Cited by 6Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Description of thyroid disorders the year before conception: a population-based study.

Open access
Tena Vivó, Glòria, Parellada Esquius, Neus, Cunillera Puértolas, Oriol, Albareda Riera, Mercè, Isidro Albaladejo, Mónica, Vila Ballester, Lluís·2023·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to monitoring the prevalence of previously identified thyroid disorders and hypothyroidism monitoring before pregnancy. Material and methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of women whose pregnancies occurred between 2014 and 2016 was conducted, including 120,763 pregnancies in Catalonia (Spain). The presence of thyroid disorders in women was based on disease diagnostic codes and/or prescription of levothyroxine or antithyroid drugs. To evaluate the thyroid disorder diagnosis and monitoring, thyrotropin (TSH), free T4 (FT4), antiperoxidase antibody (TPOAb), and anti-TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) records were gathered and categorised according to the reference values of each laboratory. Results: The prevalence of recorded thyroid disorders before the last menstrual period was 5.09% for hypothyroidism and 0.64% for hyperthyroidism,showing a significant increase with age. A thyroid monitoring test was not performed in the year before the last menstrual period in approximately 40% of women with a known thyroid disorder. Amongst the women with hypothyroidism who underwent a TSH test, 31.75% showed an above-normal result. Amongst women previously unknown to have thyroid disorders, 3.12% had elevated TSH levels and 0.73% had low TSH levels. Conclusion: A high percentage of Catalan women with a known thyroid disorder were not properly monitored during the year before pregnancy. Amongst those monitored, more than one-third had TSH values outside the reference range. Therefore, it is important to evaluate women with thyroid disorders during pre-pregnancy visits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2023.1236505

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2 comparative effectiveness studies, switching levothyroxine products was not associated with clinically significant changes in thyrotropin level; one study compared generic vs brand-name levothyroxine among 17,598 US adults and the other compared switching among different generic levothyroxine products in 15,829 US adults.

    “However, in 2 comparative effectiveness studies, 64,65 switching was not associated with clinically significant changes in thyrotropin level; one of the studies included a comparison of generic vs brand-name levothyroxine among 17 598 US adults and the other study included switching among different generic levothyroxine products in 15 829 US adults.”

    From Hypothyroidism: A Review (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tena Vivó, G., Parellada Esquius, N., Cunillera Puértolas, O., Albareda Riera, M., Isidro Albaladejo, M., & Vila Ballester, L.
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2023-09-25
Volume
14
Pages
1236505-1236505
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387055467
Cited by
6
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroid dysfunction, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, preconception care, thyroid function monitoring, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, antithyroid drugs, levothyroxine, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, TSH receptor antibodies, pregnancy, prevalence, Catalonia
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Thyroid Diseases, Thyrotropin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review