Bison Reintroduction to Mixed-Grass Prairie Is Associated With Increases in Bird Diversity and Cervid Occupancy in Riparian Areas
Open accessAbstract
In grassland ecosystems, grazing by large herbivores is a highly influential process that affects biodiversity by modifying the vegetative environment through selective consumption. Here, we test whether restoration of bison is associated with increased bird diversity and cervid occupancy in networks of riparian habitat within a temperate grassland ecosystem, mixed-grass prairie in northcentral Montana, United States. We used a long time-series of remote sensing imagery to examine changes in riparian vegetation structure in stream networks within bison and cattle pastures. We then assessed how vegetation structure influenced diversity of bird communities and detection rates of mammals in these same riparian networks. We found that percent cover of woody vegetation, and native grasses and forbs increased more rapidly over time in bison pastures, and that these changes in vegetation structure were associated with increased bird diversity and cervid occupancy. In conclusion, bison reintroduction appears to function as a passive riparian restoration strategy with positive diversity outcomes for birds and mammals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bison has been called an ecosystem engineer and a keystone species because of its role in shaping plant communities and interactions with other animal species.
“The American bison (Bison bison), or American buffalo, has been called an ecosystem engineer and a keystone species because of the role of bison in shaping plant communities, and their interactions with other animal species (Boyce et al., 2022; Geremia et al., 2019; Gerlanc & Kaufman, 2003; Joern, 2005; Knapp et al., 1999; Krueger, 1986).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Boyce et al., 2022
The Discussion calls bison a “keystone grazer,” and the Abstract reports vegetation changes associated with increased bird diversity and cervid occupancy. Our copy does not itself call bison an “ecosystem engineer”; that term appears in the title of another work in its References. The ecological role is supported, but the full characterization is not. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bison Versus Cattle: Are They Ecologically Synonymous?
Kohl, M. T., Krausman, P. R., Kunkel, K., & Williams, D. M. (2013) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/rem-d-12-00113.1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Shamon, H., Cosby, O. G., Andersen, C. L., Augare, H., BearCub Stiffarm, J., Bresnan, C. E., Brock, B. L., Carlson, E., Deichmann, J. L., Epps, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.826282 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMcMillan, N. A., Kunkel, K. E., Hagan, D. L., & Jachowski, D. S. (2019) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12856 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Grassland bird diversity and abundance in the presence of native and non-native grazers
Boyce, A. J., Shamon, H., Kunkel, K. E., & McShea, W. J. (2021) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-01944-160213 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationFreese, C. H., Fuhlendorf, S. D., & Kunkel, K. (2014) · Ecological Restoration · doi:10.3368/er.32.4.358 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings
Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10369 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boyce, A. J., Shamon, H., & McShea, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boyce, Andy J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-03-18
- Volume
- 10
- ISSN
- 2296-701X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220731941
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- bison reintroduction, mixed-grass prairie, bird diversity, riparian zones, grassland restoration, riparian vegetation structure, woody vegetation cover, cattle pastures, temperate grassland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review