CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 280EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decoding of four movement directions using hybrid NIRS-EEG brain-computer interface

Open access
Khan, M. Jawad, Hong, Melissa Jiyoun, Hong, Keum-Shik·2014·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00244PMC PMC4009438
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The hybrid brain-computer interface (BCI)'s multimodal technology enables precision brain-signal classification that can be used in the formulation of control commands. In the present study, an experimental hybrid near-infrared spectroscopy-electroencephalography (NIRS-EEG) technique was used to extract and decode four different types of brain signals. The NIRS setup was positioned over the prefrontal brain region, and the EEG over the left and right motor cortex regions. Twelve subjects participating in the experiment were shown four direction symbols, namely, "forward," "backward," "left," and "right." The control commands for forward and backward movement were estimated by performing arithmetic mental tasks related to oxy-hemoglobin (HbO) changes. The left and right directions commands were associated with right and left hand tapping, respectively. The high classification accuracies achieved showed that the four different control signals can be accurately estimated using the hybrid NIRS-EEG technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00244

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Experimental paradigm. One complete data set over the span of a minute, consisting of four rest periods, two task periods detected by NIRS from the prefrontal brain region and two motor execution periods detected from C3 and C4 regions of brain using EEG.
Figure 1 Experimental paradigm. One complete data set over the span of a minute, consisting of four rest periods, two task periods detected by NIRS from the prefrontal brain region and two motor execution periods detected from C3 and C4 regions of brain using EEG.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Optode location for EEG and NIRS. (A) 8 EEG electrodes placement over the Cz of the brain, (B) 12 channel locations on the prefrontal brain region using three sources and eight detectors.
Figure 2 Optode location for EEG and NIRS. (A) 8 EEG electrodes placement over the Cz of the brain, (B) 12 channel locations on the prefrontal brain region using three sources and eight detectors.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 System block diagram. The complete process from signal acquisition to control commands generation.
Figure 3 System block diagram. The complete process from signal acquisition to control commands generation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Brain-signal acquisition: Each spike from the left or right motor cortex represents a hand tapping with the right or left hand, respectively. The concentration change in the prefrontal brain region reflects the change from rest to mental counting (“forward”) and mental subtraction (“backward”).
Figure 4 Brain-signal acquisition: Each spike from the left or right motor cortex represents a hand tapping with the right or left hand, respectively. The concentration change in the prefrontal brain region reflects the change from rest to mental counting (“forward”) and mental subtraction (“backward”).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Stop condition: Common rest state of the three signals is selected as stop command. The “Stop” command can only be generated if absolute rest is detected from three brain regions.
Figure 5 Stop condition: Common rest state of the three signals is selected as stop command. The “Stop” command can only be generated if absolute rest is detected from three brain regions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 EEG data classification for left and right control commands. (A) Shows the classification of trials for “Left” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 7, (B) Shows the classification of trials for “Right” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 6.
Figure 6 EEG data classification for left and right control commands. (A) Shows the classification of trials for “Left” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 7, (B) Shows the classification of trials for “Right” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 6.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 NIRS data classification for forward and backward control commands. (A) Shows the classification of trials for “Forward” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 3, (B) Shows the classification of trials for “Backward” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 7.
Figure 7 NIRS data classification for forward and backward control commands. (A) Shows the classification of trials for “Forward” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 3, (B) Shows the classification of trials for “Backward” and “Stop” command signals for Subject 7.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lin, 2012, Wireless brian-computer interface for electric wheelcahirs with EEG and eye-blinking signals, Int. J. Innovat. Comput. Inform. Control, 8, 6011
  2. Turnip, 2012, Classifying mental activities from EEG-P300 signals using adaptive neural network, Int. J. Innovat. Comput. Inform. Control, 8, 6429

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 280

Related

Metadata

Authors
Khan, M. J., Hong, M. J., & Hong, K.-S.
Affiliations
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Hong, Keum-Shik
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2014-04-28
Volume
8
Pages
244-244
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00244
PMC
PMC4009438
OpenAlex
W1974893143
Cited by
280
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 8
FWCI
20.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
hybrid brain-computer interface, near-infrared spectroscopy, EEG, prefrontal cortex, motor cortex, oxyhemoglobin, hand tapping, brain signal classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review