Cited by 604Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: I. Cytoarchitecture and thalamic afferents

Vogt, Brent A., Pandya, Deepak N., Rosene, Douglas L.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The cytoarchitecture and thalamic afferents of cingulate cortex were evaluated in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Area 24 has three divisions of which area 24a is adjacent to the callosal sulcus and has the least laminar differentiation. Area 24b has more clearly defined layers II, III, and Va, and area 24c, which forms the lower bank of the anterior cingulate sulcus, has a particularly dense layer III. Area 23 also has three divisions, each of which has a distinct layer IV. Area 23a is adjacent to the callosal sulcus and has the thinnest layers II-IV, which have the same cell density as layers V and VI. Area 23b has the largest pyramids in layers IIIc and Va, and area 23c, in the depths of the posterior cingulate sulcus, has the broadest external and thinnest internal pyramidal layers. Finally, areas 29 and 30 are located in the posterior depths of the callosal sulcus. Two divisions of area 29 are apparent: one with a granular layer directly adjacent to layer I (area 29a-c) and another with differentiation of layers III and IV (area 29d). Area 30 has a dysgranular layer IV. Injections of the retrograde tracer horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were made into subdivisions of cingulate cortex in the monkey. Area 25 received thalamic input mainly from the midline parataenial (Pt), central densocellular (Cdc), and reuniens nuclei as well as from the dorsal parvicellular division of the mediodorsal nucleus (MDpc). A less dense projection also originated in the intralaminar parafasc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902620207

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the amygdala projects to anterior midcingulate cortex, increased anterior midcingulate cortex activity during fear perception may reflect response preparation to salient environmental stimuli.

    “The amygdala, which responds to motivationally salient exteroceptive sensory stimuli (see 5.1 The amygdala), projects to this area of aMCC (Vogt & Pandya 1987), so it is possible that increased activity here reflects response preparation to salient stimuli in the environment.”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Vogt & Pandya 1987

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogt, B. A., Pandya, D. N., & Rosene, D. L.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-08-08
Volume
262
Issue
2
Pages
256-270
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2026360097
Cited by
604
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS16841, NS 19416, NS18745)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cingulate cortex, rhesus monkeys, cytoarchitecture, thalamic afferents, nucleus reuniens, parafascicular nucleus, mediodorsal nucleus, intralaminar nuclei
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Thalamic Nuclei

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review