The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Associated with Clinical Parameters in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder in women. Gut microbiota has been implicated to play a critical role in metabolic diseases and may modulate the secretion of mediators of the brain-gut axis. Interaction between gut microbiota and the symptoms in PCOS still remains elusive. Here, we showed an altered gut microbiota significantly correlated with PCOS phenotype. There were 33 patients with PCOS (non-obese PCOS individuals, PN, n=12; obese PCOS individuals, PO, n=21) as well as 15 control subjects (non-obese control individuals, CN, n=9; obese control individuals, CO, n=6) enrolled in our study. The plasma levels of serotonin, ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY) were significantly decreased in patients with PCOS compared with controls, and have a significantly negative correlation with waist circumference and testosterone. Sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene in fecal samples revealed the substantial differences of gut microbial species between the PCOS and non-obese controls. Bacterial species were clustered into 23 co-abundance groups (CAGs) based on the SparCC correlation coefficients of their relative abundance. The CAGs increased in PCOS, including the bacteria belonging to Bacteroides, Escherichia/Shigella and Streptococcus, were negatively correlated with ghrelin, and positively correlated with testosterone and BMI. Furthermore, the CAGs that were decreased in PCOS, including the bacteria from Akkermansia and Ruminococcaceae, showed opposite relationship with body-weight, sex-hormone and brain-gut peptides. In conclusion, gut microbial dysbiosis in women with PCOS is associated with the disease phenotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
Edgar, R. C. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2604 · Cited by 16,707
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · Cited by 15,114
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 13,173
An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin
Bray, J. R., & Curtis, J. T. (1957) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942268 · Cited by 11,716
(2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004 · Cited by 9,050
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Cani, P. D., Amar, J., Iglesias, M. A., Poggi, M., Knauf, C., Bastelica, D., Neyrinck, A. M., Fava, F., Tuohy, K. M., Chabo, C., et al. (2007) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db06-1491 · Cited by 6,638
FastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp077 · Cited by 5,602
Cited by
Gut microbiota–bile acid–interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome
Qi, X., Yun, C., Sun, L., Xia, J., Wu, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Liang, X., Wang, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0509-0 · Cited by 846
Anxiety, depression, and the microbiome: A role for gut peptides
Lach, G., Schellekens, H., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2018) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-017-0585-0 · Cited by 573
The impact of the gut microbiota on the reproductive and metabolic endocrine system
Qi, X., Yun, C., Pang, Y., & Qiao, J. (2021) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1894070 · Cited by 554
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology, Current Management, and Future Therapeutics
Singh, S., Pal, N., Shubham, S., Sarma, D. K., Verma, V., Marotta, F., & Kumar, M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12041454 · Cited by 521
Gut microbial diversity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome correlates with hyperandrogenism
Torres, P. J., Siakowska, M., Banaszewska, B., Pawelczyk, L., Duleba, A. J., Kelley, S. T., & Thackray, V. G. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02153 · Cited by 399
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, R., Zhang, C., Shi, Y., Zhang, F., Li, L., Wang, X., Ling, Y., Fu, H., Dong, W., Shen, J., Reeves, A., Greenberg, A. S., Zhao, L., Peng, Y., & Ding, X.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 324-324
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592172277
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Associated with Clinical Parameters in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00324
- The paper
- Liu, R., Zhang, C., Shi, Y., Zhang, F., Li, L., Wang, X., Ling, Y., Fu, H., Dong, W., Shen, J., Reeves, A., Greenberg, A. S., Zhao, L., Peng, Y., & Ding, X. (2017). Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Associated with Clinical Parameters in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.