Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology

Open access
Sourikopoulos, Ilias, Hedayat, Sara, Loyez, Christophe, Danneville, François, Hoel, Virginie, Mercier, Eric, Cappy, Alain·2017·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

As Moore’s law reaches its end, traditional computing technology based on the Von Neumann architecture is facing fundamental limits. Among them is poor energy efficiency. This situation motivates the investigation of different processing information paradigms, such as the use of spiking neural networks, which also introduce cognitive characteristics. As applications at very high scale are addressed, the energy dissipation needs to be minimized. This effort starts from the neuron cell. In this context, this paper presents the design of an original artificial neuron, in standard 65nm CMOS technology with optimized energy efficiency. The neuron circuit response is designed as an approximation of the Morris-Lecar theoretical model. In order to implement the non-linear gating variables, which control the ionic channel currents, transistors operating in deep subthreshold are employed. Two different circuit variants describing the neuron model equations have been developed. The first one features spike characteristics, which correlate well with a biological neuron model. The second one is a simplification of the first, designed to exhibit higher spiking frequencies, targeting large scale bio-inspired information processing applications. The most important feature of the fabricated circuits is the energy efficiency of a few femtojoules per spike, which improves prior state-of-the-art by two to three orders of magnitude. This performance is achieved by minimizing two key parameters: the supply voltage and the related membrane capacitance. Meanwhile, the obtained standby power at a resting output does not exceed tens of picowatts. The two variants were sized to 200µm2 and 35µm2 with the latter reaching a spiking output frequency of 26kHz. This performance level could address various contexts, such as highly integrated neuro-processors for robotics, neuroscience or medical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2017.00123

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Sourikopoulos, I., Hedayat, S., Loyez, C., Danneville, F., Hoel, V., Mercier, E., & Cappy, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2017-03-15
Volume
11
Pages
123-123
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2596998695
Cited by
216
References
9
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2017.00123
The paper
Sourikopoulos, I., Hedayat, S., Loyez, C., Danneville, F., Hoel, V., Mercier, E., & Cappy, A. (2017). A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.