Cited by 48Wound Healing and TreatmentsHemostasis and retained surgical itemsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Physiological fibrin hydrogel modulates immune cells and molecules and accelerates mouse skin wound healing

Open access
Pereira, Rafaela Vaz Sousa, EzEldeen, Mostafa, Ugarte-Berzal, Estefania, Martens, Erik, Malengier-Devlies, Bert, Vandooren, Jennifer, Vranckx, Jan Jeroen, Matthys, Patrick +1 more·2023·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Introduction: Wound healing is a complex process to restore homeostasis after injury and insufficient skin wound healing is a considerable problem in medicine. Whereas many attempts of regenerative medicine have been made for wound healing with growth factors and cell therapies, simple pharmacological and immunological studies are lagging behind. We investigated how fibrin hydrogels modulate immune cells and molecules in skin wound healing in mice. Methods: Physiological fibrin hydrogels (3.5 mg/mL fibrinogen) were generated, biophysically analyzed for stiffness and protein contents and were structurally studied by scanning electron microscopy. Physiological fibrin hydrogels were applied to full thickness skin wounds and, after 3 days, cells and molecules in wound tissues were analyzed. Leukocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and keratinocytes were explored with the use of Flow Cytometry, whereas cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases were analyzed with the use of qPCR, ELISAs and zymography. Skin wound healing was analyzed microscopically at day 3, macroscopically followed daily during repair in mice and compared with commercially available fibrin sealant Tisseel. Results: Exogenous fibrin at physiological concentrations decreased neutrophil and increased non-classical Ly6Clow monocyte and resolutive macrophage (CD206 + and CX3CR1 + ) populations, at day 3 after injury. Fibrin hydrogel reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased IL-10 levels. In line with these findings, gelatinase B/MMP-9 was decreased, whereas gelatinase A/MMP-2 levels remained unaltered. Frequencies of dermal endothelial cells, fibroblasts and keratinocytes were increased and keratinocyte migration was enhanced by fibrin hydrogel. Importantly, physiological fibrin accelerated the healing of skin wounds in contrast to the highly concentrated fibrin sealant Tisseel, which delayed wound repair and possessed a higher fiber density. Conclusion: Collectively, we show that adding a tailored fibrin hydrogel scaffold to a wound bed positively influences the healing process, modulating leukocyte populations and inflammatory responses towards a faster wound repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1170153

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of fibrin as standalone adhesion barriers is limited because fibrin can contribute to adhesion formation.

    “However, their use as standalone adhesion barriers is limited because fibrin can contribute to adhesion formation [71,72,73].”

    From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says dense fibrin networks may impair cell migration and slow skin wound healing. Neither that passage nor the Introduction (page unavailable) addresses whether fibrin contributes to adhesion formation or is limited as a standalone adhesion barrier; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. [1]Gurtner GC Werner S Barrandon Y Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature (2008) 453(7193): 314–21. doi: 10.1038/nature07039 18480812 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Opdenakker G Van Damme J Vranckx JJ. Immunomodulation as rescue for chronic atonic skin wounds. Trends Immunol (2018) 39(4): 341–54. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.01.010 29500031 · DOI
  3. [3]Posnett J Gottrup F Lundgren H Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care (2009) 18(4): 154–61. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41607 19349935 · DOI
  4. [4]Weisel JW Litvinov RI. Mechanisms of fibrin polymerization and clinical implications. Blood (2013) 121(10): 1712–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-306639 PMC3591795 23305734 · DOI
  5. [5]Kearney KJ Ariens RAS Macrae FL. The role of fibrin(ogen) in wound healing and infection control. Semin Thromb Hemost (2022) 48(2): 174–87. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732467 34428799 · DOI
