The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life-Cycle Assessment of the Production of Rare-Earth Elements for Energy Applications: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Rare earth elements (REEs) are a group of seventeen elements with similar chemical properties, including fifteen in the lanthanide group, yttrium, and scandium. Due to their unique physical and chemical properties REEs gain increasing importance in many new energy technologies and systems that contribute to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel depletion (e.g., wind turbine, electric vehicles, high efficiency lighting, batteries, and hydrogen storage). However, it is well known that production of REEs is far from environmentally sustainable as it requires significant material and energy consumption while generating large amounts of air/water emissions and solid waste. Although life cycle assessment (LCA) has been accepted as the most comprehensive approach to quantify the environmental sustainability of a product or process, to date, there have been only very limited LCA studies on the production of REEs. With the continual growth of renewable energy and energy efficient technologies, global production of REEs will increase. Therefore reducing environmental footprints of REE production becomes critical and identifying environmental hotspots based on a holistic and comprehensive assessment on environmental impacts serves as an important starting point. After providing an overview of LCA methodology and a high-level description of the major REE production routes used from 1990s to today, this paper reviews the published LCA studies on the production of REEs. To date, almost all the LCA studies are based on process information collected from the operation of Mountain Pass facility in U.S. in 1990s and the operation of facilities in Bayan Obo, China. Knowledge gaps are identified and future research efforts are suggested to advance understanding on environmental impacts of REE production from the life cycle perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Categorising tools for sustainability assessment
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 · Cited by 1,407
Evaluating Rare Earth Element Availability: A Case with Revolutionary Demand from Clean Technologies
Alonso, E., Sherman, A. M., Wallington, T. J., Everson, M. P., Field, F. R., Roth, R., & Kirchain, R. E. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203518d · Cited by 1,033
Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis
Nuss, P., & Eckelman, M. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101298 · Cited by 777
Extraction and stripping of rare earths using mixtures of acidic phosphorus-based reagents
WANG, X., LI, W., & LI, D. (2011) · Journal of Rare Earths · doi:10.1016/s1002-0721(10)60470-x · Cited by 69
Cited by
Gwenzi, W., Mangori, L., Danha, C., Chaukura, N., Dunjana, N., & Sanganyado, E. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.235 · Cited by 795
Metadata
- Authors
- Navarro, J., & Zhao, F.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Energy Research
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-11-06
- Volume
- 2
- ISSN
- 2296-598X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083223575
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life-Cycle Assessment of the Production of Rare-Earth Elements for Energy Applications: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00045
- The paper
- Navarro, J., & Zhao, F. (2014). Life-Cycle Assessment of the Production of Rare-Earth Elements for Energy Applications: A Review. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.