The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling Palaeoecological Time Series Using Generalised Additive Models
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In the absence of annual laminations, time series generated from lake sediments or other similar stratigraphic sequences are irregularly spaced in time, which complicates formal analysis using classical statistical time series models. In lieu, statistical analyses of trends in palaeoen-vironmental time series, if done at all, have typically used simpler linear regressions or (non-) parametric correlations with little regard for the violation of assumptions that almost surely occurs due to temporal dependencies in the data or that correlations do not provide estimates of the magnitude of change, just whether or not there is a linear or monotonic trend. Alternative approaches have used L oess -estimated trends to justify data interpretations or test hypotheses as to the causal factors without considering the inherent subjectivity of the choice of parameters used to achieve the L oess fit (e.g. span width, degree of polynomial). Generalized additive models (GAMs) are statistical models that can be used to estimate trends as smooth functions of time. Unlike L oess , GAMs use automatic smoothness selection methods to objectively determine the complexity of the fitted trend, and as formal statistical models, GAMs, allow for potentially complex, non-linear trends, a proper accounting of model uncertainty, and the identification of periods of significant temporal change. Here, I present a consistent and modern approach to the estimation of trends in palaeoenvironmental time series using GAMs, illustrating features of the methodology with two example time series of contrasting complexity; a 150-year bulk organic matter δ 15 N time series from Small Water, UK, and a 3000-year alkenone record from Braya-S ϕ , Greenland. I discuss the underlying mechanics of GAMs that allow them to learn the shape of the trend from the data themselves and how simultaneous confidence intervals and the first derivatives of the trend are used to properly account for model uncertainty and identify periods of change. It is hoped that by using GAMs greater attention is paid to the statistical estimation of trends in palaeoenvironmental time series leading to more a robust and reproducible palaeoscience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
Wood, S. N. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315370279 · Cited by 13,852
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots
Cleveland, W. S. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 · Cited by 11,594
Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 · Cited by 11,187
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Koyak, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290538 · Cited by 7,596
Wood, S. N. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x · Cited by 7,537
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Cited by
Understanding the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach to Smoothing
Miller, D. L., Glennie, R., & Seaton, A. E. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-019-00377-z · Cited by 46
Conspiracy theories on Twitter: emerging motifs and temporal dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic
Batzdorfer, V., Steinmetz, H., Biella, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00298-6 · Cited by 38
“Second, we formally tested for linear and nonlinear trends, season effects, and potential group differences by means of generalised additive models [GAMs, 12, 64, 65].”
MethodPhytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sanchez Martinez, B. A., Booij, R., Philip, A., Gosling, W. D., Bush, M. B., & McMichael, C. N. H. (2024) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-023-00932-2 · Cited by 20
Gushulak, C. A., Marshall, M., Cumming, B. F., Llew-Williams, B., Timothy Patterson, R., & McCarthy, F. M. (2022) · The Anthropocene Review · doi:10.1177/20530196211046036 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpson, G. L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-10-26
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-701X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952845386
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 15.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling Palaeoecological Time Series Using Generalised Additive Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fevo.2018.00149
- The paper
- Simpson, G. L. (2018). Modelling Palaeoecological Time Series Using Generalised Additive Models. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.