CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAbdominal Surgery and Complications

Fluids or vasopressors for the initial resuscitation of septic shock

Open access
Macdonald, Stephen, Peake, Sandra L., Corfield, Alasdair R., Delaney, Anthony·2022·Frontiers in Medicine
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.1069782PMC PMC9729725
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Intravenous fluid resuscitation is recommended first-line treatment for sepsis-associated hypotension and/or hypoperfusion. The rationale is to restore circulating volume and optimize cardiac output in the setting of shock. Nonetheless, there is limited high-level evidence to support this practice. Over the past decade emerging evidence of harm associated with large volume fluid resuscitation among patients with septic shock has led to calls for a more conservative approach. Specifically, clinical trials undertaken in Africa have found harm associated with initial fluid resuscitation in the setting of infection and hypoperfusion. While translating these findings to practice in other settings is problematic, there has been a re-appraisal of current practice with some recommending earlier use of vasopressors rather than repeated fluid boluses as an alternative to restore perfusion in septic shock. There is consequently uncertainty and variation in practice. The question of fluids or vasopressors for initial resuscitation in septic shock is the subject of international multicentre clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2022.1069782

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a clinical trial completed in Africa, aggressive fluid strategies for septic patients were associated with worsening respiratory status and mortality.

    “In a clinical trial completed in Africa, aggressive fluid strategies for septic patients were associated with worsening respiratory status and mortality, underscoring that one-size-fits-all approach should not be standard practice [21].”

    From Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The “Evidence of harm with fluids” section reports that two trials in Africa found higher mortality among septic patients receiving larger IV fluid volumes. It does not report worsening respiratory status in those trials; it says the excess mortality was due to persistent shock. The paper also cautions against directly applying those results to high-income settings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. [1]Finfer S Bellomo R Boyce N French J Myburgh J Norton R A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350: 2247– 56. 10.1056/NEJMoa040232 15163774 · DOI
  2. [2]Caironi P Tognoni G Masson S Fumagalli R Pesenti A Romero M Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2014) 370: 1412– 21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1305727 24635772 · DOI
  3. [3]Myburgh JA Finfer S Bellomo R Billot L Cass A Gattas D Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. (2012) 367: 1901– 11. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209759 23075127 · DOI
  4. [4]Self WH Semler MW Wanderer JP Wang L Byrne DW Collins SP Balanced crystalloids versus saline in noncritically ill adults. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378: 819– 28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1711586 29485926 PMC5846618 · DOI
  5. [5]Semler MW Self WH Wanderer JP Ehrenfeld JM Wang L Byrne DW Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378: 829– 39. 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584 29485925 PMC5846085 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Finfer S Micallef S Hammond N Navarra L Bellomo R Billot L Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386: 815– 26. 10.1056/NEJMoa2114464 35041780 · DOI
  7. [8]Singer M Deutschman CS Seymour CW Shankar-Hari M Annane D Bauer M The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. (2016) 315: 801– 10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 26903338 PMC4968574 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Angus DC van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369: 840– 51. 10.1056/NEJMra1208623 23984731 · DOI
  9. [10]Raia L Zafrani L. Endothelial activation and microcirculatory disorders in sepsis. Front Med. (2022) 9: 907992. 10.3389/fmed.2022.907992 35721048 PMC9204048 · DOI
  10. [11]Jedlicka J Becker BF Chappell D. Endothelial glycocalyx. Crit Care Clin. (2020) 36: 217– 32. 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.12.007 32172810 · DOI
  11. [12]Ince C Mayeux PR Nguyen T Gomez H Kellum JA Ospina-Tascon GA The endothelium in sepsis. Shock. (2016) 45: 259– 70. 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000473 26871664 PMC5281063 · DOI
  12. [13]Singer M. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis-induced multi-organ failure. Virulence. (2014) 5: 66– 72. 10.4161/viru.26907 24185508 PMC3916385 · DOI
