Cited by 114Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

High field FMRI reveals thalamocortical integration of segregated cognitive and emotional processing in mediodorsal and intralaminar thalamic nuclei

Open access
Metzger, Coraline D.·2010·Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

Abstract

Thalamocortical loops, connecting functionally segregated, higher order cortical regions, and basal ganglia, have been proposed not only for well described motor and sensory regions, but also for limbic and prefrontal areas relevant for affective and cognitive processes. These functions are, however, more specific to humans, rendering most invasive neuroanatomical approaches impossible and interspecies translations difficult. In contrast, non-invasive imaging of functional neuroanatomy using fMRI allows for the development of elaborate task paradigms capable of testing the specific functionalities proposed for these circuits. Until recently, spatial resolution largely limited the anatomical definition of functional clusters at the level of distinct thalamic nuclei. Since their anatomical distinction seems crucial not only for the segregation of cognitive and limbic loops but also for the detection of their functional interaction during cognitive-emotional integration, we applied high resolution fMRI on 7 Tesla. Using an event-related design, we could isolate thalamic effects for preceding attention as well as experience of erotic stimuli. We could demonstrate specific thalamic effects of general emotional arousal in mediodorsal nucleus and effects specific to preceding attention and expectancy in intralaminar centromedian/parafascicular complex. These thalamic effects were paralleled by specific coactivations in the head of caudate nucleus as well as segregated portions of rostral or caudal cingulate cortex and anterior insula supporting distinct thalamo-striato-cortical loops. In addition to predescribed effects of sexual arousal in hypothalamus and ventral striatum, high resolution fMRI could extent this network to paraventricular thalamus encompassing laterodorsal and parataenial nuclei. We could lend evidence to segregated subcortical loops which integrate cognitive and emotional aspects of basic human behavior such as sexual processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnana.2010.00138

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Together, these structures complete a discrete CSTC loop that can be discerned using structural or functional neuroimaging and that corresponds to an analogous loop evident on tract-tracing studies in nonhuman primates.

    “Together, these structures complete a discrete cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical (CSTC) loop that can be discerned using structural or functional neuroimaging (Seeley et al., 2007; Metzger et al., 2010), and that also corresponds to an analogous loop evident on tract-tracing studies in nonhuman primates (Choi et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 114

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vogt B. A. Pandya D. N. Rosene D. L. (1987b). Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: I. Cytoarchitecture and thalamic afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 262, 256– 270 10.1002/cne.902620207 3624554 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Metzger, C. D.
Affiliations
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Metzger, Coraline D.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Published
2010
Volume
4
Pages
138-138
ISSN
1662-5129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134191275
Cited by
114
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroanatomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
thalamocortical loop, mediodorsal thalamus, intralaminar nuclei, centromedian nucleus, parafascicular nucleus, cognitive-emotional integration, sexual arousal, erotic stimuli, attention, emotional arousal, caudate nucleus, cingulate cortex, anterior insula, paraventricular thalamus, high-resolution fMRI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review