The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactobacillus spp. for Gastrointestinal Health: Current and Future Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
In recent decades, probiotic bacteria have become increasingly popular as a result of mounting scientific evidence to indicate their beneficial role in modulating human health. Although there is strong evidence associating various Lactobacillus probiotics to various health benefits, further research is needed, in particular to determine the various mechanisms by which probiotics may exert these effects and indeed to gauge inter-individual value one can expect from consuming these products. One must take into consideration the differences in individual and combination strains, and conditions which create difficulty in making direct comparisons. The aim of this paper is to review the current understanding of the means by which Lactobacillus species stand to benefit our gastrointestinal health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To exert these beneficial effects, they must withstand the harsh conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, including gastric acidity and bile salts [1].”
From Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity in the Food-Derived Strain Levilactobacillus brevis M3R3: Genomic and Functional Characterization (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hill (2014) · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 · Cited by 9,592
Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hooi, J. K. Y., Lai, W. Y., Ng, W. K., Suen, M. M. Y., Underwood, F. E., Tanyingoh, D., Malfertheiner, P., Graham, D. Y., Wong, V. W., Wu, J. C., et al. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022 · Cited by 3,391
Zheng, J., Wittouck, S., Salvetti, E., Franz, C. M. A. P., Harris, H. M. B., Mattarelli, P., O’Toole, P. W., Pot, B., Vandamme, P., Walter, J., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 · Cited by 3,313
Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria
Jack, R. W., Tagg, J. R., & Ray, B. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.2.171-200.1995 · Cited by 2,711
Salminen, S., Collado, M. C., Endo, A., Hill, C., Lebeer, S., Quigley, E. M. M., Sanders, M. E., Shamir, R., Swann, J. R., Szajewska, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00440-6 · Cited by 2,488
Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria
(2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118960608 · Cited by 2,219
Swanson, K. S., Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Reimer, R. A., Reid, G., Verbeke, K., Scott, K. P., Holscher, H. D., Azad, M. B., Delzenne, N. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0344-2 · Cited by 2,196
Zmora, N., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Suez, J., Mor, U., Dori-Bachash, M., Bashiardes, S., Kotler, E., Zur, M., Regev-Lehavi, D., Brik, R. B.-Z., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041 · Cited by 1,695
Mechanisms of action of probiotics
Plaza-Diaz, J., Ruiz-Ojeda, F. J., Gil-Campos, M., & Gil, A. (2019) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy063 · Cited by 1,423
The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics
Suez, J., Zmora, N., Segal, E., & Elinav, E. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0439-x · Cited by 1,398
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2002, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food.: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group Report
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rastogi, S., & Singh, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1042189 · Cited by 328
Anumudu, C. K., Miri, T., & Onyeaka, H. N. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13233714 · Cited by 317
Shah, A. B., Baiseitova, A., Zahoor, M., Ahmad, I., Ikram, M., Bakhsh, A., Shah, M. A., Ali, I., Idress, M., Ullah, R., et al. (2024) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2024.2431643 · Cited by 220
DuPont, H. L., Suescun, J., Jiang, Z.-D., Brown, E. L., Essigmann, H. T., Alexander, A. S., DuPont, A. W., Iqbal, T., Utay, N. S., Newmark, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1104759 · Cited by 162
Varghese, S., Rao, S., Khattak, A., Zamir, F., & Chaari, A. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16213663 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Dempsey, E., & Corr, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Corr, Sinéad C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Immunology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-04-06
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 840245-840245
- ISSN
- 1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9019120
- OpenAlex
- W4225650845
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 145 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 16
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus, probiotics, gut health, probiotic mechanisms of action, interindividual variability, strain differences, gut microbiota, health benefits
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Humans, Lactobacillus, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
