Cited by 40Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for food safety and quality assessment

Dridi, Fatma, Marrakchi, Mouna, Gargouri, Mohamed, Saulnier, Joelle, Jaffrezic-Renault, Nicole, Lagarde, Florence·2017·Nanobiosensors

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-804301-1.00005-9

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dridi, F., Marrakchi, M., Gargouri, M., Saulnier, J., Jaffrezic-Renault, N., & Lagarde, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Carthage (TN)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Nanobiosensors
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
167-204
OpenAlex
W2584087971
Cited by
40
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
electrochemical biosensor, nanomaterials, food safety, food quality assessment, foodborne pathogens, food toxins, veterinary drug residues, pesticide residues, gold nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, graphene, electron transfer, multi-analyte detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review