  13. [14]Preau S Vodovar D Jung B Lancel S Zafrani L Flatres A Energetic dysfunction in sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. (2021) 11: 104. 10.1186/s13613-021-00893-7 34216304 PMC8254847 · DOI
  14. [15]Casserly B Phillips GS Schorr C Dellinger RP Townsend SR Osborn TM Lactate measurements in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion: results from the surviving sepsis campaign database. Crit Care Med. (2015) 43: 567– 73. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000742 25479113 · DOI
  15. [16]Garcia-Alvarez M Marik P Bellomo R. Stress hyperlactataemia: present understanding and controversy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2014) 2: 339– 47. 10.1016/S2213-858770154-2 24703052 · DOI
  16. [17]Singer M De Santis V Vitale D Jeffcoate W. Multiorgan failure is an adaptive, endocrine-mediated, metabolic response to overwhelming systemic inflammation. Lancet. (2004) 364: 545– 8. 10.1016/S0140-673616815-3 15302200 · DOI
  17. [18]Thijs LG Schneider AJ Groeneveld AB. The haemodynamics of septic shock. Intensive Care Med. (1990) 16 (Suppl. 3): S182– 6. 10.1007/BF01709697 2289987 · DOI
  18. [19]Burgdorff AM Bucher M Schumann J. Vasoplegia in patients with sepsis and septic shock: pathways and mechanisms. J Int Med Res. (2018) 46: 1303– 10. 10.1177/0300060517743836 29332515 PMC6091823 · DOI
  19. [20]Burnham JP Kollef MH. Understanding toxic shock syndrome. Intensive Care Med. (2015) 41: 1707– 10. 10.1007/s00134-015-3861-7 25971393 · DOI
  20. [21]Mogensen TH. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2009) 22: 240– 73, Table of Contents. 10.1128/CMR.00046-08 19366914 PMC2668232 · DOI
  21. [22]Annane D. The role of ACTH and corticosteroids for sepsis and septic shock: an update. Front Endocrinol. (2016) 7: 70. 10.3389/fendo.2016.00070 27379022 PMC4913096 · DOI
  22. [24]Annane D Renault A Brun-Buisson C Megarbane B Quenot JP Siami S Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378: 809– 18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1705716 29490185 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [25]De Backer D Ricottilli F Ospina-Tascon GA. Septic shock: a microcirculation disease. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. (2021) 34: 85– 91. 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000957 33577205 · DOI
  24. [26]Ince C Boerma EC Cecconi M De Backer D Shapiro NI Duranteau J Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. (2018) 44: 281– 99. 10.1007/s00134-018-5070-7 29411044 · DOI
  25. [27]De Backer D Creteur J Preiser JC Dubois MJ Vincent JL. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2002) 166: 98– 104. 10.1164/rccm.200109-016oc 12091178 · DOI
  26. [28]Sakr Y Dubois MJ De Backer D Creteur J Vincent JL. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. (2004) 32: 1825– 31. 15343008
  27. [29]Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care. (2015) 19 (Suppl. 3): S8. 10.1186/cc14726 26729241 PMC4699073 · DOI
  28. [30]Legrand M De Backer D Depret F Ait-Oufella H. Recruiting the microcirculation in septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. (2019) 9: 102. 10.1186/s13613-019-0577-9 31512059 PMC6738355 · DOI
  29. [31]Bennett VA Vidouris A Cecconi M. Effects of fluids on the macro- and microcirculations. Crit Care. (2018) 22: 74. 10.1186/s13054-018-1993-1 29558989 PMC5861604 · DOI
  30. [32]Evans L Rhodes A Alhazzani W Antonelli M Coopersmith CM French C Executive summary: surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. (2021) 49: 1974– 82. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005357 34643578 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [33]Monnet X Marik PE Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. (2016) 6: 111. 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7 27858374 PMC5114218 · DOI
  32. [34]Raia L Gabarre P Bonny V Urbina T Missri L Boelle PY Kinetics of capillary refill time after fluid challenge. Ann Intensive Care. (2022) 12: 74. 10.1186/s13613-022-01049-x 35962860 PMC9375797 · DOI
  33. [35]Ait-Oufella H Lemoinne S Boelle PY Galbois A Baudel JL Lemant J Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. (2011) 37: 801– 7. 10.1007/s00134-011-2163-y 21373821 · DOI
  34. [36]Dumas G Lavillegrand JR Joffre J Bige N de-Moura EB Baudel JL Mottling score is a strong predictor of 14-day mortality in septic patients whatever vasopressor doses and other tissue perfusion parameters. Crit Care. (2019) 23: 211. 10.1186/s13054-019-2496-4 31182133 PMC6558704 · DOI
  35. [37]Jacquet-Lagreze M Bouhamri N Portran P Schweizer R Baudin F Lilot M Capillary refill time variation induced by passive leg raising predicts capillary refill time response to volume expansion. Crit Care. (2019) 23: 281. 10.1186/s13054-019-2560-0 31420052 PMC6697974 · DOI
