CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What kind of a problem is loneliness? Representations of connectedness and participation from a study of telepresence technologies in the UK

Hughes, Gemma, Moore, Lucy, Hennessy, Megan, Sandset, Tony, Jentoft, Elian E., Haldar, Marit·2024·Frontiers in Digital Health
DOI 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304085PMC PMC10910053
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Loneliness is represented in UK policy as a public health problem with consequences in terms of individual suffering, population burden and service use. However, loneliness is historically and culturally produced; manifestations of loneliness and social isolation also require social and cultural analysis. We explored meanings of loneliness and social isolation in the UK 2020–2022 and considered what the solutions of telepresence technologies reveal about the problems they are used to address. Through qualitative methods we traced the introduction and use of two telepresence technologies and representations of these, and other technologies, in policy and UK media. Our dataset comprises interviews, fieldnotes, policy documents, grey literature and newspaper articles. We found loneliness was represented as a problem of individual human connection and of collective participation in social life, with technology understood as having the potential to enhance and inhibit connections and participation. Technologically-mediated connections were frequently perceived as inferior to in-person contact, particularly in light of the enforced social isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that addressing loneliness requires attending to other, related, health and social problems and introducing technological solutions requires integration into the complex social and organisational dynamics that shape technology adoption. We conclude that loneliness is primarily understood as a painful lack of co-presence, no longer regarded as simply a subjective experience, but as a social and policy problem demanding resolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304085

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Overview of study design.
Figure 1 Overview of study design.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Summary of findings and conclusion.
Figure 2 Summary of findings and conclusion.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Murthy, 2021, Together: Loneliness, Health & What Happens When We Find Connection
  2. Taylor, 2023, The state of loneliness and social isolation research: current knowledge and future directions, BMC Public Health, 23, 1049, 10.1186/s12889-023-15967-3 · DOI
  3. Hertz, 2021, The Lonely Century: Currency
  4. 2018, A Connected Society: A Strategy for Tackling Loneliness—Laying the Foundations for Change
  5. Bound Alberti, 2019, A Biography of Loneliness: The History of an Emotion
  6. Malli, 2023, Experiences and meaning of loneliness beyond age and group identity, Sociol Health Illn, 45, 70, 10.1111/1467-9566.13539 · DOI
  7. Franklin, 2019, Towards an understanding of loneliness among Australian men: gender cultures, embodied expression and the social bases of belonging, J Sociol, 55, 124, 10.1177/1440783318777309 · DOI
  8. Cacioppo, 2008, Loneliness
  9. McGraw, 1995, Loneliness, its nature and forms: an existential perspective, Man World, 28, 43, 10.1007/BF01278458 · DOI
  10. Perlman, 1981, Towards a social psychology of loneliness, 31
  11. Bacchi, 2012, Introducing the “what’s the problem represented to be?” approach, 21, 10.1017/UPO9780987171856.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jackson, 1999, Dualism, duality and the complexity of economic institutions, Int J Soc Econ, 26, 545, 10.1108/03068299910215997 · DOI
  13. Giddens, 2013, The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration
  14. Bowlby, 1973, Affectional bonds: their nature and origin, 38
  15. Kraut, 1998, Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?, Am Psychol, 53, 1017, 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Turkle, 2011, Alone Together : Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other
  17. Yildirim, 2023, Examining online behaviors of young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic social isolation period with regard to life satisfaction, loneliness, and hostility, Psychol Rep, 332941231169671, 10.1177/00332941231169671 · DOI
  18. Fang, 2019, Loneliness shapes the relationship between information and communications technology use and psychological adjustment among older adults, Gerontology, 65, 198, 10.1159/000495461 · DOI
  19. Horst, 2021, Demographic and psychographic factors of social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: the importance of technology confidence, Front Public Health, 9, 749515, 10.3389/fpubh.2021.749515 · DOI
  20. Doryab, 2019, Identifying behavioral phenotypes of loneliness and social isolation with passive sensing: statistical analysis, data mining and machine learning of smartphone and fitbit data, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 7, e13209, 10.2196/13209 · DOI
