Cited by 162Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review

Open access

Morota, Gota, Gianola, Daniel·2014·Frontiers in Genetics

DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00363PMC PMC4199321

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Prediction of genetic values has been a focus of applied quantitative genetics since the beginning of the 20th century, with renewed interest following the advent of the era of whole genome-enabled prediction. Opportunities offered by the emergence of high-dimensional genomic data fueled by post-Sanger sequencing technologies, especially molecular markers, have driven researchers to extend Ronald Fisher and Sewall Wright's models to confront new challenges. In particular, kernel methods are gaining consideration as a regression method of choice for genome-enabled prediction. Complex traits are presumably influenced by many genomic regions working in concert with others (clearly so when considering pathways), thus generating interactions. Motivated by this view, a growing number of statistical approaches based on kernels attempt to capture non-additive effects, either parametrically or non-parametrically. This review centers on whole-genome regression using kernel methods applied to a wide range of quantitative traits of agricultural importance in animals and plants. We discuss various kernel-based approaches tailored to capturing total genetic variation, with the aim of arriving at an enhanced predictive performance in the light of available genome annotation information. Connections between prediction machines born in animal breeding, statistics, and machine learning are revisited, and their empirical prediction performance is discussed. Overall, while some encouraging results have been obtained with non-parametric kernels, recovering non-additive genetic variation in a validation dataset remains a challenge in quantitative genetics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2014.00363

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

1 retracted

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection and replication of epistasis influencing transcription in humans
Hemani, G., Shakhbazov, K., Westra, H.-J., Esko, T., Henders, A. K., McRae, A. F., Yang, J., Gibson, G. C., Martin, N. G., Metspalu, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13005 · Cited by 186
Retracted
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics
Bilonick, R. A. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484886 · Cited by 4,447
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.
Fisher, R. A. (1919) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0080456800012163 · Cited by 4,387
ANew Look at the Statistical Model Identification
AKAlKE, H. (2011) · Cited by 4,177

Show all 119 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Harville, 1983, Discussion on A Section on Interpolation and Estimation. in Statistics an Appraisal

