The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consortium of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Strains Suppresses Sweet Pepper Disease by Altering the Rhizosphere Microbiota
Open accessAbstract
Beneficial microorganisms have been used extensively to make plants more resistant to abiotic and biotic stress. We previously identified a consortium of three plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains (Bacillus cereus AR156, Bacillus subtilis SM21, and Serratia sp. XY21; hereafter “BBS”) as a promising and environmentally friendly biocontrol agent. In this study, the effect of BBS on a soil-borne disease of sweet pepper was evaluated. Application of BBS significantly reduced the prevalence of phytophthora blight and improved fruit quality and soil properties relative to the control. BBS was able to alter the soil bacterial community: it significantly increased the abundances of Burkholderia, Comamonas, and Ramlibacter, which were negatively associated with disease severity, relative to the control. Redundancy analysis suggested that BBS-treated soil samples were dominated by Burkholderia, Comamonas, Ramlibacter, Sporichthya, Achromobacter and Pontibacter; abundance of these genera was related to total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), total potassium (TP) and available phosphorus (AP) contents. This suggests that BBS treatment shifted the microbe community to one that suppressed soil-borne disease and improved the soil chemical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Microbial interactions within beneficial consortia promote soil health
Wu, D., Wang, W., Yao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., & Niu, B. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165801 · Cited by 181
Sharma, I., Sharma, S., Sharma, V., Singh, A. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, A., Singh, J., & Sharma, A. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142678 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L.-N., Wang, D.-C., Hu, Q., Dai, X.-Q., Xie, Y.-S., Li, Q., Liu, H.-M., & Guo, J.-H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-07-23
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1668-1668
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953426284
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consortium of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Strains Suppresses Sweet Pepper Disease by Altering the Rhizosphere Microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01668
- The paper
- Zhang, L.-N., Wang, D.-C., Hu, Q., Dai, X.-Q., Xie, Y.-S., Li, Q., Liu, H.-M., & Guo, J.-H. (2019). Consortium of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Strains Suppresses Sweet Pepper Disease by Altering the Rhizosphere Microbiota. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.