  36. [38]Hernández G Ospina-Tascón GA Damiani LP Estenssoro E Dubin A Hurtado J Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock. JAMA. (2019) 321: 654– 64. 10.1001/jama.2019.0071 30772908 PMC6439620 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [39]Ehrman RR Gallien JZ Smith RK Akers KG Malik AN Harrison NE Resuscitation guided by volume responsiveness does not reduce mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor. (2019) 1: e0015. 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000015 32166259 PMC7063966 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [40]Cecconi M Hofer C Teboul JL Pettila V Wilkman E Molnar Z Fluid challenges in intensive care: the Fenice study: a global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. (2015) 41: 1529– 37. 10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x 26162676 PMC4550653 · DOI
  39. [41]Bihari S Teubner DJ Prakash S Beatty T Morphett M Bellomo R Fluid bolus therapy in emergency department patients: indications and physiological changes. Emerg Med Australas. (2016) 28: 531– 7. 10.1111/1742-6723.12621 27374939 · DOI
  40. [42]Hjortrup PB Haase N Wetterslev J Lange T Bundgaard H Rasmussen BS Effects of fluid restriction on measures of circulatory efficacy in adults with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (2017) 61: 390– 8. 10.1111/aas.12862 28150304 · DOI
  41. [43]Rivers E Nguyen B Havstad S Ressler J Muzzin A Knoblich B Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2001) 345: 1368– 77. 10.1056/NEJMoa010307 11794169 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [44]Rhodes A Evans LE Alhazzani W Levy MM Antonelli M Ferrer R Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43: 304– 77. 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 28101605 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [45]Pro CI Yealy DM Kellum JA Huang DT Barnato AE Weissfeld LA A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2014) 370: 1683– 93. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602 24635773 PMC4101700 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [46]ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Peake SL Delaney A Bailey M Bellomo R Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2014) 371: 1496– 506. 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380 25272316 · DOI
  45. [48]PRISM Investigators, Rowan KM Angus DC Bailey M Barnato AE Bellomo R Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock – A patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376: 2223– 34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701380 28320242 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [49]Sirvent JM Ferri C Baro A Murcia C Lorencio C. Fluid balance in sepsis and septic shock as a determining factor of mortality. Am J Emerg Med. (2015) 33: 186– 9. 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.016 25483379 · DOI
  47. [50]Seymour CW Gesten F Prescott HC Friedrich ME Iwashyna TJ Phillips GS Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376: 2235– 44. 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058 28528569 PMC5538258 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [51]Maitland KKS Opoka RO Engoru C Olupot-Olupot P Akech SO Nyeko R Mortality after fluid olus in Africal children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364: 2483– 95. 21615299
  49. [53]Maitland K George EC Evans JA Kiguli S Olupot-Olupot P Akech SO Exploring mechanisms of excess mortality with early fluid resuscitation: insights from the feast trial. BMC Med. (2013) 11: 68. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-68 23496872 PMC3599745 · DOI
  50. [54]Sennoun N Montemont C Gibot S Lacolley P Levy B. Comparative effects of early versus delayed use of norepinephrine in resuscitated endotoxic shock. Crit Care Med. (2007) 35: 1736– 40. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000269028.28521.08 17522580 · DOI
  51. [55]Sakr Y Rubatto Birri PN Kotfis K Nanchal R Shah B Kluge S Higher fluid balance increases the risk of death from sepsis: results from a large international audit. Crit Care Med. (2017) 45: 386– 94. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002189 27922878 · DOI
  52. [56]Kelm DJ Perrin JT Cartin-Ceba R Gajic O Schenck L Kennedy CC. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. (2015) 43: 68– 73. 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000268 25247784 PMC4269557 · DOI
  53. [57]Marik PE Linde-Zwirble WT Bittner EA Sahatjian J Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43: 625– 32. 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y 28130687 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [58]Chappell D Bruegger D Potzel J Jacob M Brettner F Vogeser M Hypervolemia increases release of atrial natriuretic peptide and shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx. Crit Care. (2014) 18: 538. 10.1186/s13054-014-0538-5 25497357 PMC4201669 · DOI