  6. [6]Etulain J. Platelets in wound healing and regenerative medicine. Platelets (2018) 29(6): 556–68. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1430357 29442539 · DOI
  7. [7]Heldin CH Westermark B. Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev (1999) 79(4): 1283–316. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1283 10508235 · DOI
  8. [9]Krzyszczyk P Schloss R Palmer A Berthiaume F. The role of macrophages in acute and chronic wound healing and interventions to promote pro-wound healing phenotypes. Front Physiol (2018) 9: 419. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00419 29765329 PMC5938667 · DOI
  9. [10]Ruytinx P Proost P Van Damme J Struyf S. Chemokine-induced macrophage polarization in inflammatory conditions. Front Immunol (2018) 9: 1930. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01930 30245686 PMC6137099 · DOI
  10. [11]Luu TU Liu WF. Regulation of macrophages by extracellular matrix composition and adhesion geometry. Regenerative Eng Trans Med (2018) 4(4): 238–46. doi: 10.1007/s40883-018-0065-z · DOI
  11. [14]Sridharan R CAR Kelly DJ Kearney CJ O’Brien FJ. Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles. Mater Today (2015) 18(6): 313–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [15]Antmen E Vrana NE Hasirci V. The role of biomaterials and scaffolds in immune responses in regenerative medicine: macrophage phenotype modulation by biomaterial properties and scaffold architectures. Biomater Sci (2021) 9(24): 8090–110. doi: 10.1039/D1BM00840D 34762077 · DOI
  13. [16]Bayer IS. Advances in fibrin-based materials in wound repair: a review. molecules. Molecules (2022) 27(14): 4504. doi: 10.3390/molecules27144504 35889381 PMC9322155 · DOI
  14. [17]Feng X Clark RA Galanakis D Tonnesen MG. Fibrin and collagen differentially regulate human dermal microvascular endothelial cell integrins: stabilization of alphav/beta3 mRNA by fibrin. J Invest Dermatol (1999) 113(6): 913–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00786.x 10594730 · DOI
  15. [18]Clark RA Lanigan JM DellaPelle P Manseau E Dvorak HF Colvin RB. Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. J Invest Dermatol (1982) 79(5): 264–9. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12500075 6752288 · DOI
  16. [19]Clark RA. Fibrin sealant in wound repair: a systematic survey of the literature. Expert Opin Investig Drugs (2000) 9(10): 2371–92. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.10.2371 11060813 · DOI
  17. [20]Heher P Muhleder S Mittermayr R Redl H Slezak P. Fibrin-based delivery strategies for acute and chronic wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2018) 129: 134–47. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.007 29247766 · DOI
  18. [21]EzEldeen M Toprakhisar B Murgia D Smisdom N Deschaume O Bartic C. Chlorite oxidized oxyamylose differentially influences the microstructure of fibrin and self assembling peptide hydrogels as well as dental pulp stem cell behavior. Sci Rep (2021) 11(1): 5687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84405-4 33707502 PMC7952722 · DOI
  19. [22]Azadani AN Matthews PB Ge L Shen Y Jhun CS Guy TS. Mechanical properties of surgical glues used in aortic root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg (2009) 87(4): 1154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.072 19324142 · DOI
  20. [23]Vandooren J Geurts N Martens E Van den Steen PE Opdenakker G. Zymography methods for visualizing hydrolytic enzymes. Nat Methods (2013) 10(3): 211–20. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2371 23443633 · DOI
  21. [24]Rorvig S Ostergaard O Heegaard NH Borregaard N. Proteome profiling of human neutrophil granule subsets, secretory vesicles, and cell membrane: correlation with transcriptome profiling of neutrophil precursors. J Leukoc Biol (2013) 94(4): 711–21. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1212619 23650620 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [25]Adrover JM Aroca-Crevillen A Crainiciuc G Ostos F Rojas-Vega Y Rubio-Ponce A. Programmed 'disarming' of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(2): 135–44. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0571-2 PMC7223223 31932813 · DOI
