Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 298 of the 298 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020)

Open access
Farmer, Adam D., Strzelczyk, Adam, Finisguerra, Alessandra, Gourine, Alexander V., Gharabaghi, Alireza, Hasan, Alkomiet, Burger, Andreas M., Jaramillo, Andrés M., Mertens, Ann, Majid, Arshad, Verkuil, Bart, Badran, Bashar W., Ventura-Bort, Carlos, Gaul, Charly, Beste, Christian, Warren, Christopher M., Quintana, Daniel S., Hämmerer, Dorothea, Freri, Elena, Frangos, Eleni, Tobaldini, Eleonora, Kaniusas, Eugenijus, Rosenow, Felix, Capone, Fioravante, Panetsos, Fivos, Ackland, Gareth L., Kaithwas, Gaurav, O'Leary, Georgia H., Genheimer, Hannah, Jacobs, Heidi I. L., Van Diest, Ilse, Schoenen, Jean, Redgrave, Jessica, Fang, Jiliang, Deuchars, Jim, Széles, Jozsef C., Thayer, Julian F., More, Kaushik, Vonck, Kristl, Steenbergen, Laura, Vianna, Lauro C., McTeague, Lisa M., Ludwig, Mareike, Veldhuizen, Maria G., De Couck, Marijke, Casazza, Marina, Keute, Marius, Bikson, Marom, Andreatta, Marta, D'Agostini, Martina, Weymar, Mathias, Betts, Matthew, Prigge, Matthias, Kaess, Michael, Roden, Michael, Thai, Michelle, Schuster, Nathaniel M., Montano, Nicola, Hansen, Niels, Kroemer, Nils B., Rong, Peijing, Fischer, Rico, Howland, Robert H., Sclocco, Roberta, Sellaro, Roberta, Garcia, Ronald G., Bauer, Sebastian, Gancheva, Sofiya, Stavrakis, Stavros, Kampusch, Stefan, Deuchars, Susan A., Wehner, Sven, Laborde, Sylvain, Usichenko, Taras, Polak, Thomas, Zaehle, Tino, Borges, Uirassu, Teckentrup, Vanessa, Jandackova, Vera K., Napadow, Vitaly, Koenig, Julian·2021·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Given its non-invasive nature, there is increasing interest in the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) across basic, translational and clinical research. Contemporaneously, tVNS can be achieved by stimulating either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve, referred to as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation(VNS) and transcutaneous cervical VNS, respectively. In order to advance the field in a systematic manner, studies using these technologies need to adequately report sufficient methodological detail to enable comparison of results between studies, replication of studies, as well as enhancing study participant safety. We systematically reviewed the existing tVNS literature to evaluate current reporting practices. Based on this review, and consensus among participating authors, we propose a set of minimal reporting items to guide future tVNS studies. The suggested items address specific technical aspects of the device and stimulation parameters. We also cover general recommendations including inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, outcome parameters and the detailed reporting of side effects. Furthermore, we review strategies used to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a given research setting and summarize ongoing developments in animal research with potential implications for the application of tVNS in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential of tVNS in future research as well as the associated challenges across several disciplines in research and clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051

Cites

298 of 298 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 298 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Farmer, A. D., Strzelczyk, A., Finisguerra, A., Gourine, A. V., Gharabaghi, A., Hasan, A., Burger, A. M., Jaramillo, A. M., Mertens, A., Majid, A., Verkuil, B., Badran, B. W., Ventura-Bort, C., Gaul, C., Beste, C., Warren, C. M., Quintana, D. S., Hämmerer, D., Freri, E., Frangos, E., Tobaldini, E., Kaniusas, E., Rosenow, F., Capone, F., Panetsos, F., Ackland, G. L., Kaithwas, G., O'Leary, G. H., Genheimer, H., Jacobs, H. I. L., Van Diest, I., Schoenen, J., Redgrave, J., Fang, J., Deuchars, J., Széles, J. C., Thayer, J. F., More, K., Vonck, K., Steenbergen, L., Vianna, L. C., McTeague, L. M., Ludwig, M., Veldhuizen, M. G., De Couck, M., Casazza, M., Keute, M., Bikson, M., Andreatta, M., D'Agostini, M., Weymar, M., Betts, M., Prigge, M., Kaess, M., Roden, M., Thai, M., Schuster, N. M., Montano, N., Hansen, N., Kroemer, N. B., Rong, P., Fischer, R., Howland, R. H., Sclocco, R., Sellaro, R., Garcia, R. G., Bauer, S., Gancheva, S., Stavrakis, S., Kampusch, S., Deuchars, S. A., Wehner, S., Laborde, S., Usichenko, T., Polak, T., Zaehle, T., Borges, U., Teckentrup, V., Jandackova, V. K., Napadow, V., & Koenig, J.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
14
Pages
568051-568051
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137226137
Cited by
355
References
298
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051
The paper
Farmer, A. D., Strzelczyk, A., Finisguerra, A., Gourine, A. V., Gharabaghi, A., Hasan, A., Burger, A. M., Jaramillo, A. M., Mertens, A., Majid, A., Verkuil, B., Badran, B. W., Ventura-Bort, C., Gaul, C., Beste, C., Warren, C. M., Quintana, D. S., Hämmerer, D., Freri, E., . . . Koenig, J. (2021). International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.