  21. Latikka, 2021, Older adults’ loneliness, social isolation, and physical information and communication technology in the era of ambient assisted living: a systematic literature review, J Med Internet Res, 23, e28022, 10.2196/28022 · DOI
  22. Prabhu, 2022, Sensor-based assessment of social isolation and loneliness in older adults: a survey, Sensors, 22, 9944, 10.3390/s22249944 · DOI
  23. Qirtas, 2022, Loneliness and social isolation detection using passive sensing techniques: scoping review, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 10, e34638, 10.2196/34638 · DOI
  24. Site, 2022, Managing perceived loneliness and social-isolation levels for older adults: a survey with focus on wearables-based solutions, Sensors, 22, 1108, 10.3390/s22031108 · DOI
  25. Gadbois, 2022, Findings from talking tech: a technology training pilot intervention to reduce loneliness and social isolation among homebound older adults, Innov Aging, 6, igac040, 10.1093/geroni/igac040 · DOI
  26. Mullins, 2020, Internet programming to reduce loneliness and social isolation in aging, Res Gerontol Nurs, 13, 233, 10.3928/19404921-20200320-01 · DOI
  27. Murugan, 2022, Severity of loneliness, depression and perceived social support in adults in the empty nest stage of the family life cycle and the influence of using digital technology, Asian J Psychiatr, 76, 103245, 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103245 · DOI
  28. Zamir, 2018, Video-calls to reduce loneliness and social isolation within care environments for older people: an implementation study using collaborative action research, BMC Geriatr, 18, 62, 10.1186/s12877-018-0746-y · DOI
  29. Prophater, 2021, Alzheimer’s association project VITAL: a Florida statewide initiative using technology to impact social isolation and well-being, Front Public Health, 9, 720180, 10.3389/fpubh.2021.720180 · DOI
  30. Wang, 2023, CATCH-ON connect: a tablet intervention to address social isolation and loneliness, Aging Ment Health, 6, 1, 10.1080/13607863.2023.2217501 · DOI
  31. Cotterell, 2018, Preventing social isolation in older people, Maturitas, 113, 80, 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.014 · DOI
  32. Poscia, 2018, Interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation among the older people: an update systematic review, Exp Gerontol, 102, 133, 10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ibarra, 2020, A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness, J Healthc Eng, 2020, 2036842, 10.1155/2020/2036842 · DOI
  34. Freedman, 2020, Social isolation and loneliness: the new geriatric giants: approach for primary care, Can Fam Physician, 66, 176
  35. Döring, 2022, Can communication technologies reduce loneliness and social isolation in older people? A scoping review of reviews, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19, 11310, 10.3390/ijerph191811310 · DOI
  36. Rai, 2022, Digital technologies to prevent social isolation and loneliness in dementia: a systematic review, J Alzheimers Dis, 90, 513, 10.3233/JAD-220438 · DOI
  37. Chen, 2016, The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review, J Med Internet Res, 18, e18, 10.2196/jmir.4596 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Casanova, 2021, The effect of information and communication technology and social networking site use on older people’s well-being in relation to loneliness: review of experimental studies, J Med Internet Res, 23, e23588, 10.2196/23588 · DOI
  39. Shah, 2021, Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Med Internet Res, 23, e24712, 10.2196/24712 · DOI
  40. Todd, 2022, Using information and communication technology learnings to alleviate social isolation for older people during periods of mandated isolation: a review, Australas J Ageing, 41, e227, 10.1111/ajag.13041 · DOI
  41. Kadowaki, 2023, Older adults and social isolation and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrated review of patterns, effects, and interventions, Can J Aging, 42, 199, 10.1017/S0714980822000459 · DOI
  42. Kasar, 2021, Life in lockdown: social isolation, loneliness and quality of life in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review, Geriatr Nurs, 42, 1222, 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.03.010 · DOI
  43. Wu, 2020, Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge, Glob Health Res Policy, 5, 27, 10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Toh, 2022, Digital interventions for subjective and objective social isolation among individuals with mental health conditions: a scoping review, BMC Psychiatry, 22, 331, 10.1186/s12888-022-03889-0 · DOI
  45. Saltzman, 2020, Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health, Psychol Trauma, 12, S55, 10.1037/tra0000703 · DOI
