Cited by 581Probiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections researchGut microbiota and health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lactobacillus spp. for Gastrointestinal Health: Current and Future Perspectives

Open access
Dempsey, Elaine, Corr, Sinéad C.·2022·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

In recent decades, probiotic bacteria have become increasingly popular as a result of mounting scientific evidence to indicate their beneficial role in modulating human health. Although there is strong evidence associating various Lactobacillus probiotics to various health benefits, further research is needed, in particular to determine the various mechanisms by which probiotics may exert these effects and indeed to gauge inter-individual value one can expect from consuming these products. One must take into consideration the differences in individual and combination strains, and conditions which create difficulty in making direct comparisons. The aim of this paper is to review the current understanding of the means by which Lactobacillus species stand to benefit our gastrointestinal health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2022.840245

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Probiotic mechanisms of intestinal barrier enhancement.
Figure 1 Probiotic mechanisms of intestinal barrier enhancement.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Representation of the Lactobacillus cell surface structure including important effector molecules.
Figure 2 Representation of the Lactobacillus cell surface structure including important effector molecules.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 164 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2002, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food.: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group Report

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dempsey, E., & Corr, S. C.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Corr, Sinéad C.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2022-04-06
Volume
13
Pages
840245-840245
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225650845
Cited by
579
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 145 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 16
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
Lactobacillus, probiotics, gut health, probiotic mechanisms of action, interindividual variability, strain differences, gut microbiota, health benefits
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Humans, Lactobacillus, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review