  23. [26]Vagesjo E Grigoleit P Fasth A Phillipson M. How can we optimize the development of drugs for wound healing? Expert Opin Drug Discov (2022) 17(2): 93–6. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.1992381 34651533 · DOI
  24. [27]Drew AF Liu H Davidson JM Daugherty CC Degen JL. Wound-healing defects in mice lacking fibrinogen. Blood (2001) 97(12): 3691–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.12.3691 11389004 · DOI
  25. [28]Kouketsu A Shimizu Y Nogami S Yamada-Fujiwara M Nagai H Yamauchi K. Wound healing effect of autologous fibrin glue and polyglycolic acid sheets in a rat back skin defect model. Transfus Apher Sci (2021) 60(4): 103144. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103144 33893027 · DOI
  26. [29]Gugerell A Pasteiner W Nurnberger S Kober J Meinl A Pfeifer S. Thrombin as important factor for cutaneous wound healing: comparison of fibrin biomatrices in vitro and in a rat excisional wound healing model. Wound Repair Regen (2014) 22(6): 740–8. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12234 25231003 · DOI
  27. [30]Melendez MM Martinez RR Dagum AB McClain SA Simon M Sobanko J. Porcine wound healing in full-thickness skin defects using integra with and without fibrin glue with keratinocytes. Can J Plast Surg (2008) 16(3): 147–52. doi: 10.1177/229255030801600310 PMC2691008 19721792 · DOI
  28. [31]Jara CP Wang O Paulino do Prado T Ismail A Fabian FM Li H. Novel fibrin-fibronectin matrix accelerates mice skin wound healing. Bioact Mater (2020) 5(4): 949–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.015 PMC7334397 32671290 · DOI
  29. [32]Ding Y Cui L Zhao Q Zhang W Sun H Zheng L. Platelet-rich fibrin accelerates skin wound healing in diabetic mice. Ann Plast Surg (2017) 79(3): e15–e9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001091 28650409 · DOI
  30. [33]Nilforoushzadeh MA Sisakht MM Amirkhani MA Seifalian AM Banafshe HR Verdi J. Engineered skin graft with stromal vascular fraction cells encapsulated in fibrin-collagen hydrogel: a clinical study for diabetic wound healing. J Tissue Eng Regener Med (2020) 14(3): 424–40. doi: 10.1002/term.3003 31826321 · DOI
  31. [34]Flick MJ Du X Witte DP Jirouskova M Soloviev DA Busuttil SJ. Leukocyte engagement of fibrin(ogen) via the integrin receptor alphaMbeta2/Mac-1 is critical for host inflammatory response in vivo. J Clin Invest (2004) 113(11): 1596–606. doi: 10.1172/JCI20741 PMC419487 15173886 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [35]Lishko VK Kudryk B Yakubenko VP Yee VC Ugarova TP. Regulated unmasking of the cryptic binding site for integrin alpha m beta 2 in the gamma c-domain of fibrinogen. Biochemistry (2002) 41(43): 12942–51. doi: 10.1021/bi026324c 12390020 · DOI
  33. [36]Kimball A Schaller M Joshi A Davis FM denDekker A Boniakowski A. Ly6C(Hi) blood Monocyte/Macrophage drive chronic inflammation and impair wound healing in diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2018) 38(5): 1102–14. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.310703 PMC5920725 29496661 · DOI
  34. [37]Varga T Mounier R Horvath A Cuvellier S Dumont F Poliska S. Highly dynamic transcriptional signature of distinct macrophage subsets during sterile inflammation, resolution, and tissue repair. J Immunol (2016) 196(11): 4771–82. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502490 27183604 · DOI
  35. [38]Ishida Y Gao JL Murphy PM. Chemokine receptor CX3CR1 mediates skin wound healing by promoting macrophage and fibroblast accumulation and function. J Immunol (2008) 180(1): 569–79. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.1.569 18097059 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [39]Stein M Keshav S Harris N Gordon S. Interleukin 4 potently enhances murine macrophage mannose receptor activity: a marker of alternative immunologic macrophage activation. J Exp Med (1992) 176(1): 287–92. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.1.287 PMC2119288 1613462 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [42]Burgess M Wicks K Gardasevic M Mace KA. Cx3CR1 expression identifies distinct macrophage populations that contribute differentially to inflammation and repair. Immunohorizons (2019) 3(7): 262–73. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1900038 31356156 · DOI
  38. [43]Hsieh JY Smith TD Meli VS Tran TN Botvinick EL Liu WF. Differential regulation of macrophage inflammatory activation by fibrin and fibrinogen. Acta Biomater (2017) 47: 14– 24. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.024 27662809 PMC5426227 · DOI