  55. [59]Byrne L Obonyo NG Diab SD Dunster KR Passmore MR Boon AC Unintended consequences: fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2018) 198: 1043– 54. 10.1164/rccm.201801-0064OC 29882682 PMC7613331 · DOI
  56. [60]Stolk RF van der Poll T Angus DC van der Hoeven JG Pickkers P Kox M. Potentially inadvertent immunomodulation: norepinephrine use in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 194: 550– 8. 10.1164/rccm.201604-0862CP 27398737 · DOI
  57. [61]Hamzaoui O Georger JF Monnet X Ksouri H Maizel J Richard C Early administration of norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output in septic patients with life-threatening hypotension. Crit Care. (2010) 14: R142. 10.1186/cc9207 20670424 PMC2945123 · DOI
  58. [62]Hamzaoui O Jozwiak M Geffriaud T Sztrymf B Prat D Jacobs F Norepinephrine exerts an inotropic effect during the early phase of human septic shock. Br J Anaesth. (2018) 120: 517– 24. 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.065 29452808 · DOI
  59. [63]Thooft A Favory R Salgado DR Taccone FS Donadello K De Backer D Effects of changes in arterial pressure on organ perfusion during septic shock. Crit Care. (2011) 15: R222. 10.1186/cc10462 21936903 PMC3334768 · DOI
  60. [64]Jhanji S Stirling S Patel N Hinds CJ Pearse RM. The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. (2009) 37: 1961– 6. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00a1c 19384212 · DOI
  61. [65]Georger JF Hamzaoui O Chaari A Maizel J Richard C Teboul JL. Restoring arterial pressure with norepinephrine improves muscle tissue oxygenation assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy in severely hypotensive septic patients. Intensive Care Med. (2010) 36: 1882– 9. 10.1007/s00134-010-2013-3 20689910 · DOI
  62. [66]Dubin A Pozo MO Casabella CA Palizas F Jr Murias G Moseinco MC Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a propsective study. Crit Care. (2009) 13: R92. 10.1186/cc7922 19534818 PMC2717464 · DOI
  63. [67]Ospina-Tascon GA Hernandez G Alvarez I Calderon-Tapia LE Manzano-Nunez R Sanchez-Ortiz AI Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-based analysis. Crit Care. (2020) 24: 52. 10.1186/s13054-020-2756-3 32059682 PMC7023737 · DOI
  64. [69]Bai X Yu W Ji W Lin Z Tan S Duan K Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Crit Care. (2014) 18: 532. 10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y 25277635 PMC4194405 · DOI
  65. [70]Tian DH Smyth C Keijzers G Macdonald SP Peake S Udy A Safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications: a systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. (2020) 32: 220– 7. 10.1111/1742-6723.13406 31698544 · DOI · Paper page
  66. [72]Macdonald SPJ Keijzers G Taylor DM Kinnear FB Arendts G Fatovich DM Restricted fluid resuscitation in sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a propsective, multicentre, clinical feasibility trial (abstract presented at sepsis 2018, Bangkok Thailand, 1 October 2018). Intensive Care Med Exp. (2018) 6 (Suppl. 1): 21. 10.1186/s40635-018-0196-z 30270404 PMC6165832 · DOI
  67. [73]Corl KA Prodromou M Merchant RC Gareen I Marks S Banerjee D The restrictive IV fluid trial in severe sepsis and septic shock (RIFTS): a randomized pilot study. Crit Care Med. (2019) 47: 951– 9. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003779 30985449 PMC6579683 · DOI · Paper page
  68. [74]Hjortrup PB Haase N Bundgaard H Thomsen SL Winding R Pettila V Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the classic randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial. Intensive Care Med. (2016) 42: 1695– 705. 10.1007/s00134-016-4500-7 27686349 · DOI · Paper page
  69. [75]Permpikul C Tongyoo S Viarasilpa T Trainarongsakul T Chakorn T Udompanturak S. Early use of norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER): a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2019) 199: 1097– 105. 10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC 30704260 · DOI
  70. [76]Meyhoff TS Hjortrup PB Wetterslev J Sivapalan P Laake JH Cronhjort M Restriction of intravenous fluid in ICU patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386: 2459– 70. 10.1056/NEJMoa2202707 35709019 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macdonald, S., Peake, S. L., Corfield, A. R., & Delaney, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Macdonald, Stephen
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
9
Pages
1069782-1069782
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2022.1069782
PMC
PMC9729725
OpenAlex
W4309844100
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
septic shock, fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, sepsis, hypotension, hypoperfusion, clinical practice variation, sepsis treatment guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review