Cited by 46Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVestibular and auditory disordersBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

A New Questionnaire for Estimating the Severity of Visual Height Intolerance and Acrophobia by a Metric Interval Scale

Open access
Huppert, Doreen, Grill, Eva, Brandt, Thomas·2017·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

AIMS: To construct and validate a short scale for the assessment of the severity of visual height intolerance (vHI) and acrophobia. METHODS: = 5,529). Items were applied in a telephone survey of a representative population-based sample. RESULTS: A total of 1,960 persons were included. The life-time prevalence of vHI was 32.7% (f: 36.1%; m: 28.4%); 12% of these persons fulfilled the psychiatric criteria of acrophobia. Rasch analysis of 11 items on severity, symptoms, and triggers resulted in an 8-item scale with good fit to the model. The score differentiated well between persons with and without acrophobia. The distribution of the scores on the metric scale of the questionnaires of those individuals with acrophobia is separate and distinct from that of susceptibles without acrophobia, although there is some overlap. CONCLUSION: Our proposed short questionnaire (vHISS, see Table 1 and Supplementary Material) allows a continuous quantification of the severity of vHI within a metric interval scale from 0 to 13. The diagnosis of acrophobia can be established by including two additional questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2017.00211

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integrated phobia psychometric questionnaires provide an objective progress overview via the Visual Height Intolerance questionnaire and allow reporting emotional impact via EmojiGrid.

    “This novel approach empowers users during their gamified therapeutic journey by providing an objective progress overview based on scoring using an auto-administered Visual Height Intolerance psychometric [101] questionnaire while also offering the possibility to report the emotional impact of exposure using the EmojiGrid embedding [102].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huppert, D., Grill, E., & Brandt, T.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtszentrum (DE)
  • Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (DE)
Corresponding author
Huppert, Doreen
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
8
Pages
211-211
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620406867
Cited by
46
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01 EO 0901)
  • Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
acrophobia, questionnaire development, disease severity assessment, Rasch analysis, prevalence, diagnostic criteria, phobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review