  39. [44]Tanaka R Saito Y Fujiwara Y Jo JI Tabata Y. Preparation of fibrin hydrogels to promote the recruitment of anti-inflammatory macrophages. Acta Biomater (2019) 89: 152–65. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.011 30862554 · DOI
  40. [45]Liu Y Min D Bolton T Nube V Twigg SM Yue DK. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 predicts poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care (2009) 32(1): 117–9. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0763 PMC2606842 18835949 · DOI
  41. [46]Feng X Tonnesen MG Mousa SA Clark RA. Fibrin and collagen differentially but synergistically regulate sprout angiogenesis of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells in 3-dimensional matrix. Int J Cell Biol (2013) 2013: 231279. doi: 10.1155/2013/231279 23737792 PMC3657431 · DOI
  42. [47]Suehiro K Gailit J Plow EF. Fibrinogen is a ligand for integrin alpha5beta1 on endothelial cells. J Biol Chem (1997) 272(8): 5360–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.8.5360 9030612 · DOI
  43. [48]Martinez J Ferber A Bach TL Yaen CH. Interaction of fibrin with VE-cadherin. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2001) 936: 386– 405. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03524.x 11460494 · DOI
  44. [49]Sahni A Francis CW. Vascular endothelial growth factor binds to fibrinogen and fibrin and stimulates endothelial cell proliferation. Blood (2000) 96(12): 3772–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.V96.12.3772 11090059 · DOI
  45. [50]Ratajczak J Hilkens P Gervois P Wolfs E Jacobs R Lambrichts I. Angiogenic capacity of periodontal ligament stem cells pretreated with deferoxamine and/or fibroblast growth factor-2. PloS One (2016) 11(12): e0167807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167807 27936076 PMC5147980 · DOI
  46. [51]Thompson WD Smith EB Stirk CM Marshall FI Stout AJ Kocchar A. Angiogenic activity of fibrin degradation products is located in fibrin fragment e. J Pathol (1992) 168(1): 47– 53. doi: 10.1002/path.1711680109 1280677 · DOI
  47. [52]Bootle-Wilbraham CA Tazzyman S Thompson WD Stirk CM Lewis CE. Fibrin fragment e stimulates the proliferation, migration and differentiation of human microvascular endothelial cells in vitro. Angiogenesis (2001) 4(4): 269–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1016076121918 12197472 · DOI
  48. [53]Gailit J Clarke C Newman D Tonnesen MG Mosesson MW Clark RA. Human fibroblasts bind directly to fibrinogen at RGD sites through integrin alpha(v)beta3. Exp Cell Res (1997) 232(1): 118–26. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3512 9141628 · DOI
  49. [54]Sporn LA Bunce LA Francis CW. Cell proliferation on fibrin: modulation by fibrinopeptide cleavage. Blood (1995) 86(5): 1802–10. doi: 10.1182/blood.V86.5.1802.bloodjournal8651802 7655010 · DOI
  50. [55]Brown LF Lanir N McDonagh J Tognazzi K Dvorak AM Dvorak HF. Fibroblast migration in fibrin gel matrices. Am J Pathol (1993) 142(1): 273–83. PMC1886838 8424460
  51. [56]Tuan TL Song A Chang S Younai S Nimni ME. In vitro Fibroplasia: matrix contraction, cell growth, and collagen production of fibroblasts cultured in fibrin gels. Exp Cell Res (1996) 223(1): 127–34. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0065 8635484 · DOI
  52. [57]Geer DJ Swartz DD Andreadis ST. Fibrin promotes migration in a three-dimensional in vitro model of wound regeneration. Tissue Eng (2002) 8(5): 787–98. doi: 10.1089/10763270260424141 12459057 · DOI
  53. [58]Geer DJ Andreadis ST. A novel role of fibrin in epidermal healing: plasminogen-mediated migration and selective detachment of differentiated keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol (2003) 121(5): 1210–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12512.x 14708628 · DOI
  54. [59]Duong H Wu B Tawil B. Modulation of 3D fibrin matrix stiffness by intrinsic fibrinogen-thrombin compositions and by extrinsic cellular activity. Tissue Eng Part A (2009) 15(7): 1865–76. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0319 PMC2749875 19309239 · DOI
  55. [60]Kurniawan NA Grimbergen J Koopman J Koenderink GH. Factor XIII stiffens fibrin clots by causing fiber compaction. J Thromb Haemost (2014) 12(10): 1687–96. doi: 10.1111/jth.12705 25142383 · DOI
