The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology
Open accessAbstract
As Moore’s law reaches its end, traditional computing technology based on the Von Neumann architecture is facing fundamental limits. Among them is poor energy efficiency. This situation motivates the investigation of different processing information paradigms, such as the use of spiking neural networks, which also introduce cognitive characteristics. As applications at very high scale are addressed, the energy dissipation needs to be minimized. This effort starts from the neuron cell. In this context, this paper presents the design of an original artificial neuron, in standard 65nm CMOS technology with optimized energy efficiency. The neuron circuit response is designed as an approximation of the Morris-Lecar theoretical model. In order to implement the non-linear gating variables, which control the ionic channel currents, transistors operating in deep subthreshold are employed. Two different circuit variants describing the neuron model equations have been developed. The first one features spike characteristics, which correlate well with a biological neuron model. The second one is a simplification of the first, designed to exhibit higher spiking frequencies, targeting large scale bio-inspired information processing applications. The most important feature of the fabricated circuits is the energy efficiency of a few femtojoules per spike, which improves prior state-of-the-art by two to three orders of magnitude. This performance is achieved by minimizing two key parameters: the supply voltage and the related membrane capacitance. Meanwhile, the obtained standby power at a resting output does not exceed tens of picowatts. The two variants were sized to 200µm2 and 35µm2 with the latter reaching a spiking output frequency of 26kHz. This performance level could address various contexts, such as highly integrated neuro-processors for robotics, neuroscience or medical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Memristive devices for computing
Yang, J. J., Strukov, D. B., & Stewart, D. R. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.240 · Cited by 3,885
An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain
Attwell, D., & Laughlin, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 · Cited by 3,543
Training and operation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors
Prezioso, M., Merrikh-Bayat, F., Hoskins, B. D., Adam, G. C., Likharev, K. K., & Strukov, D. B. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14441 · Cited by 3,001
The chips are down for Moore’s law
Waldrop, M. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/530144a · Cited by 2,397
Neuromorphic electronic systems
Mead, C. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58356 · Cited by 2,368
Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber
Morris, C., & Lecar, H. (1981) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(81)84782-0 · Cited by 2,302
The cost of cortical computation.
Lennie, P. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00135-0 · Cited by 1,134
Kim, K.-H., Gaba, S., Wheeler, D., Cruz-Albrecht, J. M., Hussain, T., Srinivasa, N., & Lu, W. (2012) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl203687n · Cited by 924 · cited 1×
“As far as hardware implementations of SNNs are concerned, the alternative, “neuromorphic,” approach consists of employing VLSI circuit technology, namely CMOS fabrication processes which can be possibly associated with more advanced device technology such as memristors (Kim et al., 2012).”
Method
Cited by
Memristive crossbar arrays for brain-inspired computing
Xia, Q., & Yang, J. J. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0291-x · Cited by 1,800
Fully memristive neural networks for pattern classification with unsupervised learning
Wang, Z., Joshi, S., Savel’ev, S., Song, W., Midya, R., Li, Y., Rao, M., Yan, P., Asapu, S., Zhuo, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0023-2 · Cited by 1,106
Neuro-inspired electronic skin for robots
Liu, F., Deswal, S., Christou, A., Sandamirskaya, Y., Kaboli, M., & Dahiya, R. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abl7344 · Cited by 300
Hardware Implementation of Neuromorphic Computing Using Large‐Scale Memristor Crossbar Arrays
Li, Y., & Ang, K.-W. (2021) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202000137 · Cited by 220
Perspective: A review on memristive hardware for neuromorphic computation
Sung, C., Hwang, H., & Yoo, I. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5037835 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Sourikopoulos, I., Hedayat, S., Loyez, C., Danneville, F., Hoel, V., Mercier, E., & Cappy, A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 123-123
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2596998695
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2017.00123
- The paper
- Sourikopoulos, I., Hedayat, S., Loyez, C., Danneville, F., Hoel, V., Mercier, E., & Cappy, A. (2017). A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.