Cited by 9Malaria Research and ControlBird parasitology and diseasesParasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Rethinking detection of pre-existing and intervening Plasmodium infections in malaria clinical trials

Open access
Owalla, Tonny J., Hergott, Dianna E. B., Seilie, Annette M., Staubus, Weston, Chavtur, Chris, Chang, Ming, Kublin, James G., Egwang, Thomas G. +1 more·2022·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Pre-existing and intervening low-density Plasmodium infections complicate the conduct of malaria clinical trials. These infections confound infection detection endpoints, and their immunological effects may detract from intended vaccine-induced immune responses. Historically, these infections were often unrecognized since infrequent and often analytically insensitive parasitological testing was performed before and during trials. Molecular diagnostics now permits their detection, but investigators must weigh the cost, complexity, and personnel demands on the study and the laboratory when scheduling such tests. This paper discusses the effect of pre-existing and intervening, low-density Plasmodium infections on malaria vaccine trial endpoints and the current methods employed for their infection detection. We review detection techniques, that until recently, provided a dearth of cost-effective strategies for detecting low density infections. A recently deployed, field-tested, simple, and cost-effective molecular diagnostic strategy for detecting pre-existing and intervening Plasmodium infections from dried blood spots (DBS) in malaria-endemic settings is discussed to inform new clinical trial designs. Strategies that combine sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques with convenient DBS collections and cost-effective pooling strategies may enable more thorough and informative infection monitoring in upcoming malaria clinical trials and epidemiological studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1003452

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of congenital malaria in India may be due to effective control measures or underreporting associated with diagnostic limitations.

    “while the absence of congenital malaria in India may be due to effective control measures or underreporting associated with diagnostic limitations [191–193].”

    From Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [192]

    The section on low-density Plasmodium infections (page unavailable) says infections can go undetected when testing is insufficiently sensitive, supporting the general concern about diagnostic limitations. It does not address congenital malaria in India, its reported absence, or effective control measures as an explanation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High prevalence rates of malaria occur in regions such as Niger and Sudan.

    “High prevalence rates in regions such as Niger and Sudan underscore.the need for improved maternal screening and preventive measures”

    From Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [192]

    The section “Low density Plasmodium infections – a frequent complicating factor worldwide” reports frequent infections in Uganda and Mozambique, supporting the general point that malaria infections can be common in endemic settings. It does not report prevalence in Niger or Sudan, the regions named in the claim, and its figures concern low-density infections rather than overall malaria prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2nd ed Vol. 9.. Geneva: WHO Press (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owalla, T. J., Hergott, D. E. B., Seilie, A. M., Staubus, W., Chavtur, C., Chang, M., Kublin, J. G., Egwang, T. G., & Murphy, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Sean C.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2022-09-20
Volume
13
Pages
1003452-1003452
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296401014
Cited by
9
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI146763)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Keywords
infection detection, dried blood spots, molecular diagnosis, malaria-endemic settings, infection monitoring
MeSH terms
Humans, Malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Malaria Vaccines, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review