Sorted by citations

Enhancing Genetic Gain through Genomic Selection: From Livestock to Plants
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Fu, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Huang, C., Prasanna, B. M., Olsen, M. S., Wang, G., & Zhang, A. (2019) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005 · Cited by 318
Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection
Jiang, Y., & Reif, J. C. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177907 · Cited by 271
BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND PRECISION ANIMAL AGRICULTURE SYMPOSIUM: Machine learning and data mining advance predictive big data analysis in precision animal agriculture1
Morota, G., Ventura, R. V., Silva, F. F. E., Koyama, M., & Fernando, S. C. (2018) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/sky014 · Cited by 245
Self-citation
Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection
Varona, L., Legarra, A., Toro, M. Á., & Vitezica, Z. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00078 · Cited by 242
Genomic and environmental determinants and their interplay underlying phenotypic plasticity
Li, X., Guo, T., Mu, Q., Li, X., & Yu, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718326115 · Cited by 256
Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks
Yu, X., Li, X., Guo, T., Zhu, C., Wu, Y., Mitchell, S. E., Roozeboom, K. L., Wang, D., Wang, M. L., PEDERSON, G. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.150 · Cited by 239
Metabolomic selection for enhanced fruit flavor
Colantonio, V., Ferrão, L. F. V., Tieman, D. M., Bliznyuk, N., Sims, C. A., Klee, H. J., Muńoz, P., & Resende, M. F. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115865119 · Cited by 219
Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models
Cuevas, J., Crossa, J., Soberanis, V., Pérez‐Elizalde, S., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Campos, G. D. L., Montesinos‐López, O. A., & Burgueño, J. (2016) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.03.0024 · Cited by 181
Nonlinear kernels, dominance, and envirotyping data increase the accuracy of genome-based prediction in multi-environment trials
Costa-Neto, G., Fritsche-Neto, R., & Crossa, J. (2021) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-020-00353-1 · Cited by 153
Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction in citrus: Potential of genomics-assisted breeding for fruit quality traits
Minamikawa, M. F., Nonaka, K., Kaminuma, E., Kajiya‐Kanegae, H., Onogi, A., Goto, S., Yoshioka, T., Imai, A., Hamada, H., Hayashi, T., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05100-x · Cited by 160
Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population
He, S., Schulthess, A. W., Mirdita, V., Zhao, Y., Korzun, V. N., Bothe, R., Ebmeyer, E., Reif, J. C., & Jiang, Y. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-015-2655-1 · Cited by 166
Prospects for Genomic Selection in Cassava Breeding
Wolfe, M. D., Carpio, D. P. D., Alabi, O., Ezenwaka, L., Ikeogu, U. N., Kayondo, S. I., Lozano, R. D., Okeke, U. G., Ozimati, A., Esuma, W., et al. (2017) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2017.03.0015 · Cited by 147
The Current and Future Use of Ridge Regression for Prediction in Quantitative Genetics
de Vlaming, R., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/143712 · Cited by 117
Deep Kernel for Genomic and Near Infrared Predictions in Multi-environment Breeding Trials
Cuevas, J., Montesinos-López, O., Juliana, P., Guzmán, C., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., González-Bucio, J., Burgueño, J., Montesinos-López, A., & Crossa, J. (2019) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.119.400493 · Cited by 97
Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction
Sousa, M. B. E., Cuevas, J., Couto, E. G. D. O., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Jarquín, D., Fritsche‐Neto, R., Burgueño, J. A., & Crossa, J. L. (2017) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.042341 · Cited by 109
Comparing estimates of genetic variance across different relationship models
Legarra, A. (2015) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.005 · Cited by 97
Predicting Growth and Carcass Traits in Swine Using Microbiome Data and Machine Learning Algorithms
Maltecca, C., Lu, D., Schillebeeckx, C., McNulty, N. P., Schwab, C. R., Shull, C. M., & Tiezzi, F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43031-x · Cited by 94
Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops
Guo, T., Yu, X., Li, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Flint-Garcia, S. A., McMullen, M. D., Holland, J. B., Szalma, S. J., Wisser, R. J., et al. (2019) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.022 · Cited by 89
A review of machine learning models applied to genomic prediction in animal breeding
Chafai, N., Hayah, I., Houaga, I., & Badaoui, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1150596 · Cited by 101
Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction for CBSD resistance in Manihot esculenta
Kayondo, S. I., Carpio, D. P. D., Lozano, R. D., Ozimati, A., Wolfe, M. D., Baguma, Y., Gracen, V., Offei, S. K., Ferguson, M. E., Kawuki, R., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19696-1 · Cited by 87
Potential and limits of whole genome prediction of resistance to Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in a vast Central European elite winter wheat population
