Cited by 49EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain functionMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of ECoG magnitude and phase in decoding position, velocity, and acceleration during continuous motor behavior

Open access
Hammer, Jiri, Fischer, Jörg, Ruescher, Johanna, Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas, Aertsen, Ad, Ball, Tonio·2013·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

In neuronal population signals, including the electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocorticogram (ECoG), the low-frequency component (LFC) is particularly informative about motor behavior and can be used for decoding movement parameters for brain-machine interface (BMI) applications. An idea previously expressed, but as of yet not quantitatively tested, is that it is the LFC phase that is the main source of decodable information. To test this issue, we analyzed human ECoG recorded during a game-like, one-dimensional, continuous motor task with a novel decoding method suitable for unfolding magnitude and phase explicitly into a complex-valued, time-frequency signal representation, enabling quantification of the decodable information within the temporal, spatial and frequency domains and allowing disambiguation of the phase contribution from that of the spectral magnitude. The decoding accuracy based only on phase information was substantially (at least 2 fold) and significantly higher than that based only on magnitudes for position, velocity and acceleration. The frequency profile of movement-related information in the ECoG data matched well with the frequency profile expected when assuming a close time-domain correlate of movement velocity in the ECoG, e.g., a (noisy) "copy" of hand velocity. No such match was observed with the frequency profiles expected when assuming a copy of either hand position or acceleration. There was also no indication of additional magnitude-based mechanisms encoding movement information in the LFC range. Thus, our study contributes to elucidating the nature of the informative LFC of motor cortical population activity and may hence contribute to improve decoding strategies and BMI performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2013.00200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The deep ConvNets as used here may have learned features different from FBCSP, which could explain their higher accuracies in the lower frequencies where band power features may be less important.

    “However, the deep ConvNets as used here may have learned features different from FBCSP, which could explain their higher accuracies in the lower frequencies where band power features may be less important [Hammer et al., 2013].”
  • Phase information is less important in the higher than the lower frequencies.

