Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Classification of Subcortical Vascular Cognitive Impairment Using Single MRI Sequence and Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Wang, Yao, Tu, Danyang, Du, Jing, Han, Xu, Sun, Yawen, Xu, Qun, Zhai, Guangtao, Zhou, Yan·2019·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Deep learning has great potential for imaging classification by extracting low to high-level features. Our aim was to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) with single T2-weighted FLAIR sequence to classify different cognitive performances in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD). In total, 217 patients with SIVD [including 52 with vascular dementia (VaD), 82 with vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI), and 83 with non-cognitive impairment (NCI)] and 46 matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent MRI scans and neuropsychological assessments. 2D and 3D CNNs were trained to classify VaD, VaMCI, NCI, and HCs based on FLAIR data. For 3D-based model, the loss curves of the training set approached 0.017 after about 20 epochs, while the curves of the testing set maintained at about 0.114. The accuracy of training set and testing set reached 99.7 and 96.9% after about 30 and 35 epochs, respectively. However, the accuracy of the 2D-based model was only around 70%, which performed significantly worse than 3D-based model. This experiment suggests that deep learning is a powerful and convenient method to classify different cognitive performances in SIVD by extracting the shift and scale invariant features of neuroimaging data with single FLAIR sequence. 3D-CNN is superior to 2D-CNN which involves clinical evaluation with MRI multiplanar reformation or volume scanning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2019.00627

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous groups have taken on the challenge of nADD diagnosis using deep learning, but even these tasks were constructed as simple binary classifications between disease subtypes.

    “Though numerous groups have taken on the challenge of nADD diagnosis using deep learning18–20,25,26, even these tasks were constructed as simple binary classifications between disease subtypes.”

    From Multimodal deep learning for Alzheimer's disease dementia assessment (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction says most earlier SVCI studies used binary classification, but this paper explicitly presents its own task as multiclass. The Materials and Methods (Statistical Analysis; no page number in our copy) says its deep-learning model distinguishes four categories, not two. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CNN classifiers using T2-FLAIR can distinguish VaD, vascular MCI, and nonimpaired cohorts in subcortical ischemic vascular disease with 96.9% accuracy.

    “CNN classifiers using T2-FLAIR can distinguish VaD, vascular MCI, and nonimpaired cohorts in subcortical ischemic vascular disease with 96.9% accuracy”

    From Multimodal neuroimaging and AI integration in cognitive disorders: advances, challenges, and future directions for precision medicine (2026) · cites this paper as Yao Wang et al., 2019

    The Abstract and Results > Loss and Accuracy report 96.9% testing accuracy using a single T2-FLAIR sequence, but that result is for the 3D CNN classifying four groups: VaD, VaMCI, non-cognitively impaired SIVD patients, and healthy controls. The cited result is not a three-group accuracy, and the 2D CNN achieved only about 70%. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ji S. Xu W. Yang M. Yu K. (2013). 3d convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35 221– 231. 10.1109/tpami.2012.59 22392705 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Tu, D., Du, J., Han, X., Sun, Y., Xu, Q., Zhai, G., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhai, Guangtao
  • Zhou, Yan
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2019-06-19
Volume
13
Pages
627-627
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952091205
Cited by
25
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (20172013)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17411964300)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Renji Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
subcortical ischemic vascular disease, vascular cognitive impairment, vascular dementia, vascular mild cognitive impairment, FLAIR MRI, convolutional neural networks, 3D convolutional neural networks, 2D convolutional neural network, neuroimaging classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review