Cited by 173Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Context, emotion, and the strategic pursuit of goals: interactions among multiple brain systems controlling motivated behavior

Open access
Gruber, Aaron J., McDonald, Robert J.·2012·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Motivated behavior exhibits properties that change with experience and partially dissociate among a number of brain structures. Here, we review evidence from rodent experiments demonstrating that multiple brain systems acquire information in parallel and either cooperate or compete for behavioral control. We propose a conceptual model of systems interaction wherein a ventral emotional memory network involving ventral striatum (VS), amygdala, ventral hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex triages behavioral responding to stimuli according to their associated affective outcomes. This system engages autonomic and postural responding (avoiding, ignoring, approaching) in accordance with associated stimulus valence (negative, neutral, positive), but does not engage particular operant responses. Rather, this emotional system suppresses or invigorates actions that are selected through competition between goal-directed control involving dorsomedial striatum (DMS) and habitual control involving dorsolateral striatum (DLS). The hippocampus provides contextual specificity to the emotional system, and provides an information rich input to the goal-directed system for navigation and discriminations involving ambiguous contexts, complex sensory configurations, or temporal ordering. The rapid acquisition and high capacity for episodic associations in the emotional system may unburden the more complex goal-directed system and reduce interference in the habit system from processing contingencies of neutral stimuli. Interactions among these systems likely involve inhibitory mechanisms and neuromodulation in the striatum to form a dominant response strategy. Innate traits, training methods, and task demands contribute to the nature of these interactions, which can include incidental learning in non-dominant systems. Addition of these features to reinforcement learning models of decision-making may better align theoretical predictions with behavioral and neural correlates in animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00050

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain allow behavioral flexibility.

    “Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain (e.g., Gruber & McDonald, 2012; McDonald & White, 1993; White, 1996) also allow behavioral flexibility.”

    From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Gruber & McDonald, 2012

  • Instead of erasing R-O, S-R exists along with it, coded by a separate circuit in the brain.

    “However, instead of erasing R-O, S-R exists along with it, coded by a separate circuit in the brain (e.g., Balleine, 2019; Balleine & O'Doherty, 2010; Gruber & McDonald, 2012; Robbins et al., 2019).”

    From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Gruber & McDonald, 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 377 · Cited by 173

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kapp B. S. Wilson A. Pascoe J. P. Supple W. Whalen P. J. (1990). Neuroanatomical system analysis of bradycardia in the rabbit, in Neurocomputation and Learning: Foundations of Adaptive Networks, eds Gabriel M. Moore J. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 53– 90
  2. O'Keefe J. Nadel L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Congnitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. Pavlov I. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  4. Saper C. B. (2003). The hypothalamus, in In The Human Nervous System, ed Paxinos G. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 513– 550

Authors
Gruber, A. J., & McDonald, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Gruber, Aaron J.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
50-50
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966066878
Cited by
173
References
377
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Alberta Innovates
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
motivated behavior, goal-directed behavior, habit, emotional memory, ventral striatum, dorsomedial striatum, dorsolateral striatum, amygdala, ventral hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, stimulus valence, contextual specificity, reinforcement learning, decision-making, rodent models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review