Neural Networks for Classification and Image Generation of Aging in Genetic Syndromes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: In medical genetics, one application of neural networks is the diagnosis of genetic diseases based on images of patient faces. While these applications have been validated in the literature with primarily pediatric subjects, it is not known whether these applications can accurately diagnose patients across a lifespan. We aimed to extend previous works to determine whether age plays a factor in facial diagnosis as well as to explore other factors that may contribute to the overall diagnostic accuracy. Methods: To investigate this, we chose two relatively common conditions, Williams syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We built a neural network classifier trained on images of affected and unaffected individuals of different ages and compared classifier accuracy to clinical geneticists. We analyzed the results of saliency maps and the use of generative adversarial networks to boost accuracy. Results: Our classifier outperformed clinical geneticists at recognizing face images of these two conditions within each of the age groups (the performance varied between the age groups): 1) under 2 years old, 2) 2–9 years old, 3) 10–19 years old, 4) 20–34 years old, and 5) ≥35 years old. The overall accuracy improvement by our classifier over the clinical geneticists was 15.5 and 22.7% for Williams syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, respectively. Additionally, comparison of saliency maps revealed that key facial features learned by the neural network differed with respect to age. Finally, joint training real images with multiple different types of fake images created by a generative adversarial network showed up to 3.25% accuracy gain in classification accuracy. Conclusion: The ability of clinical geneticists to diagnose these conditions is influenced by the age of the patient. Deep learning technologies such as our classifier can more accurately identify patients across the lifespan based on facial features. Saliency maps of computer vision reveal that the syndromic facial feature attributes change with the age of the patient. Modest improvements in the classifier accuracy were observed when joint training was carried out with both real and fake images. Our findings highlight the need for a greater focus on age as a confounder in facial diagnosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Clark, M. M., Hildreth, A., Batalov, S., Ding, Y., Chowdhury, S., Watkins, K., Ellsworth, K., Camp, B., Kint, C. I., Yacoubian, C., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat6177 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Benchmarking saliency methods for chest X-ray interpretation
Saporta, A., Gui, X., Agrawal, A., Pareek, A., Truong, S. Q. H., Nguyen, C. D. T., Ngo, V.-D., Seekins, J., Blankenberg, F. G., Ng, A. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00536-x · Cited by 270 · see citing works
GestaltMatcher facilitates rare disease matching using facial phenotype descriptors
Hsieh, T.-C., Bar-Haim, A., Moosa, S., Ehmke, N., Gripp, K. W., Pantel, J. T., Danyel, M., Mensah, M. A., Horn, D., Rosnev, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-01010-x · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few shot learning for phenotype-driven diagnosis of patients with rare genetic diseases
Alsentzer, E., Li, M. M., Kobren, S. N., Noori, A., Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Kohane, I. S., & Zitnik, M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01749-1 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Duong, D., Hu, P., Tekendo-Ngongang, C., Hanchard, S. E. L., Liu, S., Solomon, B. D., & Waikel, R. L.
- Affiliations
- National Human Genome Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solomon, Benjamin D.
- Waikel, Rebekah L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Genetics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-04-11
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 864092-864092
- ISSN
- 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9035665
- OpenAlex
- W4226350219
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
- Keywords
- Williams syndrome, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, facial diagnosis, genetic syndromes, age as confounder, deep learning classification, saliency maps, generative adversarial networks, image-to-image translation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review