Cited by 742Neural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTheoretical and Computational Physics

Power-Law Scaling in the Brain Surface Electric Potential

Open access
Miller, Kai J., Sorensen, Larry B., Ojemann, Jeffrey G., den Nijs, Marcel·2009·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Recent studies have identified broadband phenomena in the electric potentials produced by the brain. We report the finding of power-law scaling in these signals using subdural electrocorticographic recordings from the surface of human cortex. The power spectral density (PSD) of the electric potential has the power-law form P(f ) approximately Af(-chi) from 80 to 500 Hz. This scaling index, chi = 4.0+/-0.1, is conserved across subjects, area in the cortex, and local neural activity levels. The shape of the PSD does not change with increases in local cortical activity, but the amplitude, A, increases. We observe a "knee" in the spectra at f(0) approximately 75 Hz, implying the existence of a characteristic time scale tau = (2pif(0))(-1) approximately 2 - 4ms. Below f(0), we explore two-power-law forms of the PSD, and demonstrate that there are activity-related fluctuations in the amplitude of a power-law process lying beneath the alpha/beta rhythms. Finally, we illustrate through simulation how, small-scale, simplified neuronal models could lead to these power-law observations. This suggests a new paradigm of non-oscillatory "asynchronous," scale-free, changes in cortical potentials, corresponding to changes in mean population-averaged firing rate, to complement the prevalent "synchronous" rhythm-based paradigm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000609

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The power spectra of neural signals typically follow a power-law form, indicating temporal correlations that persist across multiple timescales.

    “The power spectra of neural signals typically follow a power-law form (), indicating temporal correlations that persist across multiple timescales (He et al. 2010; Miller et al. 2009; Linkenkaer-Hansen et al. 2001; Touboul and Destexhe 2010).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Miller et al. 2009

    The Abstract and Results report power-law spectra in human cortical-surface recordings, particularly from 80–500 Hz. The Introduction describes a process with no preferred timescale, but the Discussion links the spectra to possible short characteristic correlation times; it does not establish persistent temporal correlations across multiple timescales or that neural signals generally have this form. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K. J., Sorensen, L. B., Ojemann, J. G., & den Nijs, M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Kai J.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2009-12-18
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
e1000609
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2025933288
Cited by
742
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0622252, 0130705)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
power-law scaling, power spectral density, subdural electrocorticography, human cortex, characteristic time scales, neuronal firing rate
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Poisson Distribution, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review