Cited by 52Catalysts for Methane ReformingThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Issues and challenges of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts

Open access
Amin, Muhammad, Usman, Muhammad, Kella, Tatinaidu, Khan, Wasim Ullah, Khan, Imtiaz Afzal, Hoon Lee, Kang·2024·Frontiers in Chemistry

Abstract

Depletion of oil and gas resources is a major concern for researchers and the global community. Researchers are trying to develop a way to overcome these issues using the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) process. The FTS reaction converts a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide gases into a liquid fuel. The reactions are performed in the reactor and in the presence of a catalyst. A series of catalysts, such as iron, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium, have been used for the FTS process. In iron-based catalysts, the Fe 5 C phase is the active phase that produces C 5+ hydrocarbons. At higher conversion rates, the presence of water in the products is a problem for cobalt catalysts because it can trigger catalyst deactivation mechanisms. Ni-based catalysts play key roles as base catalysts, promoters, and photothermal catalysts in FTS reactions to produce different useful hydrocarbons. Ruthenium catalysts offer not only high activity but also selectivity toward long-chain hydrocarbons. Moreover, depending on the Ru particle size and interaction with the oxide support, the catalyst properties can be tuned to enhance the catalytic activity during FTS. The detailed reaction pathways based on catalyst properties are explained in this article. This review article describes the issues and challenges associated with catalysts used for the FTS process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fchem.2024.1462503

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upgraded syngas can be catalytically converted into liquid hydrocarbon fuels, resembling gasoline and diesel, via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.

    “A prominent application for upgraded syngas is its catalytic conversion into liquid hydrocarbon fuels, resembling gasoline and diesel, via the F-T synthesis [147,148].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [148]

    The Introduction says Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalytically converts syngas into hydrocarbons, and section 3 reports liquid products from syngas. Section 5.1 mentions gasoline-type fuels, but the copy does not establish the diesel comparison or specifically discuss upgraded syngas as the feedstock. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Enger B. C. Holmen A. (2012b). Nickel and fischer-tropsch synthesis. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 54, 437– 488. 10.1080/01614940.2012.670088 · DOI
  2. Liu Q. Sun J. Feng Q. Ji S. Wang Z. jun (2020b). A La-promoted Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst with superior methanation performance for the production of synthetic natural gas. Catal. Today 339, 127– 134. 10.1016/J.CATTOD.2019.07.034 · DOI
  3. López-Tinoco J. Mendoza-Cruz R. Bazán-Díaz L. Karuturi S. C. Martinelli M. Cronauer D. C. (2020). The preparation and characterization of co–ni nanoparticles and the testing of a heterogenized co–ni/alumina catalyst for co hydrogenation. Catalysts 10, 18. 10.3390/catal10010018 · DOI
  4. Suo Y. Yao Y. Zhang Y. Xing S. Yuan Z. Y. (2022b). Recent advances in cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. J. Industrial Eng. Chem. 115, 92– 119. 10.1016/J.JIEC.2022.08.026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amin, M., Usman, M., Kella, T., Khan, W. U., Khan, I. A., & Hoon Lee, K.
Affiliations
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Venue
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2024-09-11
Volume
12
Pages
1462503-1462503
ISSN
2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402451789
Cited by
52
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Environment
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (RS-2024-00335526)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, catalysts, iron catalysts, cobalt catalysts, nickel catalysts, ruthenium catalysts, liquid fuels, hydrocarbon selectivity, reaction pathways, oxide supports, photothermal catalysis, basic catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review