Cited by 25Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationInnovations in Medical Education

Interprofessional collaboration-time for a new theory of action?

Open access
Samuriwo, Ray·2022·Frontiers in Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2022.876715

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genuine changes in behaviour and improvement in any human endeavour can only arise when there is a genuine acceptance of the truth of the situation, specifically facts and issues at hand, including any implicit biases, with a concomitant theory of action.

    “genuine changes in behaviour and improvement in any human endeavour can only arise when there is a genuine acceptance of the truth of the situation, specifically facts and issues at hand, including any implicit biases, with a concomitant theory of action.119”

    From Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [119]

    In “Toward a New Theory of Action” (page unavailable), the paper says meaningful change arises when people understand things as experienced and have a theory of action reflecting their reality. Its discussion concerns improving interprofessional collaboration in healthcare; it does not establish that change in any human endeavour can *only* occur through accepting facts and implicit biases. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [12]Holyoake DD. Is the doctor-nurse game being played? Nurs Times. (2011) 107: 12– 4. 23251967
  2. [13]Whitehead B. Nurses should defy the deeply embedded doctor-nurse game. Nurs Times. (2011) 107: 11. 23251966
  3. [15]WHO. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. Geneva: World Health Organisation (2010). 21174039
  4. [16]IOM. Interprofessional Education for Collaboration: Learning How to Improve Health from Interprofessional Models Across the Continuum of Education to Practice: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and the National Academies Press (2013). 24901189
  5. [28]WHO. Human factors in patient safety. Review of topics and tools. Report for methods and measures working group of WHO Patient Safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation (2009).
  6. [42]Jowett B. The Dialogues of Plato. Translated into English with analyses and introductions in five volumes. Vol. IV. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press (1892).
  7. [43]Campbell L. The Theaetetus of Plato. A Revised Text and English Notes. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press (1883).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuriwo, R.
Affiliations
University of Bradford (GB)
Corresponding author
Samuriwo, Ray
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
9
Pages
876715-876715
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220820079
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, philosophy of action, interprofessional education, health professions education, teamwork

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review