The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations
Open accessAbstract
The incidence of foodborne diseases has increased over the years and resulted in major public health problem globally. Foodborne pathogens can be found in various foods and it is important to detect foodborne pathogens to provide safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. The conventional methods used to detect foodborne pathogen are time consuming and laborious. Hence, a variety of methods have been developed for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens as it is required in many food analyses. Rapid detection methods can be categorized into nucleic acid-based, biosensor-based and immunological-based methods. This review emphasizes on the principles and application of recent rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Detection methods included are simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and oligonucleotide DNA microarray which classified as nucleic acid-based methods; optical, electrochemical and mass-based biosensors which classified as biosensor-based methods; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay which classified as immunological-based methods. In general, rapid detection methods are generally time-efficient, sensitive, specific and labor-saving. The developments of rapid detection methods are vital in prevention and treatment of foodborne diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
Cited by
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Applications of bioluminescence in biotechnology and beyond
Syed, A. J., & Anderson, J. C. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01492c · Cited by 341
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
A review of modern methods for the detection of foodborne pathogens
Aladhadh, M. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11051111 · Cited by 233
Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for food safety and quality assessment
Dridi, F., Marrakchi, M., Gargouri, M., Saulnier, J., Jaffrezic-Renault, N., & Lagarde, F. (2017) · Nanobiosensors · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804301-1.00005-9 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Law, J. W.-F., Ab Mutalib, N.-S., Chan, K.-G., & Lee, L.-H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-01-12
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 770-770
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151996078
- Cited by
- 1,205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770
- The paper
- Law, J. W.-F., Ab Mutalib, N.-S., Chan, K.-G., & Lee, L.-H. (2015). Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.