  46. Gillard, 2021, Experiences of living with mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a coproduced, participatory qualitative interview study, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 56, 1447, 10.1007/s00127-021-02051-7 · DOI
  47. Thangavel, 2022, Customized information and communication technology for reducing social isolation and loneliness among older adults: scoping review, JMIR Ment Health, 9, e34221, 10.2196/34221 · DOI
  48. Jutai, 2022, The role of assistive technology in addressing social isolation, loneliness and health inequities among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 17, 248, 10.1080/17483107.2021.2021305 · DOI
  49. Masi, 2011, A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 15, 219, 10.1177/1088868310377394 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Kharicha, 2021, Managing loneliness: a qualitative study of older people’s views, Aging Ment Health, 25, 1206, 10.1080/13607863.2020.1729337 · DOI
  51. Ojembe, 2022, Understanding social and emotional loneliness among black older adults: a scoping review, J Appl Gerontol, 41, 2594, 10.1177/07334648221118357 · DOI
  52. Weiss, 1973, Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation
  53. Burholt, 2020, Technology-mediated communication in familial relationships: moderated-mediation models of isolation and loneliness, Gerontologist, 60, 1202, 10.1093/geront/gnaa040 · DOI
  54. Adedeji, 2023, COVID-19 experiences of social isolation and loneliness among older adults in Africa: a scoping review, Front Public Health, 11, 1158716, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1158716 · DOI
  55. Treadaway, 2023, HUG: a compassionate approach to designing for wellbeing in dementia care, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20, 4410, 10.3390/ijerph20054410 · DOI
  56. Hung, 2019, The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review, BMC Geriatr, 19, 232, 10.1186/s12877-019-1244-6 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Dhakal, 2023, Better together: social contact and loneliness among U.S. older adults during COVID-19, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 78, 359, 10.1093/geronb/gbac136 · DOI
  58. Johannessen, 2021, Protocol for “virtual presence”: a qualitative study of the cultural dialectic between loneliness and technology, BMJ Open, 11, e047157, 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047157 · DOI
  59. Bacchi, 2000, Policy as discourse: what does it mean? Where does it get us?, Discourse: Stud Cult Politics Educ, 21, 45, 10.1080/01596300050005493 · DOI
  60. 2017, Combatting Loneliness One Conversation at a Time: A Call to Action, 1
  61. Kitchen, 2020, Can robots end isolation and disruption for unwell students?, Teach Times, 1, 6
  62. 2021, Evaluation of the Alternative Provision Innovation Fund (APIF)
  63. Jopling, 2015, Promising Approaches to Reducing Loneliness and Isolation in Later Life
  64. 2021, Loneliness Engagement Fund
  65. Mroz, 2021, Changing media depictions of remote consulting in COVID-19: analysis of UK newspapers, Br J Gen Pract, 71, e1, 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0967 · DOI
  66. 2022, Timeline of UK Government Coronavirus Lockdowns and Restrictions, 1
  67. Elliott, 2005, Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 10.4135/9780857020246 · DOI
  68. Rasmussen, 2021, Warm technology against loneliness among the elderly? A script analysis of the communication solution KOMP, Tidsskr Samfunnsforsk, 62, 353, 10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2021-04-03 · DOI
  69. Johannessen, 2023, Educational purity and technological danger: understanding scepticism towards the use of telepresence robots in school, Br J Sociol Educ, 44, 703, 10.1080/01425692.2023.2203360 · DOI
  70. Oborn, 2021, Institutional logics and innovation in times of crisis: telemedicine as digital “PPE”, Inf Organ, 31, 100340, 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100340 · DOI
  71. Miller, 2016, How the World Changed Social Media, 10.2307/j.ctt1g69z35 · DOI
  72. Hobson, 2022, Reconceptualising Loneliness in London Neighbourly Lab, Campaign to End Loneliness, What Works Centre for Wellbeing, 1
  73. 2021, Emerging Together: The Tackling Loneliness Network Action Plan
  74. 2019, “Let’s Talk Loneliness” Campaign Launched to Tackle Stigma of Feeling Alone [Press Release]
  75. Barbosa Neves, 2023, When technologies are not enough: the challenges of digital interventions to address loneliness in later life, Sociol Res Online, 28, 150, 10.1177/13607804211029298 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, G., Moore, L., Hennessy, M., Sandset, T., Jentoft, E. E., & Haldar, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Digital Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2024-02-19
Volume
6
ISSN
2673-253X
DOI
10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304085
PMC
PMC10910053
Cited by
7
References
8
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Research Council of Norway (301840)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review