The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Phosphorus Removal Technologies and Their Applicability to Small-Scale Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems
Open accessAbstract
The removal of phosphorus (P) from domestic wastewater is primarily to reduce the potential for eutrophication in receiving waters, and is mandated and common in many countries. However, most P-removal technologies have been developed for use at larger wastewater treatment plants that have economies-of-scale, rigorous monitoring, and in-house operating expertise. Smaller treatment plants often do not have these luxuries, which is problematic because there is concern that P releases from small treatment systems may have greater environmental impact than previously believed. Here P-removal technologies are reviewed with the goal of determining which treatment options are amenable to small-scale applications. Significant progress has been made in developing some technologies for small-scale application, namely sorptive media. However, as this review shows, there is a shortage of treatment technologies for P-removal at smaller scales, particularly sustainable and reliable options that demand minimal operating and maintenance expertise or are suited to northern latitudes. In view of emerging regulatory pressure, investment should be made in developing new or adapting existing P-removal technologies, specifically for implementation at small-scale treatment works.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Algae-bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications
Ramanan, R., Kim, B.-H., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003 · Cited by 1,301
Glemser, M., Heining, M., Schmidt, J., Becker, A., Garbe, D., Buchholz, R., & Brück, T. (2016) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-015-7144-6 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Ahmed, S. F., Mofijur, M., Nuzhat, S., Chowdhury, A. T., Rafa, N., Uddin, M. A., Inayat, A., Mahlia, T. M. I., Ong, H. C., Chia, W. Y., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125912 · Cited by 965
Performance evaluation of dye wastewater treatment technologies: A review
Solayman, H. M., Hossen, M. A., Abd Aziz, A., Yahya, N. Y., Leong, K. H., Sim, L. C., Monir, M. U., & Zoh, K.-D. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.109610 · Cited by 658
Akinnawo, S. O. (2023) · Environmental Challenges · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2023.100733 · Cited by 585
Interactions of microalgae-bacteria consortia for nutrient removal from wastewater: A review
Fallahi, A., Rezvani, F., Asgharnejad, H., Khorshidi Nazloo, E., Hajinajaf, N., & Higgins, B. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129878 · Cited by 404
Progress and challenges of contaminate removal from wastewater using microalgae biomass
Ahmed, S. F., Mofijur, M., Parisa, T. A., Islam, N., Kusumo, F., Inayat, A., Le, V. G., Badruddin, I. A., Khan, T. M. Y., & Ong, H. C. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131656 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Bunce, J. T., Ndam, E., Ofiteru, I. D., Moore, A., & Graham, D. W.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-02-22
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791800030
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Phosphorus Removal Technologies and Their Applicability to Small-Scale Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00008
- The paper
- Bunce, J. T., Ndam, E., Ofiteru, I. D., Moore, A., & Graham, D. W. (2018). A Review of Phosphorus Removal Technologies and Their Applicability to Small-Scale Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.