The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python
Open accessAbstract
Magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography (M/EEG) measure the weak electromagnetic signals generated by neuronal activity in the brain. Using these signals to characterize and locate neural activation in the brain is a challenge that requires expertise in physics, signal processing, statistics, and numerical methods. As part of the MNE software suite, MNE-Python is an open-source software package that addresses this challenge by providing state-of-the-art algorithms implemented in Python that cover multiple methods of data preprocessing, source localization, statistical analysis, and estimation of functional connectivity between distributed brain regions. All algorithms and utility functions are implemented in a consistent manner with well-documented interfaces, enabling users to create M/EEG data analysis pipelines by writing Python scripts. Moreover, MNE-Python is tightly integrated with the core Python libraries for scientific comptutation (NumPy, SciPy) and visualization (matplotlib and Mayavi), as well as the greater neuroimaging ecosystem in Python via the Nibabel package. The code is provided under the new BSD license allowing code reuse, even in commercial products. Although MNE-Python has only been under heavy development for a couple of years, it has rapidly evolved with expanded analysis capabilities and pedagogical tutorials because multiple labs have collaborated during code development to help share best practices. MNE-Python also gives easy access to preprocessed datasets, helping users to get started quickly and facilitating reproducibility of methods by other researchers. Full documentation, including dozens of examples, is available at http://martinos.org/mne.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature
Destrieux, C., Fischl, B., Dale, A., & Halgren, E. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010 · Cited by 2,956
Van Veen, B. D., Van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M., & Suzuki, A. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.623056 · Cited by 2,561
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation
Fries, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 · Cited by 1,713
Wang, J.-Z., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.142641 · Cited by 299
Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: Sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations
Gramfort, A., Strohmeier, D., Haueisen, J., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kowalski, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.051 · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Cited by
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface
Lorach, H., Galvez, A., Spagnolo, V., Martel, F., Karakas, S., Intering, N., Vat, M., Faivre, O., Harte, C., Komi, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5 · Cited by 631
“Stereotypical artefacts (cardiac, ocular) were identified by independent components analysis using MNE-Python software 45 and rejected on visual screening (Infomax method, calculated separately for magnetometers and gradiometers using 64 components).”
MethodA high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control
Metzger, S. L., Littlejohn, K. T., Silva, A. B., Moses, D. A., Seaton, M. P., Wang, R., Dougherty, M. E., Liu, J. R., Wu, P., Berger, M. A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06443-4 · Cited by 522
Korolczuk, I., Burle, B., Coull, J. T., & Śmigasiewicz, K. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01795 · Cited by 528
Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual system
Kietzmann, T. C., Spoerer, C. J., Sörensen, L. K. A., Cichy, R. M., Hauk, O., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1905544116 · Cited by 406
Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations
Donoghue, T., Schaworonkow, N., & Voytek, B. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15361 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Gramfort, A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 267-267
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169918686
- Cited by
- 3,784
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
- The paper
- Gramfort, A. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.