Context, emotion, and the strategic pursuit of goals: interactions among multiple brain systems controlling motivated behavior
Open accessAbstract
Motivated behavior exhibits properties that change with experience and partially dissociate among a number of brain structures. Here, we review evidence from rodent experiments demonstrating that multiple brain systems acquire information in parallel and either cooperate or compete for behavioral control. We propose a conceptual model of systems interaction wherein a ventral emotional memory network involving ventral striatum (VS), amygdala, ventral hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex triages behavioral responding to stimuli according to their associated affective outcomes. This system engages autonomic and postural responding (avoiding, ignoring, approaching) in accordance with associated stimulus valence (negative, neutral, positive), but does not engage particular operant responses. Rather, this emotional system suppresses or invigorates actions that are selected through competition between goal-directed control involving dorsomedial striatum (DMS) and habitual control involving dorsolateral striatum (DLS). The hippocampus provides contextual specificity to the emotional system, and provides an information rich input to the goal-directed system for navigation and discriminations involving ambiguous contexts, complex sensory configurations, or temporal ordering. The rapid acquisition and high capacity for episodic associations in the emotional system may unburden the more complex goal-directed system and reduce interference in the habit system from processing contingencies of neutral stimuli. Interactions among these systems likely involve inhibitory mechanisms and neuromodulation in the striatum to form a dominant response strategy. Innate traits, training methods, and task demands contribute to the nature of these interactions, which can include incidental learning in non-dominant systems. Addition of these features to reinforcement learning models of decision-making may better align theoretical predictions with behavioral and neural correlates in animals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain allow behavioral flexibility.
“Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain (e.g., Gruber & McDonald, 2012; McDonald & White, 1993; White, 1996) also allow behavioral flexibility.”
From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Gruber & McDonald, 2012
Instead of erasing R-O, S-R exists along with it, coded by a separate circuit in the brain.
“However, instead of erasing R-O, S-R exists along with it, coded by a separate circuit in the brain (e.g., Balleine, 2019; Balleine & O'Doherty, 2010; Gruber & McDonald, 2012; Robbins et al., 2019).”
From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Gruber & McDonald, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 377 · Cited by 173
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kapp B. S. Wilson A. Pascoe J. P. Supple W. Whalen P. J. (1990). Neuroanatomical system analysis of bradycardia in the rabbit, in Neurocomputation and Learning: Foundations of Adaptive Networks, eds Gabriel M. Moore J. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 53– 90
- O'Keefe J. Nadel L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Congnitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Pavlov I. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Saper C. B. (2003). The hypothalamus, in In The Human Nervous System, ed Paxinos G. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 513– 550
- Authors
- Gruber, A. J., & McDonald, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gruber, Aaron J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 50-50
- ISSN
- 1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3411069
- OpenAlex
- W1966066878
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 377
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
- Alberta Innovates
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- motivated behavior, goal-directed behavior, habit, emotional memory, ventral striatum, dorsomedial striatum, dorsolateral striatum, amygdala, ventral hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, stimulus valence, contextual specificity, reinforcement learning, decision-making, rodent models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review