Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Post–exertional Malaise in Patients With Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Open access
Stussman, Barbara, Williams, Ashley, Snow, Joseph, Gavin, Angelique, Scott, Remle, Nath, Avindra, Walitt, Brian·2020·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is characterized by persistent and disabling fatigue, exercise intolerance, cognitive difficulty, and musculoskeletal/joint pain. Post-exertional malaise is a worsening of these symptoms after a physical or mental exertion and is considered a central feature of the illness. Scant observations in the available literature provide qualitative assessments of post-exertional malaise in patients with ME/CFS. To enhance our understanding, a series of outpatient focus groups were convened. Methods: Nine focus groups totaling 43 self-reported ME/CFS patients were held between November 2016 and August 2019. Focus groups queried post-exertional malaise in daily life and participants’ retrospective memory of post-exertional malaise that followed an exercise provocation with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Thematic analysis was used to systematically code and categorize the data for meaningful patterns to emerge. A qualitative software package was used to assist with data coding. Results: A wide range of symptoms were attributed to exertion both in daily lives and following cardiopulmonary exercise testing. While three major themes emerged (exhaustion, cognitive difficulties, and neuromuscular complaints), participants’ descriptions were notable for their unique individual variations. Of 18 participants who responded to questions centered around symptoms following a cardiopulmonary exercise test, 17 reported that symptoms started within 24 hours and peaked in severity within 72 hours following the cardiopulmonary exercise test. Conclusion: The experience of post-exertional malaise in ME/CFS varies greatly between individuals. Quantitative questionnaires using fixed questions may misclassify or fail to capture the entire experience of post-exertional malaise. A mixed methods approach appears necessary to evaluate ME/CFS patients for symptom outcomes and the development of management strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2020.01025

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Stussman, B., Williams, A., Snow, J., Gavin, A., Scott, R., Nath, A., & Walitt, B.
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2020-09-18
Volume
11
Pages
1025-1025
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087332817
Cited by
164
References
3
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Post–exertional Malaise in Patients With Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fneur.2020.01025
The paper
Stussman, B., Williams, A., Snow, J., Gavin, A., Scott, R., Nath, A., & Walitt, B. (2020). Characterization of Post–exertional Malaise in Patients With Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Frontiers in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.01025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.