Mirdita, V., He, S., Zhao, Y., Korzun, V. N., Bothe, R., Ebmeyer, E., Reif, J. C., & Jiang, Y. (2015) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-015-2602-1 · Cited by 88
Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship
Martini, J. W. R., Wimmer, V., Erbe, M., & Simianer, H. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2675-5 · Cited by 82
Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials
Crossa, J., Martini, J. W. R., Gianola, D., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Jarquin, D., Juliana, P., Montesinos-López, O., & Cuevas, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01168 · Cited by 79
Prediction of Plant Height in Arabidopsis thaliana Using DNA Methylation Data
Hu, Y., Morota, G., Rosa, G. J. M., & Gianola, D. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177204 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
On the Use of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient for Model Evaluation in Genome-Wide Prediction
Waldmann, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00899 · Cited by 74
Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs
Jonas, E., & de Koning, D. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00049 · Cited by 79
Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action
Momen, M. M., Mehrgardi, A. A., Sheikhi, A., Kranis, A., Tusell, L., Morota, G., Rosa, G. J. M., & Gianola, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30089-2 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Multi-trait genomic prediction for nitrogen response indices in tropical maize hybrids
Lyra, D. H., Mendonça, L. D. F., Galli, G., Alves, F. C., Granato, Í. S. C., & Fritsche‐Neto, R. (2017) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-017-0681-1 · Cited by 66
Predicting bull fertility using genomic data and biological information
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R., Morota, G., & Peñagaricano, F. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13288 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Machine learning for predicting phenotype from genotype and environment
Guo, T., & Li, X. (2023) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102853 · Cited by 61
Predicting male fertility in dairy cattle using markers with large effect and functional annotation data
Nani, J. P., de Rezende, F. M., & Peñagaricano, F. (2019) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-5644-y · Cited by 63
Applications of Support Vector Machine in Genomic Prediction in Pig and Maize Populations
Zhao, W., Lai, X., Liu, D., Zhang, Z., Ma, P., Wang, Q., Zhang, Z., & Pan, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.598318 · Cited by 64
Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees
Waldmann, P. (2016) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0219-8 · Cited by 59
Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods
de Andrade, L. R. B., Sousa, M. B. E., de Oliveira, E. J., de Resende, M. D. V., & Azevedo, C. F. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224920 · Cited by 56
Evidence for the placenta-brain axis: multi-omic kernel aggregation predicts intellectual and social impairment in children born extremely preterm
Junior, H. P. D. O. S., Bhattacharya, A., Joseph, R. M., Smeester, L., Kuban, K., Marsit, C. J., O’Shea, T. M., & Fry, R. C. (2020) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-020-00402-w · Cited by 52
Selection of the Bandwidth Parameter in a Bayesian Kernel Regression Model for Genomic-Enabled Prediction
Pérez‐Elizalde, S., Cuevas, J., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., & Crossa, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-015-0229-y · Cited by 51
Multikernel linear mixed models for complex phenotype predictionPreprint
Weissbrod, O., Geiger, D., & Rosset, S. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.201996.115 · Cited by 46
Deep neural networks for genomic prediction do not estimate marker effects
Ubbens, J. R., Parkin, I. A. P., Eynck, C., Stavness, I., & Sharpe, A. (2021) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20147 · Cited by 46
Interdisciplinary strategies to enable data-driven plant breeding in a changing climate
Kusmec, A., Zheng, Z., Archontoulis, S. V., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Hu, G., Wang, L., Yu, J., & Schnable, P. S. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.005 · Cited by 47
Leveraging Breeding Values Obtained from Random Regression Models for Genetic Inference of Longitudinal Traits
Campbell, M. T., Momen, M. M., Walia, H., & Morota, G. (2019) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2018.10.0075 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome
Karaman, E., Lund, M. S., Anche, M. T., Janss, L., & Su, G. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.118.200673 · Cited by 45
Genomic Selection in Rubber Tree Breeding: A Comparison of Models and Methods for Managing G×E Interactions
Souza, L. M., Francisco, F. R., Gonçalves, P. S., Scaloppi, E. J., Guen, V. L., Fritsche‐Neto, R., & de Souza, A. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01353 · Cited by 42
Modeling host-microbiome interactions for the prediction of meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine
