The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance evaluation of dye wastewater treatment technologies: A review
Abstract
Dye wastewater released from several dyes induced industries are harmful towards the living, non-living environment and human. Consequently, existence of dye in water bodies is becoming a rising concern to environmentalists and citizens. Dye wastewater should be treated prior to release in an open water body to minimize its negative impacts. A long term sustainable and efficient treatment methods should be established to reduce and overcome the impacts. Although there have been significant advances in the management and treatment of such effluent using physical, chemical and biological methods. However, due to lack of information on effective dye removal methods, it is difficult to decide on a single unique technique that resolves the prevailing dye wastewater. Therefore, this paper reviews recent research on various (physical, chemical, biological, advanced oxidation process (AOPs) and hybrid) dye removal methods to compare efficiency, evaluation performance, merits and demerits. Among the existing methods, most of them have a common disadvantage which is the generation of secondary pollutes, takes long time and costly. This paper especially highlights AOPs method for dye removal as these are known as one of the promising and most effective dye removal techniques these days. This paper also suggests the application of AOPs methods possess the best performance in terms of faster dye removing as well as cost effective, time oriented and environmentally friendly. Additionally, this paper addressed the difficulties and future prospects of this emerging method that links to sustainable development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Al-Tohamy, R., Ali, S. S., Li, F., Okasha, K. M., Mahmoud, Y. A.-G., Elsamahy, T., Jiao, H., Fu, Y., & Sun, J. (2022) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · Cited by 3,479
Lellis, B., Fávaro-Polonio, C. Z., Pamphile, J. A., & Polonio, J. C. (2019) · Biotechnology Research and Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · Cited by 2,778
Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review
Katheresan, V., Kansedo, J., & Lau, S. Y. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 · Cited by 2,752
Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review
Yaseen, D. A., & Scholz, M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z · Cited by 2,052
A Critical Review on Textile Wastewater Treatments: Possible Approaches
Holkar, C. R., Jadhav, A. J., Pinjari, D. V., Mahamuni, N. M., & Pandit, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.090 · Cited by 1,927
Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review
Obotey Ezugbe, E., & Rathilal, S. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10050089 · Cited by 1,434
Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: a critical review
Dutta, S., Gupta, B., Srivastava, S. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ma00354b · Cited by 1,296
Kishor, R., Purchase, D., Saratale, G. D., Saratale, R. G., Ferreira, L. F. R., Bilal, M., Chandra, R., & Bharagava, R. N. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.105012 · Cited by 1,118
Samsami, S., Mohamadizaniani, M., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., Rene, E. R., & Firoozbahr, M. (2020) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.034 · Cited by 1,006
Ahmed, S. F., Mofijur, M., Nuzhat, S., Chowdhury, A. T., Rafa, N., Uddin, M. A., Inayat, A., Mahlia, T. M. I., Ong, H. C., Chia, W. Y., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125912 · Cited by 965
Cited by
Hama Aziz, K. H., Fatah, N. M., & Muhammad, K. T. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.232033 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Solayman, H. M., Hossen, M. A., Abd Aziz, A., Yahya, N. Y., Leong, K. H., Sim, L. C., Monir, M. U., & Zoh, K.-D.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 109610
- ISSN
- 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-3437
- OpenAlex
- W4322722917
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 153
- FWCI
- 50.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance evaluation of dye wastewater treatment technologies: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109610
- The paper
- Solayman, H. M., Hossen, M. A., Abd Aziz, A., Yahya, N. Y., Leong, K. H., Sim, L. C., Monir, M. U., & Zoh, K.-D. (2023). Performance evaluation of dye wastewater treatment technologies: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.