Cited by 71Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Bison Versus Cattle: Are They Ecologically Synonymous?

Open access
Kohl, Michel T., Krausman, Paul R., Kunkel, Kyran, Williams, David M.·2013·Rangeland Ecology & Management

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2111/rem-d-12-00113.1

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ecological effects of prehistoric bison on the western plains were diffused over large areas by seasonal migrations, a fact that can make modern localized bison herds different from the free‐ranging bison of the past.

    “In contrast, the ecological effects of prehistoric bison on the western plains were diffused over large areas by seasonal migrations (McHugh, 1972), a fact that can make modern localized bison herds, confined by physical or political boundaries, different from the free‐ranging bison of the past (Kohl et al., 2013; Wuerthner, 1998).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Kohl et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohl, M. T., Krausman, P. R., Kunkel, K., & Williams, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Montana (US)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kohl, Michel T.
Venue
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
721-731
ISSN
1550-7424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139907701
Cited by
69
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rangeland Ecology & Management (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (submittedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1101342)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • University of Montana
  • Parks Canada
  • U.S. Bureau of Land Management
  • Montana Institute on Ecosystems
  • Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPS-1101342)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
plains bison, bison, cattle, grazing behavior, landscape use, prairie restoration, resource selection, water consumption, movement frequency, habitat selection, Great Plains, Grasslands National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review