Cited by 12Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

ChestBioX-Gen: contextual biomedical report generation from chest x-ray images using BioGPT and co-attention mechanism

Open access
Ouis, Mohammed Yasser, Akhloufi, Moulay A.·2024·Frontiers in Imaging

Abstract

Efficient and accurate radiology reporting is critical in modern healthcare for timely diagnosis and patient care. In this paper, we present a novel deep learning approach that leverages BioGPT and co-attention mechanisms for automatic chest X-ray report generation. Our model, termed “ChestBioX-Gen” is designed to bridge the gap between medical images and textual reports. BioGPT, a biological language model, contributes its contextual understanding to the task, while the co-attention mechanism efficiently aligns relevant regions of the image with textual descriptions. This collaborative combination enables ChestBioX-Gen to generate coherent and contextually accurate reports that embed complex medical findings. Our model not only reduces the burden on radiologists but also enhances the consistency and quality of reports. By automating the report generation process, ChestBioX-Gen contributes to faster diagnoses and improved patient care. Quantitative evaluations, measured through BLEU-N and Rouge-L metrics, demonstrate the model's proficiency in producing clinically relevant reports with scores of 0.6685, 0.6247, 0.5689, 0.4806, and 0.7742 on BLUE 1, 2, 3, 4, and Rouge-L, respectively. In conclusion, the integration of BioGPT and co-attention mechanisms in ChestBioX-Gen represents an advancement in AI-driven medical image analysis. As radiology reporting plays a critical role in healthcare, our model holds the potential to revolutionize how medical insights are extracted and communicated, ultimately benefiting both radiologists and patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimag.2024.1373420

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The growing gap between imaging demand and radiologist availability has intensified the challenge of radiology reporting, leading to delayed diagnoses and increased workloads across healthcare systems worldwide.

    “The growing gap between imaging demand and radiologist availability has intensified this challenge, leading to delayed diagnoses and increased workloads across healthcare systems worldwide (1, 2).”

    From Swin-Qwen3: a three-stage vision–language framework for automated radiology report generation with multi-agent verification (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says timely radiology reporting matters for diagnosis and describes reducing radiologists’ burden and enabling faster diagnoses. It does not say that imaging demand is outpacing radiologist availability or that this gap has caused delayed diagnoses and increased workloads worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Liu, G., Hsu, T.-M. H., McDermott, M., Boag, W., Weng, W.-H., Szolovits, P., et al. (2019). "Clinically accurate chest X-ray report generation," in Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference (Beijing: PMLR), 249-269.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouis, M. Y., & Akhloufi, M. A.
Affiliations
Université de Moncton (CA)
Corresponding author
Akhloufi, Moulay A.
Venue
Frontiers in Imaging
Published
2024-04-19
Volume
3
ISSN
2813-3315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394961497
Cited by
12
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation de la recherche en santé du Nouveau-Brunswick
  • New Brunswick Innovation Foundation (POF2021-006)
  • Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
chest X-ray report generation, BioGPT, co-attention, image-text alignment, medical report generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review