Khanal, P., Maltecca, C., Schwab, C. R., Fix, J., Bergamaschi, M., & Tiezzi, F. (2020) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-020-00561-7 · Cited by 48
Genomic prediction for yields, processing and nutritional quality traits in cultivated potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)
Habyarimana, E., Parisi, B., & Mandolino, G. (2017) · Plant Breeding · doi:10.1111/pbr.12461 · Cited by 44
Implementation of Genomic Selection in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program, Findings from the Past 10 Years
Dreisigacker, S., Crossa, J. L., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Montesinos-López, O. A., Rosyara, U. R., Juliana, P., Mondal, S., Crespo‐Herrera, L., Govindan, V., Singh, R. P., et al. (2021) · Crop Breeding Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.20900/cbgg20210005 · Cited by 44
Genetic Dissection of Grain Yield of Maize and Yield-Related Traits Through Association Mapping and Genomic Prediction
Ma, J., & Cao, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.690059 · Cited by 38
A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits
Daniel Gianola, B., & Fernando, R. L. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302934 · Cited by 36
Response to Early Generation Genomic Selection for Yield in Wheat
Bonnett, D. G., Li, Y., Crossa, J. L., Dreisigacker, S., Basnet, B. R., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Alvarado, G., Jannink, J., Poland, J., & Sorrells, M. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.718611 · Cited by 39
A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers
Momen, M. M., Mehrgardi, A. A., Sheikhy, A., Esmailizadeh, A., Fozi, M. A., Kranis, A., Valente, B. D., Rosa, G. J. M., & Gianola, D. (2017) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0290-9 · Cited by 41
Bayesian optimization for genomic selection: a method for discovering the best genotype among a large number of candidates
Tanaka, R., & Iwata, H. (2017) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-017-2988-z · Cited by 38
Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R., Morota, G., Valente, B. D., Kranis, A., Rosa, G. J. M., & Gianola, D. (2016) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0187-z · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Phantom Epistasis in Genomic Selection: On the Predictive Ability of Epistatic Models
Schrauf, M. F., Martini, J. W. R., Simianer, H., Campos, G. D. L., Cantet, R. J. C., Freudenthal, J. A., Korte, A., & Munilla, S. (2020) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401300 · Cited by 36
The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics
McGaugh, S. E., Lorenz, A. J., & Flagel, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0693 · Cited by 35
Assessing combining abilities, genomic data, and genotype × environment interactions to predict hybrid grain sorghum performance
Fonseca, J. M. O., Klein, P. E., Crossa, J. L., Pacheco, Á., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Perumal, R., Klein, R. R., & Rooney, W. L. (2021) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20127 · Cited by 39
Genome-wide analysis of acute low salinity tolerance in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and potential of genomic selection for trait improvement
McCarty, A. J., Allen, S. K., & Plough, L. V. (2021) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab368 · Cited by 38
Gene mapping and genomic prediction of bull fertility using sex chromosome markers
Pacheco, H. A., de Rezende, F. M., & Peñagaricano, F. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17767 · Cited by 34
Genomic prediction of bull fertility in US Jersey dairy cattle
de Rezende, F. M., Nani, J. P., & Peñagaricano, F. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15810 · Cited by 35
Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees
Filho, J. E. D. A., Guimarães, J. F. R., Silva, F. F. E., de Resende, M. D. V., Muńoz, P., Kirst, M., & Resende, M. F. R. (2019) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.119.201004 · Cited by 32
Incorporating Genome Annotation Into Genomic Prediction for Carcass Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle
Xu, L., Gao, N., Wang, Z., Xu, L., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, L., Gao, X., Zhang, L., Gao, H., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00481 · Cited by 31
Heritable and Nonheritable Rumen Bacteria Are Associated with Different Characters of Lactation Performance of Dairy Cows
Zang, X., Sun, H., Xue, M., Zhang, Z., Plastow, G. S., Yang, T., Guan, L. L., & Liu, J. (2022) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00422-22 · Cited by 37
Epistasis Detection and Modeling for Genomic Selection in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)
Olatoye, M. O., Hu, Z., & Aikpokpodion, P. O. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00677 · Cited by 29
Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction of yield-related traits and starch pasting properties in cassava
Phumichai, C., Aiemnaka, P., Nathaisong, P., Hunsawattanakul, S., Fungfoo, P., Rojanaridpiched, C., Vichukit, V., Kongsil, P., Kittipadakul, P., Wannarat, W., et al. (2021) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-021-03956-2 · Cited by 31
High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis with Applications to Causal Gene Identification
Zhang, Q. (2021) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-021-09328-0 · Cited by 28