    “which is less important in the higher than the lower frequencies [Hammer et al., 2013]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Acharya S. Fifer M. S. Benz H. L. Crone N. E. Thakor N. V. (2010). Electrocorticographic amplitude predicts finger positions during slow grasping motions of the hand. J. Neural Eng. 7, 046002 10.1088/1741-2560/7/4/046002 20489239 PMC4021582 · DOI
  2. Aertsen A. Johannesma P. I. M. (1980). Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog I. Characterization of tonal and natural stimuli. Biol. Cybern. 38, 223– 234 10.1007/BF00337015 6972785 · DOI
  3. Ball T. Schulze-Bonhage A. Aertsen A. Mehring C. (2009). Differential representation of arm movement direction in relation to cortical anatomy and function. J. Neural. Eng. 6, 016006 10.1088/1741-2560/6/1/016006 19155551 · DOI
  4. Boashash B. (1992). Estimating and Interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal—part I: fundamentals. Proc. IEEE 80, 520– 538 10.1109/5.135376 · DOI
  5. Bradberry T. J. Gentili R. J. Contreras-Vidal J. L. (2010). Reconstructing three-dimensional hand movements from noninvasive electroencephalographic signals. J. Neurosci. 30, 3432– 3437 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6107-09.2010 20203202 PMC6634107 · DOI
  6. Eickhoff S. B. Heim S. Zilles K. Amunts K. (2006). Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. Neuroimage 32, 570– 582 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.204 16781166 · DOI
  7. Fetz E. E. Cheney P. D. (1980). Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. J. Neurophysiol. 44, 751– 772 6253604
  8. Georgopoulos A. P. Kalaska J. F. Caminiti R. Massey J. T. (1982). On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 1527– 1537 7143039 PMC6564361
  9. Georgopoulos A. P. Langheim F. J. Leuthold A. C. Merkle A. N. (2005). Magnetoencephalographic signals predict movement trajectory in space. Exp. Brain Res. 167, 132– 135 10.1007/s00221-005-0028-8 16044305 · DOI
  10. Hore J. Flament D. (1988). Changes in motor cortex neural discharge associated with the development of cerebellar limb ataxia. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 1285– 1302 3193158
  11. Jerbi K. Lachaux J. P. N'Diaye K. Pantazis D. Leahy R. M. Garnero L. (2007). Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 7676– 7681 10.1073/pnas.0609632104 17442753 PMC1863498 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Johannesma P. I. M. Aertsen A. M. H. J. Cranen L. van Erning L. (1981). The phonochrome: a coherent spectro-temporal representation of sound. Hear. Res. 5, 123– 145 10.1016/0378-5955(81)90042-3 7309636 · DOI
  13. Kettner R. E. Schwartz A. B. Georgopoulos A. P. (1988). Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. III. Positional gradients and population coding of movement direction from various movement origins. J. Neurosci. 8, 2938– 2947. 3411363 PMC6569383
  14. Kubánek J. Miller K. J. Ojemann J. G. Wolpaw J. R. Schalk G. (2009). Decoding flexion of individual fingers using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 6, 066001 10.1088/1741-2560/6/6/066001 19794237 PMC3664231 · DOI
  15. Lakatos P. Shah A. S. Knuth K. H. Ulbert I. Karmos G. Schroeder C. E. (2005). An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1904– 1911 10.1152/jn.00263.2005 15901760 · DOI
  16. Lyons R. (2003). DSP tips and tricks—the sliding DFT. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 20, 74– 80 10.1109/MSP.2003.1184347 · DOI
  17. Mehring C. Nawrot M. P. Cardoso de Oliveira S. Vaadia E. Schulze-Bonhage A. Aertsen A. (2004). Comparing information about arm movement direction in single channels of local and epicortical field potentials from monkey and human motor cortex. J. Physiol. Paris 98, 498– 506 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.016 16310349 · DOI
  18. Mehring C. Rickert J. Vaadia E. Cardoso de Oliveira S. Aertsen A. Rotter S. (2003). Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1253– 1254 10.1038/nn1158 14634657 · DOI
  19. Milekovic T. Fischer J. Pistohl T. Ruescher J. Schulze-Bonhage A. Aertsen A. (2012). An online brain-machine interface using decoding of movement direction from the human electrocorticogram. J. Neural Eng. 9, 046003 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046003 22713666 · DOI
  20. Miller K. J. Hermes D. Honey C. J. Hebb A. O. Ramsey N. F. Knight R. T. (2012). Human motor cortical activity is selectively phase-entrained on underlying rhythms. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8: e1002655 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002655 22969416 PMC3435268 · DOI
  21. Miller K. J. Sorensen L. B. Ojemann J. G. den Nijs M. (2009). Power-law scaling in the brain surface electric potential. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5: e1000609 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000609 20019800 PMC2787015 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ng B. S. Logothetis N. K. Kayser C. (2013). EEG phase patterns reflect the selectivity of neural firing. Cereb Cortex 23, 389– 398 10.1093/cercor/bhs031 22345353 · DOI
  23. Paninski L. Fellows M. Hatsopoulos N. Donoghue J. P. (2004). Spatiotemporal tuning of motor cortical neurons for hand position and velocity. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 515– 532 10.1152/jn.00587.2002 13679402 · DOI
  24. Panzeri S. Brunel N. Logothetis N. K. Kayser C. (2010). Sensory neural codes using multiplexed temporal scales. Trends Neurosci. 33, 111– 120 10.1016/j.tins.2009.12.001 20045201 · DOI
  25. Persoon F. Fu K. (1977). Shape descrimination using Fourier descriptors. IEEE transactions on systems. Man Cybern. 7, 170– 179 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309681 · DOI
  26. Pistohl T. Ball T. Schulze-Bonhage A. Aertsen A. Mehring C. (2008). Prediction of arm movement trajectories from ECoG-recordings in humans. J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 105– 115 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.10.001 18022247 · DOI
  27. Pistohl T. Schulze-Bonhage A. Aertsen A. Mehring C. Ball T. (2012). Decoding natural grasp types from human ECoG. Neuroimage 59, 248– 260 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.084 21763434 · DOI
  28. Rickert J. Cardoso de Oliviera S. Vaadia E. Aertsen A. Rotter S. Mehring C. (2005). Encoding of movement direction in different frequency ranges of motor cortical local field potentials. J. Neurosci. 25, 8815– 8824 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0816-05.2005 16192371 PMC6725584 · DOI
  29. Rumeau C. Tzourio N. Murayama N. Peretti-Viton P. Levrier O. Joliot M. (1994). Location of hand function in the sensorimotor cortex: MR and functional correlation. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 15, 567– 572 8197959 PMC8334317
  30. Schalk G. Kubánek J. Miller K. J. Anderson N. R. Leuthardt E. C. Ojemann J. G. (2007). Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 4, 264– 275 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/012 17873429 · DOI
  31. Schwartz A. B. Moran D. W. (1999). Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. J. Neurophysiol. 82, 2705– 2718 10561439
  32. Stark E. Drori R. Abeles M. (2009). Motor cortical activity related to movement kinematics exhibits local spatial organization. Cortex 45, 418– 431 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.03.011 18715554 · DOI
  33. Steinmetz H. Furst G. Meyer B. U. (1989). Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 499– 506 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90227-7 2471619 · DOI
  34. Todorov E. (2000). Direct cortical control of muscle activation in voluntary arm movements: a model. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 391– 398 10.1038/73964 10725930 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Waldert S. Pistohl T. Braun C. Ball T. Aertsen A. Mehring C. (2009). A review on directional information in neural signals for brain-machine interfaces. J. Physiol. Paris 103, 244– 254 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.007 19665554 · DOI
  36. Waldert S. Preissl H. Demandt E. Braun C. Birbaumer N. Aertsen A. (2008). Hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J. Neurosci. 28, 1000– 1008 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5171-07.2008 18216207 PMC6671004 · DOI
  37. Wu W. Gao Y. Bienenstock E. Donoghue J. P. Black M. J. (2006). Bayesian population decoding of motor cortical activity using a Kalman filter. Neural Comput. 18, 80– 118 10.1162/089976606774841585 16354382 · DOI
  38. Yousry T. A. Schmid U. D. Alkadhi H. Schmidt D. Peraud A. Buettner A. (1997). Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. Brain 120, 141– 157 10.1093/brain/120.1.141 9055804 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hammer, J., Fischer, J., Ruescher, J., Schulze-Bonhage, A., Aertsen, A., & Ball, T.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
200-200
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972999291
Cited by
49
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-1086 BrainLinks-BrainTools, EXC‐1086)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (0313891, 0316064C)
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (EXC 1086)
  • BrainLinks-BrainTools
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
electrocorticography, low-frequency components, brain-computer interface, hand position, hand velocity, hand acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review