSN
2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283359935
Cited by
75
References
183
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T020997 EP/R018669/1 EP/R005257 EP/L016559)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Keywords
two-photon absorption, NIR-II window, near-infrared dyes, two-photon luminescence, optical imaging, tissue penetration depth, light scattering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review