An experimental approach for estimating the genomic selection advantage for Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in winter wheat
Herter, C. P., Ebmeyer, E., Kollers, S., Korzun, V. N., & Miedaner, T. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03364-7 · Cited by 30
Global genotype by environment prediction competition reveals that diverse modeling strategies can deliver satisfactory maize yield estimates
Washburn, J. D., Varela, J. I., Xavier, A., Chen, Q., Ertl, D., Gage, J. L., Holland, J. B., Lima, D. C., Romay, M. C., Lopez-Cruz, M. A., et al. (2024) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyae195 · Cited by 34
Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine
Cappa, E. P., Chen, C., Klutsch, J. G., Sebastian‐Azcona, J., Ratcliffe, B., Wei, X., Ros, L. M. D., Ullah, A., Liu, Y., Benowicz, A., et al. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7 · Cited by 30
A spectrum of explainable and interpretable machine learning approaches for genomic studies
Conard, A. M., DenAdel, A., & Crawford, L. A. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1617 · Cited by 35
Performance of whole genome prediction for growth traits in a crossbred chicken population
Teng, J., Gao, N., Zhang, H., Li, X., Li, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps/pey604 · Cited by 28
Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans
Xavier, A., Muir, W. M., & Rainey, K. M. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0899-7 · Cited by 27
Effectiveness of genomic selection for improving provitamin A carotenoid content and associated traits in cassava
Esuma, W., Ozimati, A., Kulakow, P., Gore, M. A., Wolfe, M. D., Nuwamanya, E., Egesi, C. N., & Kawuki, R. (2021) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab160 · Cited by 25
Genome-Based Genotype × Environment Prediction Enhances Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Improvement Using Pseudo-Diploid and Polysomic Tetraploid Modeling
Ortiz, R. O., Crossa, J. L., Reslow, F., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., & Cuevas, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.785196 · Cited by 24
Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review
Seyum, E. G., Bille, N. H., Abtew, W. G., Munyengwa, N., Bell, J. M., & Cros, D. (2022) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-022-01326-4 · Cited by 27
A Unified and Comprehensible View of Parametric and Kernel Methods for Genomic Prediction with Application to Rice
Jacquin, L. J., Cao, T., & Ahmadi, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00145 · Cited by 26
Multi-task Gaussian process for imputing missing data in multi-trait and multi-environment trials
Hori, T., Montcho, D., Agbangla, C., Ebana, K., Futakuchi, K., & Iwata, H. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2760-9 · Cited by 22
Transcriptome‐wide association and prediction for carotenoids and tocochromanols in fresh sweet corn kernels
Hershberger, J. L., Tanaka, R., Wood, J. C., Kaczmar, N. S., Wu, D., Hamilton, J. P., DellaPenna, D., Buell, C. R., & Gore, M. A. (2022) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20197 · Cited by 23
Integrating genomic and infrared spectral data improves the prediction of milk protein composition in dairy cattle
Baba, T., Pegolo, S., Mota, L. F. M., Peñagaricano, F., Bittante, G., Cecchinato, A., & Morota, G. (2021) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-021-00620-7 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
lme4GS: An R-Package for Genomic Selection
Caamal-Pat, D., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Crossa, J. L., Velasco‐Cruz, C., Pérez‐Elizalde, S., & Peña, M. A. V. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.680569 · Cited by 22
Gene × gene and genotype × environment interactions in wheat
Raffo, M. A., & Jensen, J. (2023) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20986 · Cited by 22
Quantifying genomic connectedness and prediction accuracy from additive and non-additive gene actions
Momen, M. M., & Morota, G. (2018) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-018-0415-9 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning
Reinoso-Peláez, E. L., Gianola, D., & González-Recio, Ó. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_7 · Cited by 21
Genomic Prediction of Grain Yield in a Barley MAGIC Population Modeling Genotype per Environment Interaction
Puglisi, D., Delbono, S., Visioni, A., Özkan, H., İbrahim, K. A. R. A., Casas, A. M., Igartua, E., Valè, G., Piero, A. R. L., Cattivelli, L., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.664148 · Cited by 17
Multi-generation genomic prediction of maize yield using parametric and non-parametric sparse selection indices
Lopez-Cruz, M. A., Beyene, Y., Gowda, M., Crossa, J. L., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., & Campos, G. D. L. (2021) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-021-00474-1 · Cited by 21
Genomic prediction with machine learning in sugarcane, a complex highly polyploid clonally propagated crop with substantial non‐additive variation for key traits
Chen, C., Powell, O. M., Dinglasan, E. G., Ross, E. M., Yadav, S., Wei, X., Atkin, F., Deomano, E. C., & Hayes, B. J. (2023) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20390 · Cited by 18
Joint Use of Genome, Pedigree, and Their Interaction with Environment for Predicting the Performance of Wheat Lines in New Environments
