Cited by 66Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProtein purification and stabilityFungal and yeast genetics research

Enhancing recombinant protein yields in the E. coli periplasm by combining signal. Peptide and production rate screening

Open access
Karyolaimos, Alexandros, Ampah-Korsah, Henry, Hillenaar, Tamara, Mestre Borras, Anna, Dolata, Katarzyna Magdalena, Sievers, Susanne, Riedel, Katharina, Daniels, Robert +1 more·2019·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

, disulfide bond containing recombinant proteins are often targeted to the periplasm by an N-terminal signal peptide that is removed once it passes through the Sec-translocon in the cytoplasmic membrane. Despite their conserved targeting function, signal peptides can impact recombinant protein production yields in the periplasm, as can the production rate. Here, we present a combined screen involving different signal peptides and varying production rates that enabled the identification of more optimal conditions for periplasmic production of recombinant proteins with disulfide bonds. The data was generated from two targets, a single chain antibody fragment (BL1) and human growth hormone (hGH), with four different signal peptides and a titratable rhamnose promoter-based system that enables the tuning of protein production rates. Across the screen conditions, the yields for both targets significantly varied, and the optimal signal peptide and rhamnose concentration differed for each protein. Under the optimal conditions, the periplasmic BL1 and hGH were properly folded and active. Our study underpins the importance of combinatorial screening approaches for addressing the requirements associated with the production of a recombinant protein in the periplasm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01511

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Karyolaimos and coworkers obtained a yield of around 0.2 g/L of a functional scFv fragment in the periplasm using the OmpA signal peptide and 100 μM rhamnose as inductor.

    “Karyolaimos and coworkers have obtained a yield of around 0.2 g/L of a functional scFv fragment in the periplasm using the OmpA signal peptide and 100 μM rhamnose as inductor [68].”
  • Combinatorial screening of different signal peptides in a titratable system that tunes protein production rates was a valuable and effective approach to enhance scFv recombinant production yields in the periplasm of E. coli.

    “Karyolaimos and coworkers [68] have successfully demonstrated that a combinatorial screening of different signal peptides in a titratable system that tunes protein production rates was a valuable and effective approach to enhance scFv recombinant production yields in the periplasm of E. coli.”
  • The highest periplasmic production yield of an scFv was 0.2 g/L of culture, achieved using the OmpA signal peptide, LB medium and induction with 100 μM rhamnose at 30 °C in a shake flask.

    “The highest periplasmic production yield of an scFv was 0.2 g/L of culture and was achieved using the OmpA signal peptide, LB medium and induction with 100 μM rhamnose at 30 °C in a shake flask [68].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karyolaimos, A., Ampah-Korsah, H., Hillenaar, T., Mestre Borras, A., Dolata, K. M., Sievers, S., Riedel, K., Daniels, R., & de Gier, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2019-07-23
Volume
10
Pages
1511-1511
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964298233
Cited by
66
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2015-05288, K2015-57-21980-04-4)
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (642863)
  • Horizon 2020 (642863)
  • Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (CTS17:111, CTS17:114)
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN272201400005C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
recombinant protein expression, Escherichia coli periplasm, signal peptide, protein production rate, Sec translocon, single-chain antibody fragments, human growth hormone, protein folding, combinatorial screening, periplasmic targeting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review