Cited by 39Gait Recognition and AnalysisProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gait Neural Network for Human-Exoskeleton Interaction

Open access
Fang, Bin, Zhou, Quan, Sun, Fuchun, Shan, Jianhua, Wang, Ming, Xiang, Cheng, Zhang, Qin·2020·Frontiers in Neurorobotics

Abstract

Robotic exoskeletons are developed with the aim of enhancing convenience and physical possibilities in daily life. However, at present, these devices lack sufficient synchronization with human movements. To optimize human-exoskeleton interaction, this article proposes a gait recognition and prediction model, called the gait neural network (GNN), which is based on the temporal convolutional network. It consists of an intermediate network, a target network, and a recognition and prediction model. The novel structure of the algorithm can make full use of the historical information from sensors. The performance of the GNN is evaluated based on the publicly available HuGaDB dataset, as well as on data collected by an inertial-based wearable motion capture device. The results show that the proposed approach is highly effective and achieves superior performance compared with existing methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00058

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bai, 2018, An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling
  2. Romero-Hernandez, 2019, “Deep learning prediction of gait based on inertial measurements,”, 284

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fang, B., Zhou, Q., Sun, F., Shan, J., Wang, M., Xiang, C., & Zhang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Anhui University of Technology (CN)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Fuchun
  • Shan, Jianhua
Venue
Frontiers in Neurorobotics
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
14
Pages
58-58
ISSN
1662-5218 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095743069
Cited by
39
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurorobotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1302302)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
robotic exoskeleton, human-exoskeleton interaction, gait recognition, gait prediction, temporal convolutional network, inertial sensors, wearable motion capture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review