Howard, R., Daniel Gianola, B., Montesinos-López, O., Juliana, P., Singh, R. P., Poland, J., Shrestha, S. K., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Crossa, J. L., & Jarquín, D. (2019) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.119.400508 · Cited by 16
Accuracy of whole genome prediction with single-step GBLUP in a Chinese yellow-feathered chicken population
Gao, N., Teng, J., Pan, R., Li, X., Ye, S., Li, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103817 · Cited by 16
Innovative Approaches in the Breeding of Climate‐Resilient Crops
Cvejić, S., Jocić, S., Mitrović, B., Bekavac, G., Mirosavljević, M., Marjanović‐Jeromela, A., Zorić, M., Radanović, A., Kondić‐Špika, A., & Miladinović, D. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119789789.ch6 · Cited by 16
Adjusting for Spatial Effects in Genomic Prediction
Mao, X., Dutta, S., Wong, R. K. W., & Nettleton, D. S. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-020-00396-1 · Cited by 17
An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations
Heslot, N., & Jannink, J. (2015) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0171-z · Cited by 14
Do stronger measures of genomic connectedness enhance prediction accuracies across management units?1
Yu, H., Spangler, M. L., Lewis, R. M., & Morota, G. (2018) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/sky316 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Utilizing genomic prediction to boost hybrid performance in a sweet corn breeding program
Peixoto, M. A., Leach, K. A., Jarquín, D., Flannery, P., Zystro, J., Tracy, W. F., Bhering, L. L., & Resende, M. F. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1293307 · Cited by 16
Toward Capturing Genetic Epistasis from Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Studies Using Mixed-Precision Kernel Ridge Regression
Ltaief, H., Alomairy, R., Cao, Q., Ren, J., Slim, L., Kurth, T., Dorschner, B., Bougouffa, S., Abdelkhalak, R., & Keyes, D. E. (2024) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) · doi:10.1109/sc41406.2024.00012 · Cited by 19
Robust modeling of additive and nonadditive variation with intuitive inclusion of expert knowledge
Hem, I. G., Selle, M. L., Gorjanc, G., Fuglstad, G., & Riebler, A. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab002 · Cited by 10
Statistical and Computational Challenges in Whole Genome Prediction and Genome-Wide Association Analyses for Plant and Animal Breeding
Tempelman, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-015-0225-2 · Cited by 13
Evaluation of Nonparametric Models for Genomic Prediction of Early‐Stage Single Crosses in Maize
Kadam, D. C., & Lorenz, A. J. (2019) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2017.11.0668 · Cited by 14
Genomic selection for agronomic traits in a winter wheat breeding program
Ficht, A., Konkin, D. J. F., Cram, D., Sidebottom, C. H. D., Tan, Y., Pozniak, C. J., & Rajcan, I. (2023) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-023-04294-1 · Cited by 12
A liquid biomarker signature of inflammatory proteins accurately predicts early pancreatic cancer progression during FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy
van Eijck, C. W. F., Sabroso‐Lasa, S., Strijk, G. J., Mustafa, D. A. M., Fellah, A., Koerkamp, B. G., Malats, N., & van Eijck, C. H. J. (2024) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2024.100975 · Cited by 12
A first characterization of the microbiota-resilience link in swine
Mancin, E., Maltecca, C., Huang, Y., Mantovani, R., & Tiezzi, F. (2024) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-024-01771-7 · Cited by 11
Prediction of biological age and evaluation of genome-wide dynamic methylomic changes throughout human aging
Roudbar, M. A., Mousavi, S. F., Ardestani, S. S., Lopes, F. B., Momen, M. M., Gianola, D., & Khatib, H. (2021) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab112 · Cited by 18
Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for iron and zinc concentration and iron bioavailability in a collection of yellow dry beans
Izquierdo, P., Sadohara, R., Wiesinger, J. A., Glahn, R. P., Urrea, C. A., & Cichy, K. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1330361 · Cited by 10
Lost in Translation: On the Problem of Data Coding in Penalized Whole Genome Regression with Interactions
Martini, J. W. R., Rosales, F., Ha, N.-T., Heise, J., Wimmer, V., & Kneib, T. (2019) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.118.200961 · Cited by 10

Authors: Morota, G., & Gianola, D.
Affiliations: University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author: Morota, Gota
ORCID: Morota, Gota
Venue: Frontiers in Genetics
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Published: 2014-10-16
Volume: 5
Pages: 363-363
ISSN: 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00363
PMC: PMC4199321
OpenAlex: W2061187129
Cited by: 162
References: 119
Citations by year: 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10
FWCI: 1.41
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords: kernel methods, whole-genome prediction, complex traits, non-additive genetic effects, epistasis, quantitative genetics, animal breeding, plant breeding, molecular markers, genome annotation, predictive performance, high-dimensional genomic data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks