Cited by 70Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationWildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Coping With Constraints: Achieving Effective Conservation With Limited Resources

Open access
Walls, Susan C.·2018·Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Conservation resources have become increasingly limited and, along with social, cultural and political complexities, this shortfall frequently challenges effectiveness in conservation. Because conservation can be costly, efforts are often only initiated after a species has declined below a critical threshold and/or when statutory protection is mandated. However, implementing conservation proactively, rather than reactively, is predicted to be less costly and to decrease a species' risk of extinction. Despite these benefits, I document that the number of studies that have implemented proactive conservation around the world are far fewer than those that simply acknowledge the need for such action. I provide examples of proactive actions that can ameliorate shortfalls in funding and other assets, thus helping conservation practitioners and managers cope with the constraints that resource limitation imposes. Not all of these options are new; however, the timing of their implementation is critical for effective conservation, and the need for more proactive conservation is increasingly recognized. These actions are (1) strengthening and diversifying stakeholder involvement in conservation projects; (2) complementing time-consuming and labor-intensive demographic studies with alternative approaches of detecting declines and estimating extinction risk; and (3) minimizing future costly conservation and management by proactively keeping common species common. These approaches may not constitute a cure-all for every conservation crisis. However, given escalating rates of species' losses, perhaps a reminder that these proactive actions can reduce conservation costs, save time, and potentially thwart population declines is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fevo.2018.00024

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All zoos worldwide face the common denominator of effective management of sustainable captive populations with often significant resource constraints.

    “the common denominator that all zoos worldwide face is the effective management of sustainable captive populations with often significant resource constraints [72].”

    From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that limited funding and other resources constrain effective conservation, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) likewise discuss conservation budget shortfalls. The paper does not establish that all zoos worldwide face these constraints or frame their shared task as managing sustainable captive populations; its discussion of captive breeding concerns particular species in crisis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walls, S. C.
Affiliations
U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Walls, Susan C.
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2018-03-16
Volume
6
ISSN
2296-701X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793023384
Cited by
70
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
conservation costs, extinction risk, population decline detection, stakeholder engagement, demographic analysis, conservation funding, species management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review