The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils
Open accessAbstract
Microbes have a central role in soil global biogeochemical process, yet specific microbe-microbe relationships are largely unknown. Analytical approaches as network analysis may shed new lights in understanding of microbial ecology and environmental microbiology. We investigated the soil bacterial community interactions through cultivation-independent methods in several land uses common in two Brazilian biomes. Using correlation network analysis we identified bacterial genera that presented important microbial associations within the soil community. The associations revealed nonrandomly structured microbial communities and clusters of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that reflected relevant bacterial relationships. Possible keystone genera were found in each soil. Irrespective of the biome or land use studied only a small portion of OTUs showed positive or negative interaction with other members of the soil bacterial community. The more interactive genera were also more abundant however, within those genera, the abundance was not related to taxon importance as measured by the Betweenness Centrality. Most of the soil bacterial genera were important to the overall connectance of the network, whereas only few genera play a key role as connectors, mainly belonged to phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Finally it was observed that each land use presented a different set of keystone genera and that no keystone genus presented a generalized distribution. Taking into account that species interactions could be more important to soil processes than species richness and abundance, especially in complex ecosystems, this approach might represent a step forward in microbial ecology beyond the conventional studies of microbial richness and abundance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Microbial interactions: from networks to models
Faust, K., & Raes, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 · Cited by 4,141
Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities
Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.119 · Cited by 3,044
Inferring Correlation Networks from Genomic Survey Data
Friedman, J., & Alm, E. J. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687 · Cited by 2,706
Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review
Taylor, R. (1990) · Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography · doi:10.1177/875647939000600106 · Cited by 2,390
Challenges in the Quest for Keystones
Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., Menge, B. A., Bond, W. J., Mills, L. S., Daily, G., Castilla, J. C., Lubchenco, J., & Paine, R. T. (1996) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312990 · Cited by 2,018
Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy
Lennon, J. T., & Jones, S. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2504 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning
Banerjee, S., Schlaeppi, K., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1 · Cited by 3,031
Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality
Karimi, B., Maron, P. A., Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, N., Bernard, N., Gilbert, D., & Ranjard, L. (2017) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6 · Cited by 323
Spatial scale drives patterns in soil bacterial diversity
O'Brien, S. L., Gibbons, S. M., Owens, S. M., Hampton‐Marcell, J., Johnston, E. R., Jastrow, J. D., Gilbert, J. A., Meyer, F., & Antonopoulos, D. A. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13231 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Lupatini, M., Suleiman, A. K. A., Jacques, R. J. S., Antoniolli, Z. I., de Siqueira Ferreira, A., Kuramae, E. E., & Roesch, L. F. W.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-05-08
- Volume
- 2
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112304036
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00010
- The paper
- Lupatini, M., Suleiman, A. K. A., Jacques, R. J. S., Antoniolli, Z. I., de Siqueira Ferreira, A., Kuramae, E. E., & Roesch, L. F. W. (2014). Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.