Ingestion and depuration of microplastics by a planktivorous coral reef fish, Pomacentrus amboinensis
Open accessAbstract
Microplastics are ubiquitous contaminants in marine environments and organisms. Concerns about potential impacts on marine organisms are usually associated with uptake of microplastics, especially via ingestion. This study used environmentally relevant exposure conditions to investigate microplastic ingestion and depuration kinetics of the planktivorous damselfish,Pomacentrus amboinensis. Irregular shaped blue polypropylene (PP) particles (longest length 125–250 μm), and regular shaped blue polyester (PET) fibers (length 600–700 μm) were selected based on physical and chemical characteristics of microplastics commonly reported in the marine environment, including in coral reef ecosystems. Individual adult damselfish were exposed to a single dose of PP particles and PET fibers at concentrations reported for waters of the Great Barrier Reef (i.e., environmentally relevant concentrations, ERC), or future projected higher concentrations (10x ERC, 100x ERC). Measured microplastic concentrations were similar to their nominal values, confirming that PP particles and PET fibers were present at the desired concentrations and available for ingestion by individual damselfish. Throughout the 128-h depuration period, the 88 experimental fish were sampled 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128-h post microplastic exposure and their gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) analyzed for ingested microplastics. While damselfish ingested both experimental microplastics at all concentrations, body burden, and depuration rates of PET fibers were significantly larger and longer, respectively, compared to PP particles. For both microplastic types, exposure to higher concentrations led to an increase in body burden and lower depuration rates. These findings confirm ingestion of PP particles and PET fibers byP. amboinensisand demonstrate for the first time the influence of microplastic characteristics and concentrations on body burden and depuration rates. Finally, despite measures put in place to prevent contamination, extraneous microplastics were recovered from experimental fish, highlighting the challenge to completely eliminate contamination in microplastic exposure studies. These results are critical to inform and continuously improve protocols for future microplastics research, and to elucidate patterns of microplastic contamination and associated risks in marine organisms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inclusion of higher order mesopredators (reef fish) in MP studies is less frequent, leaving a gap in understanding of mechanisms of MPs transfer to and ecological fate in higher trophic level organisms.
“The inclusion of higher order mesopredators (i.e., reef fish) in such studies is less frequent (Critchell and Hoogenboom, 2018; Santana et al., 2021), leaving a gap in our understanding of the mech anisms of MPs transfer to and their ecological fate in these higher trophic level organisms.”
From Trophic transfer of polyester microfibres across a multi-level marine food web. (2025) · cites this paper as Santana et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kulcsár, D. (2019). Microplastic Ingestion and Selectivity in Anemonefish (Amphiprion melanopus) from Field Observations (Great Barrier Reef) and Controlled Laboratory Exposures. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
- 6b00183 · DOI · Paper page
- Newman, M. C. (2012). "Bioaccumulation, " in Quantitative Ecotoxicology, ed. M. C. Newman (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 77-138.
- Schlawinsky, M. (2020). The Intake of Microplastic debris by Marine Organisms on the Great Barrier Reef. Ph. D. Thesis, Oldenburg University, Oldenburg.
- Authors
- Santana, M. F. M., Dawson, A. L., Motti, C. A., van Herwerden, L., Lefevre, C., & Kroon, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Santana, Marina F. M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3140397730
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Institute of Marine Science
- Australian Government
- James Cook University
- Queensland Government
- Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Australian Government
- Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, microplastic ingestion, depuration kinetics, Pomacentrus amboinensis, Pomacentridae, planktivorous fish, polypropylene particles, polyester fibers, body burden, microplastic concentration, coral reef fish, Great Barrier Reef
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review