Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality

Karimi, Battle, Maron, Pierre Alain, Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, Nicolas, Bernard, Nadine, Gilbert, Daniel, Ranjard, Lionel·2017·Environmental Chemistry Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bissett A, Abell GCJ, Brown M, Thrall PH, Bodrossy L, Smith MC, Baker GH, Richardsson AE (2014) Land-use and management practices affect soil ammonia oxidiser community structure, activity and connectedness. Soil Biol Biochem 78:138–148 · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.07.020
  2. Bonkowski M, Clarholm M (2012) Stimulation of plant growth through interactions of bacteria and protozoa: testing the auxiliary microbial loop hypothesis. Acta Protozool 51:237–247. doi: 10.4467/16890027AP.12.019.0765 · doi:10.4467/16890027ap.12.019.0765
  3. Ducklow HW (1994) Modeling the microbial food web. Microb Ecol 28(2):303–319 · doi:10.1007/bf00166822
  4. Gilbert D, Amblard C, Bourdier G, Francez A (1998) The microbial loop at the surface of a peatland: structure, function, and impact of nutrient input. Microb Ecol 35:83–93 · doi:10.1007/s002489900062
  5. Jassey VEJ, Meyer C, Dupuy C, Bernard N, Mitchell EAD, Toussaint M-L, Metian M, Chatelain AP, Gilbert D (2013) To what extent do food preferences explain the trophic position of heterotrophic and mixotrophic microbial consumers in a Sphagnum peatland? Microb Ecol 66(3):571–580. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0262-8 · doi:10.1007/s00248-013-0262-8
  6. Navas-cortés JA, Hau B, Jiménez-díaz RM (2000) Yield loss in chickpeas in relation to development of Fusarium wilt epidemics. Phytopathology 90(11):1269–1278 · doi:10.1094/phyto.2000.90.11.1269
  7. Rosenberg K, Bertaux J, Krome K, Hartmann A, Scheu S, Bonkowski M (2009) Soil amoebae rapidly change bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. ISME J 3(6):675–684. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.11 · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.11
  8. Soundar S, Chandra TS (1987) Cellulose degradation by a mixed bacterial culture. J Ind Microbiol 2(1):257–265 · doi:10.1007/bf01569428
  9. Subba-Rao RV, Alexander M (1985) Bacterial and fungal cometabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis (4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) and its breakdown products. Appl Environ Microbiol 49(3):509–516 · doi:10.1128/aem.49.3.509-516.1985
  10. Wells J, Sapers G, Fett W, Butterfield J, Jones J, Bouzar H, Miller FC (1996) Postharvest discoloration of the cultivated mushroom Agaricus bisporus caused by Pseudomonas tolaasii, P’.reactans’ and P’.gingeri’. Phytopathology 86(10):1098–1104 · doi:10.1094/phyto-86-1098

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Karimi, B., Maron, P. A., Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, N., Bernard, N., Gilbert, D., & Ranjard, L.
Venue
Environmental Chemistry Letters
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
265-281
ISSN
  • 1610-3653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-3661
OpenAlex
W2594916012
Cited by
323
References
102
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6
The paper
Karimi, B., Maron, P. A., Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, N., Bernard, N., Gilbert, D., & Ranjard, L. (2017). Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality. Environmental Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.