Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Earthworms Building Up Soil Microbiota, a Review

Open access
Medina-Sauza, Regina M., Álvarez-Jiménez, Marycruz, Delhal, Alix, Reverchon, Frédérique, Blouin, Manuel, Guerrero-Analco, José A., Cerdán, Carlos R., Guevara, Roger, Villain, Luc, Barois, Isabelle·2019·Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract

The positive effect of earthworms on soil processes and plant growth has been extensively documented. They enrich the soil in nutrients through their casts and improve soil structure and aeration by the burrows and galleries they form, thereby creating the functional domain called drilosphere that make them biochemical and physical ecosystem engineers. The capacity of earthworms to decompose organic matter has been attributed to the microbial communities that inhabit their digestive track or the structures they build. However, the nature and mechanisms of soil microbial community modifications and how these changes impacts soil microbial processes are still unclear. Do earthworms reduce microbial abundance and activity because they feed on microorganisms or do they select and stimulate specific microbial groups? It has been shown that the production of mucus during gut transit is responsible for a priming effect, referred to as the “Sleeping Beauty Paradox”, that enhances microbial activity, which in turn promotes the digestion of recalcitrant organic matter. Recent reports showed that specific bacterial groups increased in soils where earthworms are present. In addition, the earthworm digestive track, casts and biopores are considered hotspots for nutrient turnover with enhanced bacterial growth and potentially specific bacterial communities, that mineralize nitrogen and phosphorus or produce metabolites known for their plant growth promoting effects. The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing literature concerning the influence of earthworms on the structure and function of soil bacterial communities, as well as to understand how earthworm-induced changes in the soil microbiota would in turn impact soil processes, particularly those in the rhizosphere that are involved in plant growth and health. We propose a framework for earthworms – microbiota interactions and recommend further research to be dedicated at deciphering microbial processes occurring in the drilosphere, a hotspot where bacterial richness and diversity are enhanced and which is critical for plant-soil interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00081

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Medina-Sauza, R. M., Álvarez-Jiménez, M., Delhal, A., Reverchon, F., Blouin, M., Guerrero-Analco, J. A., Cerdán, C. R., Guevara, R., Villain, L., & Barois, I.
Venue
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
7
ISSN
2296-665X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964004288
Cited by
403
References
110
FWCI
25.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Earthworms Building Up Soil Microbiota, a Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00081
The paper
Medina-Sauza, R. M., Álvarez-Jiménez, M., Delhal, A., Reverchon, F., Blouin, M., Guerrero-Analco, J. A., Cerdán, C. R., Guevara, R., Villain, L., & Barois, I. (2019). Earthworms Building Up Soil Microbiota, a Review. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.