The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture
Open accessAbstract
The use of excess conventional Phosphorus (P) fertilizers to improve agricultural productivity, in order to meet constantly increasing global food demand, potentially causes surface and ground water pollution, waterway eutrophication, soil fertility depletion, and accumulation of toxic elements such as high concentration of selenium (Se), arsenic (As) in the soil. Quite a number of soil microorganisms are capable of solubilizing/mineralizing insoluble soil phosphate to release soluble P and making it available to plants. These microorganisms improve the growth and yield of a wide variety of crops. Thus, inoculating seeds/crops/soil with Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms (PSM) is a promising strategy to improve world food production without causing any environmental hazard. Despite their great significance in soil fertility improvement, phosphorus-solubilizing microorganisms have yet to replace conventional chemical fertilizers in commercial agriculture. A better understanding of recent developments in PSM functional diversity, colonizing ability, mode of actions and judicious application should facilitate their use as reliable components of sustainable agricultural systems. In this review, we discussed various soil microorganisms that have the ability to solubilize phosphorus and hence have the potential to be used as bio fertilizers. The mechanisms of inorganic phosphate solubilization by PSM and the mechanisms of organic phosphorus mineralization are highlighted together with some factors that determine the success of this technology. Finally we provide some indications that the use of PSM will promote sustainable agriculture and conclude that this technology is ready for commercial exploitation in various regions worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oleńska, E., Małek, W., Wójcik, M., Swiecicka, I., Thijs, S., & Vangronsveld, J. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 · Cited by 555
Hakim, S., Naqqash, T., Nawaz, M. S., Laraib, I., Siddique, M. J., Zia, R., Mirza, M. S., & Imran, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.617157 · Cited by 507
Microalgae, Soil and Plants: A Critical Review of Microalgae as Renewable Resources for Agriculture
Alvarez, A. L., Weyers, S. L., Goemann, H. M., Peyton, B. M., & Gardner, R. D. (2021) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2021.102200 · Cited by 376
Beneficial soil-borne bacteria and fungi: a promising way to improve plant nitrogen acquisition
Dellagi, A., Quillere, I., & Hirel, B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa112 · Cited by 116
Zhou, C., Heal, K., Tigabu, M., Xia, L., Hu, H., Yin, D., & Ma, X. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117635 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Alori, E. T., Glick, B. R., & Babalola, O. O.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-06-02
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 971-971
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2621263386
- Cited by
- 1,669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
- The paper
- Alori, E. T., Glick, B. R., & Babalola, O. O. (2017). Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.