  56. [61]Michel D Harmand MF. Fibrin seal in wound healing: effect of thrombin and [Ca2+] on human skin fibroblast growth and collagen production. J Dermatol Sci (1990) 1(5): 325–33. doi: 10.1016/0923-1811(90)90589-6 2073491 · DOI
  57. [62]Haworth KJ Weidner CR Abruzzo TA Shearn JT Holland CK. Mechanical properties and fibrin characteristics of endovascular coil-clot complexes: relevance to endovascular cerebral aneurysm repair paradigms. J Neurointerv Surg (2015) 7(4): 291–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011076 PMC4478590 24668257 · DOI
  58. [63]Lasa CI Jr. Kidd RR 3rd, Nunez HA Drohan WN. Effect of fibrin glue and opsite on open wounds in DB/DB mice. J Surg Res (1993) 54(3): 202–6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1993.1032 8474236 · DOI
  59. [64]Sridharan R Cavanagh B Cameron AR Kelly DJ O'Brien FJ. Material stiffness influences the polarization state, function and migration mode of macrophages. Acta Biomater (2019) 89: 47– 59. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.048 30826478 · DOI · Paper page
  60. [65]Chapin JC Hajjar KA. Fibrinolysis and the control of blood coagulation. Blood Rev (2015) 29(1): 17– 24. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2014.09.003 25294122 PMC4314363 · DOI
  61. [66]Romer J Bugge TH Pyke C Lund LR Flick MJ Degen JL. Impaired wound healing in mice with a disrupted plasminogen gene. Nat Med (1996) 2(3): 287–92. doi: 10.1038/nm0396-287 8612226 · DOI
  62. [67]Lund LR Romer J Bugge TH Nielsen BS Frandsen TL Degen JL. Functional overlap between two classes of matrix-degrading proteases in wound healing. EMBO J (1999) 18(17): 4645–56. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.17.4645 PMC1171538 10469644 · DOI
  63. [68]Collet JP Park D Lesty C Soria J Soria C Montalescot G. Influence of fibrin network conformation and fibrin fiber diameter on fibrinolysis speed: dynamic and structural approaches by confocal microscopy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2000) 20(5): 1354–61. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.5.1354 10807754 · DOI
  64. [69]Man AJ Davis HE Itoh A Leach JK Bannerman P. Neurite outgrowth in fibrin gels is regulated by substrate stiffness. Tissue Eng Part A (2011) 17(23-24): 2931–42. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0030 21882895 · DOI
  65. [70]Sulniute R Shen Y Guo YZ Fallah M Ahlskog N Ny L. Plasminogen is a critical regulator of cutaneous wound healing. Thromb Haemost (2016) 115(5): 1001–9. doi: 10.1160/TH15-08-0653 26791370 · DOI
  66. [71]Silva LM Doyle AD Greenwell-Wild T Dutzan N Tran CL Abusleme L. Fibrin is a critical regulator of neutrophil effector function at the oral mucosal barrier. Science (2021) 374(6575): eabl5450. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5450 34941394 PMC11960105 · DOI
  67. [72]Lahteenmaki K Kuusela P Korhonen TK. Bacterial plasminogen activators and receptors. FEMS Microbiol Rev (2001) 25(5): 531–52. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(01)00067-5 11742690 · DOI
  68. [73]Wang X Ge J Tredget EE Wu Y. The mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell transplantation. Nat Protoc (2013) 8(2): 302–9. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.002 23329003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, R. V. S., EzEldeen, M., Ugarte-Berzal, E., Martens, E., Malengier-Devlies, B., Vandooren, J., Vranckx, J. J., Matthys, P., & Opdenakker, G.
Affiliations
  • Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Opdenakker, Ghislain
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2023-04-24
Volume
14
Pages
1170153-1170153
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366828359
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0A5716N)
  • KU Leuven
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Rega Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemostasis and retained surgical items
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
fibrin gel, skin wound healing, full-thickness skin wounds, immune cell modulation, inflammatory cytokines, IL-10, matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-9, MMP-2, keratinocyte migration, leukocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, hydrogel stiffness
MeSH terms
Animals, Fibrin, Wound Healing, Fibrin Tissue Adhesive, Cytokines, Hydrogels, Endothelial Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review