Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated Remediation Processes Toward Heavy Metal Removal/Recovery From Various Environments-A Review

Open access
Selvi, Adikesavan, Rajasekar, Aruliah, Theerthagiri, Jayaraman, Ananthaselvam, Azhagesan, Sathishkumar, Kuppusamy, Madhavan, Jagannathan, Rahman, Pattanathu K. S. M.·2019·Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract

Addressing heavy metal pollution isone of the hot areas of environmental research.Despite natural existence, various anthropomorphic sources have contributed to an unusually high concentration of heavy metals in the environment.They are characterized by their long persistence in natural environment leading to serious health consequences in humans, animals, and plants even at very low concentrations (1 or 2 μg in some cases). Failure of strict regulations by government authorities is also to be blamed for heavy metal pollution. Several individual treatments, namely, physical, chemical and biological are being implied to remove heavy metals from the environment.But, they all face challenges in terms of expensiveness and in-situ treatment failure.Hence, integrated processes are gaining popularity as it is reported to achieve the goal effectively in various environmental matrices and will overcome a major drawback of large scale implementation.Integrated processes are the combination of two different methods to achieve a synergistic and an effective effort to remove heavy metals. Most of the review articles published so far mainly focus on individual methods on specific heavy metal removal, that too from a particular environmental matrix only.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review of this kind that summarizes on various integrated processes for heavy metal removal from all environmental matrices. In addition, we too have discussed on the advantages and disadvantages of each integrated process, with a special mention of the few methods that needs more research attention. To conclude, integrated processes areproved as a right remedial option which has been detaily discussed in the present review. However, more research focus on the process is needed to challenge the in-situ operative conditions. We believe, this review on integrated processes will surely evoke a research thrust that could give rise to novel remediation projects for research community in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00066

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Selvi, A., Rajasekar, A., Theerthagiri, J., Ananthaselvam, A., Sathishkumar, K., Madhavan, J., & Rahman, P. K. S. M.
Venue
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2019-05-22
Volume
7
ISSN
2296-665X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945899179
Cited by
384
References
95
FWCI
17.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Remediation Processes Toward Heavy Metal Removal/Recovery From Various Environments-A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00066
The paper
Selvi, A., Rajasekar, A., Theerthagiri, J., Ananthaselvam, A., Sathishkumar, K., Madhavan, J., & Rahman, P. K. S. M. (2019). Integrated Remediation Processes Toward Heavy Metal Removal/Recovery From Various Environments-A Review. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.