CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generative AI and education: dynamic personalization of pupils’ school learning material with ChatGPT

Open access
Jauhiainen, Jussi S., Garagorry Guerra, Agustín·2024·Frontiers in Education
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The widespread use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has seen significant growth. This rise prompted discussions on integrating these technologies into school education. However, the practical implementation, testing, and assessment of generative AI in primary and secondary education remained largely unexplored. This article examines the application of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4 in primary school education. A study involving 110 students aged 8–14 across grades 4–6 in two Uruguayan schools was conducted. The focus was on using generative AI for dynamic personalization of educational content during classroom lessons. In these sessions, instructional content followed the curriculum goals, and text, illustrations, and exercises were generated and dynamically adjusted based on generative AI. The findings indicate that generative AI effectively tailors school materials to match varying pupil knowledge levels. Real-time adjustments during lessons cater to individual learning needs, enhancing cognitive ergonomics. This approach not only boosts pupil motivation but also improves their performance, facilitating more effective achievement of the curriculum’s learning objectives. These results suggest a promising avenue for leveraging generative AI to personalize and optimize primary school education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cura, 2022, Challenges and opportunities for equality in education. Main barriers to accessing and using Ceibal tools for children and adolescents in Uruguay. Ceibal & UNICEF Uruguay: Montevideo
  2. Deci, 1995, Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy
  3. 2023, Digital learning environments for all contexts
  4. 2023, Search engine results for trending with “AI”, “artificial intelligence”, ChatGPT, bard, Google AI
  5. Haselton, 2005, The evolution of cognitive bias, 724
  6. Paulino, 2021, Winning attention: a Q & a with Antonis Kocheilas, CEO of Ogilvy Advertising. Ogilvy
  7. Roose, 2023, Don’t ban ChatGPT in schools. Teach with it. New York Times
  8. 2022, Protecting children from the harmful impact of food marketing: policy brief

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Garagorry Guerra, A.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Jauhiainen, Jussi S.
ORCID
Jauhiainen, Jussi S.
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2024-11-19
Volume
9
ISSN
2504-284X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
OpenAlex
W4404509460
Cited by
87
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 1
FWCI
32.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Turun Yliopisto
  • Business Finland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative AI in education, ChatGPT, personalized learning, primary education, ChatGPT-4, student motivation, student performance, cognitive ergonomics, curriculum-based instruction, AI-generated educational content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review