The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Spore-forming bacilli are being explored for the production and preservation of food for many centuries. The inherent ability of production of large number of secretory proteins, enzymes, antimicrobial compounds, vitamins, and carotenoids specifies the importance of bacilli in food chain. Additionally, Bacillus spp. are gaining interest in human health related functional food research coupled with their enhanced tolerance and survivability under hostile environment of gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Besides, bacilli are more stable during processing and storage of food and pharmaceutical preparations, making them more suitable candidate for health promoting formulations. Further, Bacillus strains also possess biotherapeutic potential which is connected with their ability to interact with the internal milieu of the host by producing variety of antimicrobial peptides and small extracellular effector molecules. Nonetheless, with proposed scientific evidences, commercial probiotic supplements and functional foods comprising of Bacillus spp. had not gained much credential in general population, since the debate over probiotic vs pathogen tag of Bacillus in the research and production terrains is confusing consumers. Hence, it’s important to clearly understand the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of selective beneficial Bacillus spp. and their substantiation with those having GRAS status, to reach a consensus over the same. This review highlights the probiotic candidature of spore forming Bacillus spp. and presents an overview of the proposed health benefits, including application in food and pharmaceutical industry. Moreover, the growing need to evaluate the safety of individual Bacillus strains as well as species on a case by case basis and necessity of more profound analysis for the selection and identification of Bacillus probiotic candidates are also taken into consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,451
Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
Kalliomäki, M., Salminen, S., Arvilommi, H., Kero, P., Koskinen, P., & Isolauri, E. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04259-8 · Cited by 2,432
Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions
Stein, T. (2005) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x · Cited by 1,507
The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics: Table 1
Hong, H. A., Duc, L. H., & Cutting, S. M. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.001 · Cited by 975
Doron, S., & Snydman, D. R. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ085 · Cited by 942
Wang, J., Tang, H., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y., Derrien, M., Rocher, E., van-Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T., Strissel, K., Zhao, L., Obin, M., et al. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.99 · Cited by 836
Review: Diversity of Microorganisms in Global Fermented Foods and Beverages
Tamang, J. P., Watanabe, K., & Holzapfel, W. H. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00377 · Cited by 816
Cutting, S. M. (2011) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007 · Cited by 787
Ash, C., Farrow, J. A. E., Wallbanks, S., & Collins, M. D. (2008) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.1991.tb00608.x · Cited by 697
Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species.
Kramer, J. M., Gilbert, R. J., & Doyle, M. P. (1989) · Cited by 479
Cited by
Probiotics in the dairy industry—Advances and opportunities
Gao, J., Li, X., Zhang, G., Sadiq, F. A., Simal‐Gandara, J., Xiao, J., & Sang, Y. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12755 · Cited by 195
Li, Z., Zheng, M., Zheng, J., & Gänzle, M. G. (2023) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101007 · Cited by 128
Efficacy of Probiotics for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Zhang, T., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Sun, F., & Duan, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.859967 · Cited by 125
Caselli, E., Brusaferro, S., Coccagna, M., Arnoldo, L., Berloco, F., Antonioli, P., Tarricone, R., Pelissero, G., Nola, S., La Fauci, V., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199616 · Cited by 101
Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 in Constipation: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Madempudi, R. S., Neelamraju, J., Ahire, J. J., Gupta, S. K., & Shukla, V. K. (2020) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-019-09542-9 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Elshaghabee, F. M. F., Rokana, N., Gulhane, R. D., Sharma, C., & Panwar, H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-08-10
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 1490-1490
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741572010
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 60.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490
- The paper
- Elshaghabee, F. M. F., Rokana, N., Gulhane, R. D., Sharma, C., & Panwar, H. (2017). Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.